Literature DB >> 11386099

[Navigated implantation of total knee endoprostheses--a comparative study with conventional instrumentation].

J Y Jenny1, C Boeri.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: A navigation system should improve the quality of a total knee prosthesis implantation in comparison to the classical, surgeon-controlled operative technique.
METHODS: The authors have implanted 40 knee total prostheses with an optical infrared navigation system (Orthopilot AESCULAP, Tuttlingen--group A). The quality of implantation was studied on postoperative long leg AP and lateral X-rays, and compared to a control group of 40 computer-paired total knee prostheses o the same model (Search Prosthesis, AESCULAP, Tuttlingen) implanted with a classical, surgeon-controlled technique (group B).
RESULTS: An optimal mechanical femorotibial angle (3 degrees valgus to 3 degrees varus) was obtained by 33 cases in group A and 31 cases in group B (p > 0.05). Better results were seen for the coronal and sagittal orientation of both tibial and femoral components in group A. Globally, 26 cases of the group A and 12 cases of the group B were implanted in an optimal manner for all studied criteria (p < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: The used navigation system allows a significant improvement of the quality of implantation of a knee total prosthesis in comparison to a classical, surgeon-controlled instrumentation. Long-term outcome could be consequently improved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11386099     DOI: 10.1055/s-2001-15041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb        ISSN: 0044-3220


  8 in total

1.  Radiological results of image-based and non-image-based computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  H Bäthis; L Perlick; M Tingart; C Lüring; C Perlick; J Grifka
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2004-01-17       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Revision total knee arthroplasty: a comparison of postoperative leg alignment after computer-assisted implantation versus the conventional technique.

Authors:  Lars Perlick; Holger Bäthis; Carsten Perlick; Christian Lüring; Markus Tingart; Joachim Grifka
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2004-04-08       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  No difference in ROM and knee function between mobile and floating platforms in TKA.

Authors:  Johannes Holinka; Navid Bahrami; Richard Lass; Sophie Frantal; Reinhard Windhager; Hugo Axel Wanivenhaus
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  [Minimally invasive and navigated implantation for total knee arthroplasty: X-ray analysis and early clinical results].

Authors:  R Hart; M Janecek; I Cizmár; V Stipcák; B Kucera; P Filan
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 1.087

5.  Total knee arthroplasty implanted with and without kinematic navigation.

Authors:  R Hart; M Janecek; A Chaker; P Bucek
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2003-08-26       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Evaluation of alignment in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective study.

Authors:  K S Manjunath; K G Gopalakrishna; G Vineeth
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2015-05-31

7.  Comparison of the radiological results between fluoroscopy-assisted and navigation-guided total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Young-Bok Jung; Han-Jun Lee; Ho-Joong Jung; Kwang-Sup Song; Jae-Sung Lee; Jae Jun Yang
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2008-12-23       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  [Post-traumatic osteoarthritis of the knee: special indication for navigated TKA].

Authors:  A Martin; O Wohlgenannt; M Prenn; A von Strempel
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.000

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.