Literature DB >> 8298631

Electromyographic response of peroneal muscles in surgical and nonsurgical injured ankles during sudden inversion.

M B Johnson1, C L Johnson.   

Abstract

Because the peroneal muscles are thought to act as a safeguard against lateral ankle injury, it is important to study their function. This study was undertaken to electromyographically assess the latency between sudden unexpected ankle inversion and the start of peroneal muscle activity. Three groups participated in the study, including subjects with lateral ankle sprain rehabilitated nonsurgically (N = 7), sprains rehabilitated following surgery (N = 6), and injury-free ankles (N = 11). Peroneal latency was assessed by dropping the subjects into inversion from a special platform. The platform was designed so that either ankle could be inverted to 35 degrees without warning. The ANOVA revealed no significant latency differences (p > .05) between the three groups. The study suggests that bilateral peroneal latency is unaffected by injury. Although it has been thought that healthy muscles provide a defense against ankle sprain, their latency is not permanently affected by ankle injury or by surgery performed to correct defects from injury. It appears that mechanoreceptor impairment may be rehabilitated and that it is not a factor in ankle injury.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8298631     DOI: 10.2519/jospt.1993.18.3.497

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther        ISSN: 0190-6011            Impact factor:   4.751


  18 in total

Review 1.  Functional instability following lateral ankle sprain.

Authors:  J Hertel
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Peroneus longus stretch reflex amplitude increases after ankle brace application.

Authors:  M L Cordova; C D Ingersoll
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 13.800

3.  Reflex responses in the lower leg following landing impact on an inverting and non-inverting platform.

Authors:  C Grüneberg; P H J A Nieuwenhuijzen; J Duysens
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2003-06-17       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Efficacy of Prophylactic Ankle Support: An Experimental Perspective.

Authors:  Mitchell L Cordova; Christopher D Ingersoll; Riann M Palmieri
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.860

5.  Peroneal Reaction Times and Eversion Motor Response in Healthy and Unstable Ankles.

Authors:  Peter Vaes; William Duquet; Bart Van Gheluwe
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.860

6.  The Sensorimotor System, Part II: The Role of Proprioception in Motor Control and Functional Joint Stability.

Authors:  Bryan L Riemann; Scott M Lephart
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.860

7.  The effects of spatting and ankle taping on inversion before and after exercise.

Authors:  T S Pederson; M D Ricard; G Merrill; S S Schulthies; P E Allsen
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 2.860

8.  Determination of an Optimal Threshold Value for Muscle Activity Detection in EMG Analysis.

Authors:  Kerem Tuncay Ozgünen; Umut Celik; Sanlı Sadi Kurdak
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 2.988

9.  [Neuromuscular deficits in chronic ankle instability. Frequency and significance - multicenter study].

Authors:  R Schmidt; H P Becker; F Rauhut; M Tannheimer
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 1.000

10.  Functional Anatomy, Pathomechanics, and Pathophysiology of Lateral Ankle Instability.

Authors:  Jay Hertel
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.