Literature DB >> 26833200

Investigating a method for reducing residual switch costs in cued task switching.

Darryl W Schneider1.   

Abstract

Residual switch costs in cued task switching are performance decrements that occur despite a long cue-target interval (CTI) to prepare for a task switch. Verbruggen, Liefooghe, Vandierendonck, and Demanet (Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33; 342-356, 2007) showed that briefly presenting the cue during the CTI and leaving it absent after target onset yielded smaller residual switch costs than those obtained when the cue was available for the full CTI and remained present after target onset. The potential effects of cue availability during the CTI (full or partial) and cue status after target onset (present or absent) on residual switch costs were investigated in the present study. In Experiments 1 and 2, cue status was manipulated while holding cue availability constant. In Experiments 3 and 4, cue status and cue availability were manipulated factorially. Residual switch costs were obtained, but they were not modulated consistently by cue status or cue availability across experiments. In Experiment 5, a direct replication of one of Verbruggen and colleagues' experiments yielded divergent results. Implications for understanding task switching are discussed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cue absence; Cue availability; Residual switch cost; Task cuing; Task switching

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26833200     DOI: 10.3758/s13421-016-0590-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  34 in total

1.  Changing internal constraints on action: the role of backward inhibition.

Authors:  U Mayr; S W Keele
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2000-03

2.  The influence of cue-task association and location on switch cost and alternating-switch cost.

Authors:  Katherine D Arbuthnott; Todd S Woodward
Journal:  Can J Exp Psychol       Date:  2002-03

3.  Modeling cognitive control in task-switching.

Authors:  N Meiran
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2000

4.  Task-set switching and long-term memory retrieval.

Authors:  U Mayr; R Kliegl
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Very clever homunculus: compound stimulus strategies for the explicit task-cuing procedure.

Authors:  Gordon D Logan; Claus Bundesen
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-10

6.  Modeling task switching without switching tasks: a short-term priming account of explicitly cued performance.

Authors:  Darryl W Schneider; Gordon D Logan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2005-08

7.  Interpreting instructional cues in task switching procedures: the role of mediator retrieval.

Authors:  Gordon D Logan; Darryl W Schneider
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  Influence of display type and cue format on task-cuing effects: dissociating switch cost and right-left prevalence effects.

Authors:  Robert W Proctor; Iring Koch; Kim-Phuong L Vu; Motonori Yamaguchi
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-07

9.  Task-switching performance with 1:1 and 2:1 cue-task mappings: not so different after all.

Authors:  Darryl W Schneider; Gordon D Logan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  No-go trials can modulate switch cost by interfering with effects of task preparation.

Authors:  Agatha Lenartowicz; Nick Yeung; Jonathan D Cohen
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2010-05-16
View more
  2 in total

1.  [Neural dynamics of cognitive flexibility: spatiotemporal analysis of event-related potentials].

Authors:  Yuan Cao; Shu Zhou; You Wang
Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao       Date:  2017-06-20

2.  Fronto-parietal homotopy in resting-state functional connectivity predicts task-switching performance.

Authors:  Antonino Vallesi; Antonino Visalli; Zeus Gracia-Tabuenca; Vincenza Tarantino; Mariagrazia Capizzi; Sarael Alcauter; Dante Mantini; Lorenzo Pini
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 3.270

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.