Literature DB >> 16558605

Effects of tape and exercise on dynamic ankle inversion.

M D Ricard1, S M Sherwood, S S Schulthies, K L Knight.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of tape, with and without prewrap, on dynamic ankle inversion before and after exercise. DESIGN AND
SETTING: Doubly multivariate analyses of variance were used to compare the taping and exercise conditions. Subjects were randomly assigned to a fixed treatment order as determined by a balanced latin square. The independent variables were tape application (no tape, tape with prewrap, tape to skin) and exercise (before and after). The dependent variables were average inversion velocity, total inversion, maximum inversion velocity, and time to maximum inversion.
SUBJECTS: Thirty college-age male and female students (17 males, 13 females; mean age = 24.9 +/- 4.3 years, range, 19 to 39 years) were tested. Subjects were excluded from the study if they exhibited a painful gait or painful range of motion or had a past history of ankle surgery or an ankle sprain within the past 4 weeks. MEASUREMENTS: We collected data using electronic goniometers while subjects balanced on the right leg on an inversion platform tilted about the medial-lateral axis to produce 15 degrees of plantar flexion. Sudden ankle inversion was induced by pulling the inversion platform support, allowing the platform support base to rotate 37 degrees . Ten satisfactory trials were recorded on the inversion platform before and after a prescribed exercise bout. We calculated total inversion, time to maximum inversion, average inversion velocity, and maximum inversion velocity after sudden inversion.
RESULTS: We found no significant differences between taping to the skin and taping over prewrap for any of the variables measured. There were significant differences between both taping conditions and no-tape postexercise for average inversion velocity, maximum inversion, maximum inversion velocity, and time to maximum inversion. The total inversion mean for no-tape postexercise was 38.8 degrees +/- 6.3 degrees , whereas the means for tape and skin and for tape and prewrap were 28.3 degrees +/- 4.6 degrees and 29.1 degrees +/- 4.7 degrees , respectively. After exercise, inversion increased by 1.0 degrees +/- 2.8 degrees for the no-tape condition, whereas the tape-to-skin and tape-over-prewrap inversion increased by 2.1 degrees +/- 3.2 degrees and 1.7 degrees +/- 2.2 degrees , respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference in the amount of inversion restriction when taping with prewrap was compared with taping to the skin. Tape and tape with prewrap significantly reduced the average inversion velocity, maximum inversion, maximum inversion velocity, and the time to maximum inversion. Both taping conditions offered residual restriction after exercise.

Entities:  

Year:  2000        PMID: 16558605      PMCID: PMC1323435     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Athl Train        ISSN: 1062-6050            Impact factor:   2.860


  15 in total

1.  Comparison of support provided by a semirigid orthosis and adhesive ankle taping before, during, and after exercise.

Authors:  T A Greene; S K Hillman
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1990 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.202

2.  The effect of external ankle support in chronic lateral ankle joint instability. An electromyographic study.

Authors:  J Karlsson; G O Andreasson
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1992 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.202

3.  Ankle ranges of motion during extended activity periods while taped and braced.

Authors:  D L Paris; J Kokkaliaris; V Vardaxis
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 2.860

4.  The effects of semirigid Air-Stirrup bracing vs. adhesive ankle taping on motor performance.

Authors:  J D Verbrugge
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 4.751

5.  Retrospective comparison of taping and ankle stabilizers in preventing ankle injuries.

Authors:  G D Rovere; T J Clarke; C S Yates; K Burley
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1988 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.202

6.  Role of external support in the prevention of ankle sprains.

Authors:  J G Garrick; R K Requa
Journal:  Med Sci Sports       Date:  1973

7.  The measured effect of taping on combined foot and ankle motion before and after exercise.

Authors:  R M Fumich; A E Ellison; G J Guerin; P D Grace
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1981 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.202

8.  Effect of underwrap conditions on the supportive effectiveness of ankle strapping with tape.

Authors:  F G Delacerda
Journal:  J Sports Med Phys Fitness       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 1.637

9.  The effect of exercise, prewrap, and athletic tape on the maximal active and passive ankle resistance of ankle inversion.

Authors:  P P Manfroy; J A Ashton-Miller; E M Wojtys
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1997 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.202

10.  The role of external nonrigid ankle bracing in limiting ankle inversion.

Authors:  D L Anderson; D J Sanderson; E M Hennig
Journal:  Clin J Sport Med       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.638

View more
  12 in total

1.  An Examination of the Stretch-Shortening Cycle of the Dorsiflexors and Evertors in Uninjured and Functionally Unstable Ankles.

Authors:  Gary K Porter; Thomas W Kaminski; Brian Hatzel; Michael E Powers; MaryBeth Horodyski
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.860

2.  Efficacy of Prophylactic Ankle Support: An Experimental Perspective.

Authors:  Mitchell L Cordova; Christopher D Ingersoll; Riann M Palmieri
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.860

3.  Biomechanical and Neuromuscular Effects of Ankle Taping and Bracing.

Authors:  Gary B Wilkerson
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.860

4.  Effects of Preventative Ankle Taping on Planned Change-of-Direction and Reactive Agility Performance and Ankle Muscle Activity in Basketballers.

Authors:  Matthew D Jeffriess; Adrian B Schultz; Tye S McGann; Samuel J Callaghan; Robert G Lockie
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 2.988

5.  Collegiate Football Players' Ankle Range of Motion and Dynamic Balance in Braced and Self-Adherent-Taped Conditions.

Authors:  Kristin Willeford; Justin M Stanek; Todd A McLoda
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 2.860

6.  Effects of high-top and low-top shoes on ankle inversion.

Authors:  M D Ricard; S S Schulties; J J Saret
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.860

7.  The effects of two adhesive ankle-taping methods on strength, power, and range of motion in female athletes.

Authors:  Katherine E Quackenbush; Paula R J Barker; Shauna M Stone Fury; David G Behm
Journal:  N Am J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2008-02

8.  Foot structure and muscle reaction time to a simulated ankle sprain.

Authors:  Joanna R Denyer; Naomi L A Hewitt; Andrew C S Mitchell
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 2.860

9.  Using Ankle Bracing and Taping to Decrease Range of Motion and Velocity During Inversion Perturbation While Walking.

Authors:  Emily A Hall; Janet E Simon; Carrie L Docherty
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 2.860

10.  Effects of Lower-Leg Kinesiology Taping on Balance Ability in Stroke Patients with Foot Drop.

Authors:  Young-Hyeon Bae; Hyeong Geun Kim; Kyung Sam Min; Suk Min Lee
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 2.629

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.