Literature DB >> 23927187

Phase-shift perfluorocarbon agents enhance high intensity focused ultrasound thermal delivery with reduced near-field heating.

Linsey C Phillips1, Connor Puett, Paul S Sheeran, G Wilson Miller, Terry O Matsunaga, Paul A Dayton.   

Abstract

Ultrasound contrast agents are known to enhance high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) ablation, but these perfluorocarbon microbubbles are limited to the vasculature, have a short half-life in vivo, and may result in unintended heating away from the target site. Herein, a nano-sized (100-300 nm), dual perfluorocarbon (decafluorobutane/dodecafluoropentane) droplet that is stable, is sufficiently small to extravasate, and is convertible to micron-sized bubbles upon acoustic activation was investigated. Microbubbles and nanodroplets were incorporated into tissue-mimicking acrylamide-albumin phantoms. Microbubbles or nanodroplets at 0.1 × 10(6) per cm(3) resulted in mean lesion volumes of 80.4 ± 33.1 mm(3) and 52.8 ± 14.2 mm(3) (mean ± s.e.), respectively, after 20 s of continuous 1 MHz HIFU at a peak negative pressure of 4 MPa, compared to a lesion volume of 1.0 ± 0.8 mm(3) in agent-free control phantoms. Magnetic resonance thermometry mapping during HIFU confirmed undesired surface heating in phantoms containing microbubbles, whereas heating occurred at the acoustic focus of phantoms containing the nanodroplets. Maximal change in temperature at the target site was enhanced by 16.9% and 37.0% by microbubbles and nanodroplets, respectively. This perfluorocarbon nanodroplet has the potential to reduce the time to ablate tumors by one-third during focused ultrasound surgery while also safely enhancing thermal deposition at the target site.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23927187      PMCID: PMC3745500          DOI: 10.1121/1.4812866

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  54 in total

1.  MR monitoring of tumour thermal therapy.

Authors:  D Germain; P Chevallier; A Laurent; H Saint-Jalmes
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.310

2.  Microbubble-enhanced cavitation for noninvasive ultrasound surgery.

Authors:  Binh C Tran; Jongbum Seo; Timothy L Hall; J Brian Fowlkes; Charles A Cain
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.725

3.  Contrast-agent-enhanced ultrasound thermal ablation.

Authors:  Yao-Sheng Tung; Hao-Li Liu; Chih-Ching Wu; Kuen-Cheng Ju; Wen-Shiang Chen; Win-Li Lin
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 2.998

4.  Acoustic droplet vaporization threshold: effects of pulse duration and contrast agent.

Authors:  Andrea H Lo; Oliver D Kripfgans; Paul L Carson; Edward D Rothman; J Brian Fowlkes
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.725

Review 5.  MR-guided focused ultrasound.

Authors:  Wladyslaw M W Gedroyc; Ann Anstee
Journal:  Expert Rev Med Devices       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.166

Review 6.  MR thermometry.

Authors:  Viola Rieke; Kim Butts Pauly
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  Acoustic droplet vaporization for enhancement of thermal ablation by high intensity focused ultrasound.

Authors:  Man Zhang; Mario L Fabiilli; Kevin J Haworth; Frederic Padilla; Scott D Swanson; Oliver D Kripfgans; Paul L Carson; Jeffrey Brian Fowlkes
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2011-06-23       Impact factor: 3.173

8.  Use of a microbubble agent to increase the effects of high intensity focused ultrasound on liver tissue.

Authors:  Yukio Kaneko; Toshiyuki Maruyama; Kenji Takegami; Toshiaki Watanabe; Hiroshi Mitsui; Kazuyuki Hanajiri; Hirokazu Nagawa; Yoichiro Matsumoto
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-03-01       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Effect of anesthesia carrier gas on in vivo circulation times of ultrasound microbubble contrast agents in rats.

Authors:  Lee Mullin; Ryan Gessner; James Kwan; Mehmet Kaya; Mark A Borden; Paul A Dayton
Journal:  Contrast Media Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-01-19       Impact factor: 3.161

10.  Transurethral ultrasound applicators with dynamic multi-sector control for prostate thermal therapy: in vivo evaluation under MR guidance.

Authors:  Adam M Kinsey; Chris J Diederich; Viola Rieke; William H Nau; Kim Butts Pauly; Donna Bouley; Graham Sommer
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 4.071

View more
  26 in total

1.  Phospholipid-Coated Hydrophobic Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles Enhance Thrombectomy by High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound with Low Production of Embolism-Inducing Clot Debris.

Authors:  Nicholas T Blum; Ciara M Gyorkos; Spencer J Narowetz; Evan N Mueller; Andrew P Goodwin
Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 9.229

2.  Acoustic Cavitation-Mediated Delivery of Small Interfering Ribonucleic Acids with Phase-Shift Nano-Emulsions.

Authors:  Mark T Burgess; Tyrone M Porter
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 2.998

3.  High-intensity focused ultrasound sonothrombolysis: the use of perfluorocarbon droplets to achieve clot lysis at reduced acoustic power.

Authors:  Daniel Pajek; Alison Burgess; Yuexi Huang; Kullervo Hynynen
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 2.998

4.  Intracranial Non-thermal Ablation Mediated by Transcranial Focused Ultrasound and Phase-Shift Nanoemulsions.

Authors:  Chenguang Peng; Tao Sun; Natalia Vykhodtseva; Chanikarn Power; Yongzhi Zhang; Nathan Mcdannold; Tyrone Porter
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2019-05-15       Impact factor: 2.998

Review 5.  Optimizing Acoustic Activation of Phase Change Contrast Agents With the Activation Pressure Matching Method: A Review.

Authors:  Juan D Rojas; Paul A Dayton
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 2.725

Review 6.  Ultrasonic technologies in imaging and drug delivery.

Authors:  Yi-Ju Ho; Chih-Chung Huang; Ching-Hsiang Fan; Hao-Li Liu; Chih-Kuang Yeh
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2021-07-23       Impact factor: 9.261

Review 7.  State-of-the-art materials for ultrasound-triggered drug delivery.

Authors:  Shashank R Sirsi; Mark A Borden
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2013-12-31       Impact factor: 15.470

8.  Scavenging dissolved oxygen via acoustic droplet vaporization.

Authors:  Kirthi Radhakrishnan; Christy K Holland; Kevin J Haworth
Journal:  Ultrason Sonochem       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 7.491

9.  Improving the heating efficiency of high intensity focused ultrasound ablation through the use of phase change nanodroplets and multifocus sonication.

Authors:  Aparna Singh; A Gloria Nyankima; M Anthony Phipps; Vandiver Chaplin; Paul A Dayton; Charles Caskey
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2020-10-12       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Targeted drug delivery with focused ultrasound-induced blood-brain barrier opening using acoustically-activated nanodroplets.

Authors:  Cherry C Chen; Paul S Sheeran; Shih-Ying Wu; Oluyemi O Olumolade; Paul A Dayton; Elisa E Konofagou
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 9.776

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.