Literature DB >> 16558429

The effects of spatting and ankle taping on inversion before and after exercise.

T S Pederson1, M D Ricard, G Merrill, S S Schulthies, P E Allsen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of spatting, taping and spatting, taping, and not taping on the amount and rate of inversion of the ankle before and after exercise. DESIGN AND
SETTING: We filmed subjects at 60 Hz while they stood on a platform that suddenly inverted the right ankle. Five trials were measured before and after a 30-minute period of drills.
SUBJECTS: We tested 15 male rugby players with no history of lower-leg injury within the previous 6 months limiting activity for more than 2 days. MEASUREMENTS: The amount and rate of inversion in the four conditions were digitized and analyzed.
RESULTS: The combination of spatting and taping was the most effective in reducing inversion rate and range of motion before and after exercise.
CONCLUSIONS: All three taping treatments were effective in reducing the amount and rate of inversion. Exercise loosened the tape, but there may be a functional restriction of the amount and rate of inversion after exercise.

Entities:  

Year:  1997        PMID: 16558429      PMCID: PMC1319232     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Athl Train        ISSN: 1062-6050            Impact factor:   2.860


  12 in total

1.  The measurable support of the ankle joint by conventional methods of taping.

Authors:  G L RARICK; G BIGLEY; R KARST; R M MALINA
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1962-09       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Analysis of athletic performance with prophylactic ankle devices.

Authors:  R T Burks; B G Bean; R Marcus; H B Barker
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1991 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.202

3.  The effect of external ankle support in chronic lateral ankle joint instability. An electromyographic study.

Authors:  J Karlsson; G O Andreasson
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1992 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.202

4.  The Effects of the Swede-O, New Cross, and McDavid Ankle Braces and Adhesive Ankle Taping on Speed, Balance, Agility, and Vertical Jump.

Authors:  D L Paris
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.860

5.  The frequency of injury, mechanism of injury, and epidemiology of ankle sprains.

Authors:  J G Garrick
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1977 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.202

6.  Retrospective comparison of taping and ankle stabilizers in preventing ankle injuries.

Authors:  G D Rovere; T J Clarke; C S Yates; K Burley
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1988 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.202

7.  Accuracy of three-dimensional linear and angular estimates obtained with the Ariel Performance Analysis System.

Authors:  P J Klein; J J DeHaven
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 3.966

8.  The effect of taping on ankle mobility following moderate exercise.

Authors:  H H Morris; W Musnicki
Journal:  J Sports Med Phys Fitness       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 1.637

9.  Ankle injuries in athletics.

Authors:  R P Mack
Journal:  Clin Sports Med       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 2.182

10.  Electromyographic response of peroneal muscles in surgical and nonsurgical injured ankles during sudden inversion.

Authors:  M B Johnson; C L Johnson
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 4.751

View more
  8 in total

1.  Efficacy of Prophylactic Ankle Support: An Experimental Perspective.

Authors:  Mitchell L Cordova; Christopher D Ingersoll; Riann M Palmieri
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.860

2.  Biomechanical and Neuromuscular Effects of Ankle Taping and Bracing.

Authors:  Gary B Wilkerson
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.860

3.  Collegiate Football Players' Ankle Range of Motion and Dynamic Balance in Braced and Self-Adherent-Taped Conditions.

Authors:  Kristin Willeford; Justin M Stanek; Todd A McLoda
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 2.860

4.  Muscle activation following sudden ankle inversion during standing and walking.

Authors:  J Ty Hopkins; Todd McLoda; Steve McCaw
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2006-12-13       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Effects of high-top and low-top shoes on ankle inversion.

Authors:  M D Ricard; S S Schulties; J J Saret
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.860

6.  Effects of tape and exercise on dynamic ankle inversion.

Authors:  M D Ricard; S M Sherwood; S S Schulthies; K L Knight
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.860

7.  Ankle Spatting Compared to Bracing or Taping during Maximal-Effort Sprint Drills.

Authors:  Grant D Reuter; Angela R Dahl; David S Senchina
Journal:  Int J Exerc Sci       Date:  2011-01-15

Review 8.  Review of ankle inversion sprain simulators in the biomechanics laboratory.

Authors:  Sophia Chui-Wai Ha; Daniel Tik-Pui Fong; Kai-Ming Chan
Journal:  Asia Pac J Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Technol       Date:  2015-10-21
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.