Literature DB >> 16547107

Rates and patterns of chromosomal evolution in Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. miranda.

Carolina Bartolomé1, Brian Charlesworth.   

Abstract

Comparisons of gene orders between species permit estimation of the rate of chromosomal evolution since their divergence from a common ancestor. We have compared gene orders on three chromosomes of Drosophila pseudoobscura with its close relative, D. miranda, and the distant outgroup species, D. melanogaster, by using the public genome sequences of D. pseudoobscura and D. melanogaster and approximately 50 in situ hybridizations of gene probes in D. miranda. We find no evidence for extensive transfer of genes among chromosomes in D. miranda. The rates of chromosomal rearrangements between D. miranda and D. pseudoobscura are far higher than those found before in Drosophila and approach those for nematodes, the fastest rates among higher eukaryotes. In addition, we find that the D. pseudoobscura chromosome with the highest level of inversion polymorphism (Muller's element C) does not show an unusually fast rate of evolution with respect to chromosome structure, suggesting that this classic case of inversion polymorphism reflects selection rather than mutational processes. On the basis of our results, we propose possible ancestral arrangements for the D. pseudoobscura C chromosome, which are different from those in the current literature. We also describe a new method for correcting for rearrangements that are not detected with a limited set of markers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16547107      PMCID: PMC1526542          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.105.054585

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  44 in total

1.  Reduced sequence variability on the Neo-Y chromosome of Drosophila americana americana.

Authors:  B F McAllister; B Charlesworth
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Maintenance of a large pericentric inversion generated by the hobo transposable element in a transgenic line of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  S Aulard; P Vaudin; V Ladevèze; N Chaminade; G Périquet; F Lemeunier
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.821

3.  Mechanisms of genetic exchange within the chromosomal inversions of Drosophila pseudoobscura.

Authors:  Stephen W Schaeffer; Wyatt W Anderson
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-09-02       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  How malleable is the eukaryotic genome? Extreme rate of chromosomal rearrangement in the genus Drosophila.

Authors:  J M Ranz; F Casals; A Ruiz
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 9.043

5.  A framework physical map of Drosophila virilis based on P1 clones: applications in genome evolution.

Authors:  J Vieira; C P Vieira; D L Hartl; E R Lozovskaya
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 4.316

6.  Molecular organization of the X chromosome in different species of the obscura group of Drosophila.

Authors:  C Segarra; M Aguadé
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Chromosomal homology and molecular organization of Muller's elements D and E in the Drosophila repleta species group.

Authors:  J M Ranz; C Segarra; A Ruiz
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  A survey of chromosomal and nucleotide sequence variation in Drosophila miranda.

Authors:  Soojin Yi; Doris Bachtrog; Brian Charlesworth
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Temporal patterns of fruit fly (Drosophila) evolution revealed by mutation clocks.

Authors:  Koichiro Tamura; Sankar Subramanian; Sudhir Kumar
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2003-08-29       Impact factor: 16.240

10.  Degenerating Y chromosome of Drosophila miranda: a trap for retrotransposons.

Authors:  M Steinemann; S Steinemann
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-08-15       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  18 in total

1.  Evolution of amino-acid sequences and codon usage on the Drosophila miranda neo-sex chromosomes.

Authors:  Carolina Bartolomé; Brian Charlesworth
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-10-08       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Charlesworth et al. on Background Selection and Neutral Diversity.

Authors:  Stephen I Wright
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Testing chromosomal phylogenies and inversion breakpoint reuse in Drosophila.

Authors:  Josefa González; Ferran Casals; Alfredo Ruiz
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-10-08       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Gene alterations at Drosophila inversion breakpoints provide prima facie evidence for natural selection as an explanation for rapid chromosomal evolution.

Authors:  Yolanda Guillén; Alfredo Ruiz
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 3.969

5.  Revisiting the Impact of Inversions in Evolution: From Population Genetic Markers to Drivers of Adaptive Shifts and Speciation?

Authors:  Ary A Hoffmann; Loren H Rieseberg
Journal:  Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 13.915

6.  Chromosomal rearrangement inferred from comparisons of 12 Drosophila genomes.

Authors:  Arjun Bhutkar; Stephen W Schaeffer; Susan M Russo; Mu Xu; Temple F Smith; William M Gelbart
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-07-13       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Phylogenetic and genomewide analyses suggest a functional relationship between kayak, the Drosophila fos homolog, and fig, a predicted protein phosphatase 2c nested within a kayak intron.

Authors:  Stephanie G Hudson; Matthew J Garrett; Joseph W Carlson; Gos Micklem; Susan E Celniker; Elliott S Goldstein; Stuart J Newfeld
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  High incidence of interchromosomal transpositions in the evolutionary history of a subset of or genes in Drosophila.

Authors:  Inês C Conceição; Montserrat Aguadé
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2008-03-11       Impact factor: 2.395

9.  Patterns of DNA-sequence divergence between Drosophila miranda and D. pseudoobscura.

Authors:  Sophie Marion de Procé; Daniel L Halligan; Peter D Keightley; Brian Charlesworth
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2009-10-27       Impact factor: 2.395

10.  Recombination modulates how selection affects linked sites in Drosophila.

Authors:  Suzanne E McGaugh; Caiti S S Heil; Brenda Manzano-Winkler; Laurence Loewe; Steve Goldstein; Tiffany L Himmel; Mohamed A F Noor
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2012-11-13       Impact factor: 8.029

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.