Literature DB >> 16541226

Microbubbles assist goat liver ablation by high intensity focused ultrasound.

Tinghe Yu1, Xionglin Fan, Shuhua Xiong, Kai Hu, Zhibiao Wang.   

Abstract

High intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) has been introduced to treat cancers. However, this therapy is a time-consuming procedure; destructing a deeper volume is also difficult as ultrasonic energy attenuates exponentially with increasing depth in tissues. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of introducing microbubbles on liver HIFU ablation. Seventeen goats were divided into groups A (n=8) and B (n=9). The livers in both groups were ablated using HIFU (1.0 MHz, 22,593 W/cm2) performed in the manner of a clinical regime using a clinical device. A microbubble agent was bolus-injected intravenously before HIFU exposure in group B. All animals in group A and seven goats in group B were euthanased to evaluate the ablation efficiency 24 h after HIFU. The necrosis rate (mm3/s), which was the volume of necrosis tissue per second of HIFU exposure, was used to judge the ablation efficiency. Pathological examinations were performed to determine whether there were residual intact tissues within the exposed volume. The other two goats in group B were used to determine the delayed pathological changes 7 days after ultrasonic ablation. The necrosis rate (mm3/s) was increased in group B (14.4647+/-4.1960 versus 33.5302+/-12.4484, P=0.0059). Pathological examinations confirmed that there were no residual unaffected tissue focuses within the exposed volume. Two remarkable changes occurred in the other two goats in group B 7 days after HIFU: there were ghost-cell islands at the periphery of the ablated tissues, and surrounding adjacent tissues outside the reactive zone necrotized. These findings showed that microbubbles could be used to assist liver HIFU ablation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16541226     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-006-0176-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  30 in total

1.  Use of overpressure to assess the role of bubbles in focused ultrasound lesion shape in vitro.

Authors:  M R Bailey; L N Couret; O A Sapozhnikov; V A Khokhlova; G ter Haar; S Vaezy; X Shi; R Martin; L A Crum
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.998

Review 2.  Microbubbles and ultrasound: from diagnosis to therapy.

Authors:  P A Dijkmans; L J M Juffermans; R J P Musters; A van Wamel; F J ten Cate; W van Gilst; C A Visser; N de Jong; O Kamp
Journal:  Eur J Echocardiogr       Date:  2004-08

Review 3.  Microbubbles in medical imaging: current applications and future directions.

Authors:  Jonathan R Lindner
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 84.694

Review 4.  Focal liver lesions: evaluation with contrast-enhanced ultrasonography.

Authors:  C Nicolau; C Brú
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  2004 May-Jun

5.  Use of a microbubble agent to increase the effects of high intensity focused ultrasound on liver tissue.

Authors:  Yukio Kaneko; Toshiyuki Maruyama; Kenji Takegami; Toshiaki Watanabe; Hiroshi Mitsui; Kazuyuki Hanajiri; Hirokazu Nagawa; Yoichiro Matsumoto
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-03-01       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  MRI-guided gas bubble enhanced ultrasound heating in in vivo rabbit thigh.

Authors:  S D Sokka; R King; K Hynynen
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2003-01-21       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  A microbubble agent improves the therapeutic efficiency of high intensity focused ultrasound: a rabbit kidney study.

Authors:  Tinghe Yu; Guoyun Wang; Kai Hu; Ping Ma; Jin Bai; Zhibiao Wang
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2003-12-04

Review 8.  The powerful microbubble: from bench to bedside, from intravascular indicator to therapeutic delivery system, and beyond.

Authors:  Steven B Feinstein
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.733

9.  Effects of high-energy focused ultrasound on kidney tissue in the rat and the dog.

Authors:  J Y Chapelon; J Margonari; Y Theillère; F Gorry; F Vernier; E Blanc; A Gelet
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 20.096

10.  Extracorporeal high intensity focused ultrasound ablation in the treatment of patients with large hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Feng Wu; Zhi-Biao Wang; Wen-Zhi Chen; Hui Zhu; Jin Bai; Jian-Zhong Zou; Ke-Quan Li; Cheng-Bing Jin; Fang-Lin Xie; Hai-Bing Su
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2004-11-15       Impact factor: 5.344

View more
  12 in total

1.  Complications of high intensity focused ultrasound in patients with recurrent and metastatic abdominal tumors.

Authors:  Jian-Jun Li; Guo-Liang Xu; Mo-Fa Gu; Guang-Yu Luo; Zhang Rong; Pei-Hong Wu; Jian-Chuan Xia
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-05-21       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Prevention of post-focal thermal damage by formation of bubbles at the focus during high intensity focused ultrasound therapy.

Authors:  Vesna Zderic; Jessica Foley; Wenbo Luo; Shahram Vaezy
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Phase-shift perfluorocarbon agents enhance high intensity focused ultrasound thermal delivery with reduced near-field heating.

Authors:  Linsey C Phillips; Connor Puett; Paul S Sheeran; G Wilson Miller; Terry O Matsunaga; Paul A Dayton
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Microbubbles improve the ablation efficiency of extracorporeal high intensity focused ultrasound against kidney tissues.

Authors:  Tinghe Yu; Dingrong Hu; Chuanshan Xu
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2008-07-02       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Production of uniformly sized serum albumin and dextrose microbubbles.

Authors:  Michael J Borrelli; William D O'Brien; Laura J Bernock; Heather R Williams; Eric Hamilton; Jonah Wu; Michael L Oelze; William C Culp
Journal:  Ultrason Sonochem       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 7.491

6.  Microbubbles in Imaging: Applications Beyond Ultrasound.

Authors:  Paul Kogan; Ryan C Gessner; Paul A Dayton
Journal:  Bubble Sci Eng Technol       Date:  2010-06

7.  Comparison of continuous vs. pulsed focused ultrasound in treated muscle tissue as evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging, histological analysis, and microarray analysis.

Authors:  Walter Hundt; Esther L Yuh; Silke Steinbach; Mark D Bednarski; Samira Guccione
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-01-19       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Assessment of the biodistribution of an [(18) F]FDG-loaded perfluorocarbon double emulsion using dynamic micro-PET in rats.

Authors:  Mario L Fabiilli; Morand R Piert; Robert A Koeppe; Phillip S Sherman; Carole A Quesada; Oliver D Kripfgans
Journal:  Contrast Media Mol Imaging       Date:  2013 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.161

9.  Adverse events of extracorporeal ultrasound-guided high intensity focused ultrasound therapy.

Authors:  Tinghe Yu; Jun Luo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Microbubble-Enhanced Heating: Exploring the Effect of Microbubble Concentration and Pressure Amplitude on High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Treatments.

Authors:  Alicia Clark; Sierra Bonilla; Dingjie Suo; Yeruham Shapira; Michalakis Averkiou
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 3.694

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.