Literature DB >> 16552520

[Minimally invasive and navigated implantation for total knee arthroplasty: X-ray analysis and early clinical results].

R Hart1, M Janecek, I Cizmár, V Stipcák, B Kucera, P Filan.   

Abstract

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) alignment is one of the most important factors in long-term prosthesis survival. Minimally invasive surgical (MIS) procedures are becoming more common. There may be an increased overall complication rate, especially component malpositioning, due to poor visualisation. The disadvantage of restricted visualisation in the less invasive technique can be compensated by a navigation system. This combined procedure is described in this paper. A total of 40 Search Evolution TKAs were implanted using OrthoPilot navigation in the standard manner, and 40 TKAs were implanted using MIS via a subvastus approach. Primary osteoarthritis of the third or fourth degree, without severe valgus deformity, was the indication. These patients were then selected at random as they came to the institution. The results were evaluated radiologically and clinically.Pain, range of motion, gait and function, and the entire clinical score 10 days after the operation were significantly better in the MIS-group. At 6 and 12 weeks postoperatively, these results were no longer statistically significant. Ideal radiological results were obtained in all cases. No differences in limb axis and component alignment were found after the operation between the navigated groups. MIS is technically very demanding. That is why it should be used only in carefully selected cases. Its advantages occur in the first weeks after the surgery. The long-term results must still be determined.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16552520     DOI: 10.1007/s00132-006-0929-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopade        ISSN: 0085-4530            Impact factor:   1.087


  20 in total

1.  [Navigation in knee endoprosthesis implantation--preliminary experiences and prospective comparative study with conventional implantation technique].

Authors:  R K Mielke; U Clemens; J H Jens; S Kershally
Journal:  Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr

2.  [Navigated implantation of total knee endoprostheses--a comparative study with conventional instrumentation].

Authors:  J Y Jenny; C Boeri
Journal:  Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr

3.  [Knee endoprosthesis: aspects of surgical techniques].

Authors:  D Kohn; S Rupp
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  Minimally invasive unicompartmental knee replacement with a nonimage-based navigation system.

Authors:  L Perlick; H Bäthis; M Tingart; C Perlick; C Lüring; J Grifka
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2004-03-06       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Minimally invasive knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Thomas Parker Vail
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Computer assisted knee replacement.

Authors:  S L Delp; S D Stulberg; B Davies; F Picard; F Leitner
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system.

Authors:  J N Insall; L D Dorr; R D Scott; W N Scott
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Alignment and long-term clinical results of a semiconstrained knee prosthesis.

Authors:  B Jonsson; J Aström
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Tibiofemoral alignment and the results of knee replacement.

Authors:  M Tew; W Waugh
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1985-08

10.  Minimal incision total knee arthroplasty: early experience.

Authors:  Alfred J Tria; Thomas M Coon
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  14 in total

1.  [Variance of identification of femoral epicondyles in navigated total knee arthroplasty].

Authors:  G Matziolis; D Krocker; S Tohtz; C Perka
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  [Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty and navigation - a logical combination?].

Authors:  C Lüring; M Tingart; J Beckmann; L Perlick; J Grifka
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Minimal invasive and computer assisted total knee replacement compared with the conventional technique: a prospective, randomised trial.

Authors:  C Lüring; J Beckmann; P Haiböck; L Perlick; J Grifka; M Tingart
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2008-07-17       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Accuracy of side-cutting implantation instruments for total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Arno Martin; Mitchell B Sheinkop; Mary M Langhenry; Christian Oelsch; Mark Widemschek; Archibald von Strempel
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-01-09       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Minimally invasive and computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty versus conventional technique: a prospective, randomized study.

Authors:  Zhenxiang Zhang; Beibei Gu; Wei Zhu; Lixian Zhu; Qingsong Li; Yaqing Du
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2013-09-20

6.  The risk of notching the anterior femoral cortex with the use of navigation systems in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Yukihide Minoda; Akio Kobayashi; Hiroyoshi Iwaki; Ikebuchi Mitsuhiko; Yoshinori Kadoya; Hirotsugu Ohashi; Kunio Takaoka; Hiroaki Nakamura
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-09-26       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Minimally invasive subvastus approach: improving the results of total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized trial.

Authors:  José Ramón Varela-Egocheaga; Miguel Angel Suárez-Suárez; María Fernández-Villán; Vanessa González-Sastre; José Ramón Varela-Gómez; Carlos Rodríguez-Merchán
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Comparison of two minimally invasive implantation instrument-sets for total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Arno Martin; Mitchell B Sheinkop; Mary M Langhenry; Mark Widemschek; Thomas Benesch; Archibald von Strempel
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-10-22       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 9.  Rationale for and methods of superiority, noninferiority, or equivalence designs in orthopaedic, controlled trials.

Authors:  Patrick Vavken
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-01-19       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Comparison of two minimally invasive implantation instrument-sets for total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Yasuo Niki
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.