Literature DB >> 15007563

Minimally invasive unicompartmental knee replacement with a nonimage-based navigation system.

L Perlick1, H Bäthis, M Tingart, C Perlick, C Lüring, J Grifka.   

Abstract

In a prospective study, two groups of 20 unicompartmental knee replacements (UKR) each were operated either using a CT-free navigation system or the conventional minimal invasive technique. Radiographic assessment of postoperative alignment was performed by long-leg coronal and lateral radiographs. The results revealed a significant difference between the two groups in favor of navigation. In the computer-assisted group, 95% of UKRs were in a range of 4-0 degrees varus (mechanical axis) compared with 70% in the conventional group. The only inconvenience was a prolonged operation time (+19 min). Due to the limited exposure, the navigation system is helpful in achieving a more precise component orientation. The danger of overcorrection is diminished by real-time information about the leg axis at each step during the operation.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15007563      PMCID: PMC3456933          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-004-0549-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  19 in total

Review 1.  Unicondylar arthroplasty: an option for high-demand patients with gonarthrosis.

Authors:  G A Engh; J P McAuley
Journal:  Instr Course Lect       Date:  1999

Review 2.  Unicompartmental knee replacement: some unanswered questions.

Authors:  R S Laskin
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Computer-assisted implantation of total knee prostheses: a case-control comparative study with classical instrumentation.

Authors:  J Y Jenny; C Boeri
Journal:  Comput Aided Surg       Date:  2001

4.  [Navigation in knee endoprosthesis implantation--preliminary experiences and prospective comparative study with conventional implantation technique].

Authors:  R K Mielke; U Clemens; J H Jens; S Kershally
Journal:  Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr

5.  Accuracy of implantation of a unicompartmental total knee arthroplasty with 2 different instrumentations: a case-controlled comparative study.

Authors:  Jean-Yves Jenny; Cyril Boeri
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.757

6.  St. Georg sledge for medial compartment knee replacement. 461 arthroplasties followed for 4 (1-17) years.

Authors:  S Ansari; J H Newman; C E Ackroyd
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1997-10

7.  Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty surgery. 10-year minimum follow-up period.

Authors:  P Cartier; J L Sanouiller; R P Grelsamer
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 8.  Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: long-term results.

Authors:  R V Deshmukh; R D Scott
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Total knee replacement in young, active patients. Long-term follow-up and functional outcome.

Authors:  D R Diduch; J N Insall; W N Scott; G R Scuderi; D Font-Rodriguez
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Minimally invasive surgical technique for unicondylar knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  J A Repicci; R W Eberle
Journal:  J South Orthop Assoc       Date:  1999
View more
  17 in total

1.  [Is computer navigation a useful tool in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty? A pilot cadaver study].

Authors:  P R Aldinger; H S Gill; U Schlegel; M Schneider; M Clauss; J W Goodfellow; D W Murray; S J Breusch
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  [Minimally invasive unicondylar knee replacement with computer navigation].

Authors:  R G Haaker; M Wojciechowski; P Patzer; R E Willburger; M Senkal; M Engelhardt
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 3.  [Precision in orthopaedic computer navigation].

Authors:  T Hüfner; D Kendoff; M Citak; J Geerling; C Krettek
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  [Minimally invasive implantation in unicondylar arthroplasty].

Authors:  R Hube; M Keim
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.087

5.  [Minimally invasive and navigated implantation for total knee arthroplasty: X-ray analysis and early clinical results].

Authors:  R Hart; M Janecek; I Cizmár; V Stipcák; B Kucera; P Filan
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 1.087

6.  Computer-assisted FluoroGuide navigation of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Burton Ma; John Rudan; Raja Chakravertty; Heather Grant
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 2.089

7.  Navigation of the tibial plateau alone appears to be sufficient in computer-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Dominique Saragaglia; Frédéric Picard; Ramsay Refaie
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-10-16       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Improved accuracy in computer-assisted unicondylar knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Patrick Weber; Alexander Crispin; Florian Schmidutz; Sandra Utzschneider; Matthias F Pietschmann; Volkmar Jansson; Peter E Müller
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Is tibial cut navigation alone sufficient in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty? Continuous series of fifty nine procedures.

Authors:  Thomas Gicquel; Jean Christophe Lambotte; Jean Louis Polard; Mickael Ropars; Denis Huten
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  Leg axis correction with ConforMIS iForma (interpositional device) in unicompartmental arthritis of the knee.

Authors:  Franz Xaver Koeck; Lars Perlick; Christian Luring; Martin Handel; Johannes Beckmann; Oliver Linhardt; Joachim Grifka
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-06-19       Impact factor: 3.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.