Literature DB >> 21717217

Comparison of two minimally invasive implantation instrument-sets for total knee arthroplasty.

Yasuo Niki.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2011        PMID： 21717217     DOI： 10.1007/s00167-011-1578-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN： 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


× No keyword cloud information.
  13 in total

1.  Bone cutting errors in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Christopher Plaskos; Antony J Hodgson; Kevin Inkpen; Robert W McGraw
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  Navigation-assisted less invasive total knee arthroplasty compared with conventional total knee arthroplasty: a randomized prospective trial.

Authors:  Jong Keun Seon; Eun Kyoo Song
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  Quadriceps sparing total knee replacement. The initial experience with results at two to four years.

Authors:  A F Chen; R K Alan; D E Redziniak; A J Tria
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2006-11

4.  Mini-incision versus mini-incision and computer-assisted surgery in total knee replacement: a radiological prospective randomised study.

Authors:  Norberto Confalonieri; Alfonso Manzotti; Chris Pullen; Vincenza Ragone
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2007-09-19       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Randomized controlled trial comparing the radiologic outcomes of conventional and minimally invasive techniques for total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Pak Lin Chin; Leon Siang Shen Foo; Kuang Ying Yang; Seng Jin Yeo; Ngai Nung Lo
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2007-04-20       Impact factor: 4.757

6.  [Minimally invasive and navigated implantation for total knee arthroplasty: X-ray analysis and early clinical results].

Authors:  R Hart; M Janecek; I Cizmár; V Stipcák; B Kucera; P Filan
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 1.087

7.  Surgical accuracy with the mini-subvastus total knee arthroplasty a computer tomography scan analysis of postoperative implant alignment.

Authors:  William C Schroer; Paul J Diesfeld; Mary E Reedy; Angela R Lemarr
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2007-11-07       Impact factor: 4.757

8.  Accuracy of implant positioning for minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty in patients with severe varus deformity.

Authors:  Yasuo Niki; Hideo Matsumoto; Toshiro Otani; Hiroyuki Enomoto; Yoshiaki Toyama; Yasunori Suda
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.757

9.  Mini-incision total knee arthroplasty can increase risk of component malalignment.

Authors:  David F Dalury; Douglas A Dennis
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Computer-assisted minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty compared with standard total knee arthroplasty. A prospective, randomized study.

Authors:  Andrew Quoc Dutton; Seng-Jin Yeo; Kuang-Ying Yang; Ngai-Nung Lo; Kui-Un Chia; Hwei-Chi Chong
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 5.284
View more
  1 in total

1.  Effects of four different surgical approaches on intra-operative joint gap in posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Yasuo Niki; Yuki Takeda; Hiroya Kanagawa; Wataru Iwamoto; Hideo Matsumoto; Hiroyuki Enomoto; Yoshiaki Toyama; Yasunori Suda
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-12-08       Impact factor: 4.342
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.