Literature DB >> 14655029

A microbubble agent improves the therapeutic efficiency of high intensity focused ultrasound: a rabbit kidney study.

Tinghe Yu1, Guoyun Wang, Kai Hu, Ping Ma, Jin Bai, Zhibiao Wang.   

Abstract

Eighty kidneys (40 left and 40 right kidneys) of New Zealand rabbits were ablated using high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), (14,300 W/cm(2), 1.0 MHz). Kidneys were randomly divided into two groups. HIFU was performed in the manner of linear scan in both groups. Prior to HIFU, normal saline solution and isovolumetric microbubble agent were administrated intravenously in groups I and II, respectively. HIFU was finished in all left kidneys and in 26/40 right ones. The therapeutic efficiency was reflected using necrosis rate (cubic centimeters per second), which was the tissue volume of coagulative necrosis per 1 s HIFU exposure. In both groups, predetermined volumes were damaged without harming overlying tissues. Necrosis rates were increased in group II both in left (0.0089+/-0.0107 vs. 0.0493+/-0.0777, P=0.0323) and in right (0.0039+/-0.0055 vs. 0.0162+/-0.0168, P=0.0248) kidneys. Pathological examinations confirmed that there were no intact tissue focuses within exposed regions in either group. These findings suggested that the microbubble agent improved the therapeutic efficiency of HIFU. Hemorrhage and hyperemia were also detected on the margin of the ablated tissues (both in cortex and medulla) in both groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14655029     DOI: 10.1007/s00240-003-0362-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Res        ISSN: 0300-5623


  18 in total

1.  Determination of the optimal delay between sonications during focused ultrasound surgery in rabbits by using MR imaging to monitor thermal buildup in vivo.

Authors:  N J McDannold; F A Jolesz; K H Hynynen
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 2.  A review of therapeutic ultrasound: biophysical effects.

Authors:  K G Baker; V J Robertson; F A Duck
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2001-07

Review 3.  Microbubble contrast agents: a new era in ultrasound.

Authors:  M J Blomley; J C Cooke; E C Unger; M J Monaghan; D O Cosgrove
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-05-19

4.  Use of overpressure to assess the role of bubbles in focused ultrasound lesion shape in vitro.

Authors:  M R Bailey; L N Couret; O A Sapozhnikov; V A Khokhlova; G ter Haar; S Vaezy; X Shi; R Martin; L A Crum
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.998

5.  Laparoscopic partial kidney ablation with high intensity focused ultrasound.

Authors:  Ryan F Paterson; Eric Barret; Tibério M Siqueira; Thomas A Gardner; Jahangir Tavakkoli; Victor V Rao; Narendra T Sanghvi; Liang Cheng; Arieh L Shalhav
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Ultrasound and microbubbles: their generation, detection and potential utilization in tissue and organ therapy--experimental.

Authors:  F J Fry; N T Sanghvi; R S Foster; R Bihrle; C Hennige
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.998

7.  MRI-guided gas bubble enhanced ultrasound heating in in vivo rabbit thigh.

Authors:  S D Sokka; R King; K Hynynen
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2003-01-21       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Tumor vessel destruction resulting from high-intensity focused ultrasound in patients with solid malignancies.

Authors:  Feng Wu; Wen-Zhi Chen; Jin Bai; Jian-Zhong Zou; Zhi-Long Wang; Hui Zhu; Zhi-Biao Wang
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.998

9.  Effects of high-energy focused ultrasound on kidney tissue in the rat and the dog.

Authors:  J Y Chapelon; J Margonari; Y Theillère; F Gorry; F Vernier; E Blanc; A Gelet
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 20.096

10.  High intensity focused ultrasound for the treatment of rat tumours.

Authors:  G ter Haar; I Rivens; L Chen; S Riddler
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 3.609

View more
  25 in total

Review 1.  High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound: Current Status for Image-Guided Therapy.

Authors:  Alexander Copelan; Jason Hartman; Monzer Chehab; Aradhana M Venkatesan
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.513

2.  Integrated ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging for simultaneous temperature and cavitation monitoring during focused ultrasound therapies.

Authors:  Costas D Arvanitis; Nathan McDannold
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 3.  MR-guided focused ultrasound surgery, present and future.

Authors:  David Schlesinger; Stanley Benedict; Chris Diederich; Wladyslaw Gedroyc; Alexander Klibanov; James Larner
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 4.  Applications of Focused Ultrasound in Cerebrovascular Diseases and Brain Tumors.

Authors:  Francesco Prada; M Yashar S Kalani; Kaan Yagmurlu; Pedro Norat; Massimiliano Del Bene; Francesco DiMeco; Neal F Kassell
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 7.620

5.  Microbubbles improve the ablation efficiency of extracorporeal high intensity focused ultrasound against kidney tissues.

Authors:  Tinghe Yu; Dingrong Hu; Chuanshan Xu
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2008-07-02       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Nonthermal ablation with microbubble-enhanced focused ultrasound close to the optic tract without affecting nerve function.

Authors:  Nathan McDannold; Yong-Zhi Zhang; Chanikarn Power; Ferenc Jolesz; Natalia Vykhodtseva
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2013-09-06       Impact factor: 5.115

Review 7.  State-of-the-art materials for ultrasound-triggered drug delivery.

Authors:  Shashank R Sirsi; Mark A Borden
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2013-12-31       Impact factor: 15.470

8.  Cavitation-enhanced nonthermal ablation in deep brain targets: feasibility in a large animal model.

Authors:  Costas D Arvanitis; Natalia Vykhodtseva; Ferenc Jolesz; Margaret Livingstone; Nathan McDannold
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 5.115

Review 9.  [Ultrasound contrast agents. Pharmaceutical drug safety and bioeffects].

Authors:  M Krix; J W Jenne
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 10.  High-intensity focused ultrasound therapy: an overview for radiologists.

Authors:  Young-sun Kim; Hyunchul Rhim; Min Joo Choi; Hyo Keun Lim; Dongil Choi
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2008 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.500

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.