Literature DB >> 33985825

Microbubble-Enhanced Heating: Exploring the Effect of Microbubble Concentration and Pressure Amplitude on High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Treatments.

Alicia Clark1, Sierra Bonilla1, Dingjie Suo1, Yeruham Shapira2, Michalakis Averkiou3.   

Abstract

High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) is a non-invasive tool that can be used for targeted thermal ablation treatments. Currently, HIFU is clinically approved for treatment of uterine fibroids, various cancers, and certain brain applications. However, for brain applications such as essential tremors, HIFU can only be used to treat limited areas confined to the center of the brain because of geometrical limitations (shape of the transducer and skull). A major obstacle to advancing this technology is the inability to treat non-central brain locations without causing damage to the skin and/or skull. Previous research has indicated that cavitation-induced bubbles or microbubble contrast agents can be used to enhance HIFU treatments by increasing ablation regions and shortening acoustic exposures at lower acoustic pressures. However, little research has been done to explore the interplay between microbubble concentration and pressure amplitude on HIFU treatments. We developed an in vitro experimental setup to study lesion formation at three different acoustic pressures and three microbubble concentrations. Real-time ultrasound imaging was integrated to monitor initial microbubble concentration and subsequent behavior during the HIFU treatments. Depending on the pressure used for the HIFU treatment, there was an optimal concentration of microbubbles that led to enhanced heating in the focal area. If the concentration of microbubbles was too high, the treatment was detrimentally affected because of non-linear attenuation by the pre-focal microbubbles. Additionally, the real-time ultrasound imaging provided a reliable method to monitor microbubble activity during the HIFU treatments, which is important for translation to in vivo HIFU applications with microbubbles.
Copyright © 2021 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acoustic shadowing; Bubble-enhanced heating; High-intensity focused ultrasound; Inertial cavitation; Ultrasound contrast agents

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33985825      PMCID: PMC8243806          DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2021.03.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   3.694


  36 in total

1.  Use of overpressure to assess the role of bubbles in focused ultrasound lesion shape in vitro.

Authors:  M R Bailey; L N Couret; O A Sapozhnikov; V A Khokhlova; G ter Haar; S Vaezy; X Shi; R Martin; L A Crum
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.998

2.  Microbubble-enhanced cavitation for noninvasive ultrasound surgery.

Authors:  Binh C Tran; Jongbum Seo; Timothy L Hall; J Brian Fowlkes; Charles A Cain
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.725

3.  The threshold for thermally significant cavitation in dog's thigh muscle in vivo.

Authors:  K Hynynen
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.998

4.  Contrast-agent-enhanced ultrasound thermal ablation.

Authors:  Yao-Sheng Tung; Hao-Li Liu; Chih-Ching Wu; Kuen-Cheng Ju; Wen-Shiang Chen; Win-Li Lin
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 2.998

5.  Microbubble contrast agent with focused ultrasound to create brain lesions at low power levels: MR imaging and histologic study in rabbits.

Authors:  Nathan J McDannold; Natalia I Vykhodtseva; Kullervo Hynynen
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Temperature measurements during ultrasound hyperthermia.

Authors:  K Hynynen; D K Edwards
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1989 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Ultrasound and microbubble mediated drug delivery: acoustic pressure as determinant for uptake via membrane pores or endocytosis.

Authors:  Ine De Cock; Elisa Zagato; Kevin Braeckmans; Ying Luan; Nico de Jong; Stefaan C De Smedt; Ine Lentacker
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 9.776

8.  A Randomized Trial of Focused Ultrasound Thalamotomy for Essential Tremor.

Authors:  W Jeffrey Elias; Nir Lipsman; William G Ondo; Pejman Ghanouni; Young G Kim; Wonhee Lee; Michael Schwartz; Kullervo Hynynen; Andres M Lozano; Binit B Shah; Diane Huss; Robert F Dallapiazza; Ryder Gwinn; Jennifer Witt; Susie Ro; Howard M Eisenberg; Paul S Fishman; Dheeraj Gandhi; Casey H Halpern; Rosalind Chuang; Kim Butts Pauly; Travis S Tierney; Michael T Hayes; G Rees Cosgrove; Toshio Yamaguchi; Keiichi Abe; Takaomi Taira; Jin W Chang
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Evaluation of the Reproducibility of Bolus Transit Quantification With Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Across Multiple Scanners and Analysis Software Packages-A Quantitative Imaging Biomarker Alliance Study.

Authors:  Michalakis A Averkiou; Eric K Juang; Madison K Gallagher; Maria Alejandra Cuevas; Stephanie R Wilson; Richard G Barr; Paul L Carson
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 6.016

10.  High-intensity focused ultrasound for noninvasive functional neurosurgery.

Authors:  Ernst Martin; Daniel Jeanmonod; Anne Morel; Eyal Zadicario; Beat Werner
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 10.422

View more
  1 in total

1.  Magnetic Nanoparticle-Mediated Heating for Biomedical Applications.

Authors:  Elyahb Allie Kwizera; Samantha Stewart; Md Musavvir Mahmud; Xiaoming He
Journal:  J Heat Transfer       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 2.021

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.