Literature DB >> 17972062

[Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty and navigation - a logical combination?].

C Lüring1, M Tingart, J Beckmann, L Perlick, J Grifka.   

Abstract

The minimally invasive approach has been recommended for total knee arthroplasty by many surgeons and by industry in recent years, and patients now also expect it. The definition of a minimally invasive procedure is still the subject of some controversy. Some authors limit the length of the skin incision to 14 cm, while others propose the"least possible and barely adequate" approach. The main problem of the minimally invasive technique is still the increased risk of component malalignment owing to reduced visibility. As computer-assisted surgery has been shown in many studies to yield better component alignment than is obtained with the conventional technique, it seemed logical to use navigation systems in combination with the minimal invasive approach. The aim of this paper is to highlight and discuss the use of computer assistance with a minimally invasive approach.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17972062     DOI: 10.1007/s00132-007-1161-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopade        ISSN: 0085-4530            Impact factor:   1.087


  30 in total

1.  [Navigation in knee endoprosthesis implantation--preliminary experiences and prospective comparative study with conventional implantation technique].

Authors:  R K Mielke; U Clemens; J H Jens; S Kershally
Journal:  Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr

2.  Bone cutting errors in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Christopher Plaskos; Antony J Hodgson; Kevin Inkpen; Robert W McGraw
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  Alignment in total knee arthroplasty. A comparison of computer-assisted surgery with the conventional technique.

Authors:  H Bäthis; L Perlick; M Tingart; C Lüring; D Zurakowski; J Grifka
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2004-07

4.  Intraoperative cutting errors in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  H Bäthis; L Perlick; M Tingart; C Perlick; C Lüring; J Grifka
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2004-11-09       Impact factor: 3.067

5.  Computer assisted navigation in total knee arthroplasty: comparison with conventional methods.

Authors:  Kevin C Anderson; Knute C Buehler; David C Markel
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.757

6.  Total knee arthroplasty with conventional or navigated technique: comparison of the learning curves in a community hospital.

Authors:  François Daubresse; Cyprien Vajeu; Jean Loquet
Journal:  Acta Orthop Belg       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 0.500

7.  [Minimally invasive and navigated implantation for total knee arthroplasty: X-ray analysis and early clinical results].

Authors:  R Hart; M Janecek; I Cizmár; V Stipcák; B Kucera; P Filan
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 1.087

8.  Navigated total knee replacement. A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kai Bauwens; Gerrit Matthes; Michael Wich; Florian Gebhard; Beate Hanson; Axel Ekkernkamp; Dirk Stengel
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 9.  [Are computer assisted total knee replacements more accurately placed? A meta-analysis of comparative studies].

Authors:  H Bäthis; S Shafizadeh; T Paffrath; C Simanski; J Grifka; C Lüring
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 1.087

10.  Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Peter M Bonutti; Michael A Mont; Margo McMahon; Phillip S Ragland; Mark Kester
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  1 in total

1.  [Computer-assisted total knee replacement (TKR) using Orthopilot navigation system].

Authors:  Michael N Magin
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.154

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.