Literature DB >> 18205005

Comparison of continuous vs. pulsed focused ultrasound in treated muscle tissue as evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging, histological analysis, and microarray analysis.

Walter Hundt1, Esther L Yuh, Silke Steinbach, Mark D Bednarski, Samira Guccione.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of different application modes of high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) to muscle tissue. HIFU was applied to muscle tissue of the flank in C3H/Km mice. Two dose regimes were investigated, a continuous HIFU and a short-pulsed HIFU mode. Three hours after HIFU treatment pre- and post-contrast T1-weighted, T2-weighted images and a diffusion-weighted STEAM sequence were obtained. After MR imaging, the animals were euthanized and the treated, and the non-treated tissue was taken out for histology and functional genomic analysis. T2 images showed increased signal intensity and post-contrast T1 showed a decreased contrast uptake in the central parts throughout the tissue of both HIFU modes. A significantly higher diffusion coefficient was found in the muscle tissue treated with continuous wave focused ultrasound. Gene expression analysis revealed profound changes of 54 genes. For most of the analyzed genes higher expression was found after treatment with the short-pulse mode. The highest up-regulated genes encoded for the MHC class III (FC approximately 84), HSP 70 (FC approximately 75) and FBJ osteosarcoma related oncogene (FC approximately 21). Immunohistology and the immunoblot analysis confirmed the presence of HSP70 protein in both applied HIFU modes. The use of HIFU treatment on muscle tissue results in dramatic changes in gene expression; however, the same genes are up-regulated after the application of continuous or pulsed HIFU, indicating that the tissue reaction is independent of the type of tissue damage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18205005     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-007-0848-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  49 in total

1.  IGF-1 Overexpression rescues the failing heart.

Authors:  Allen M Samarel
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2002-04-05       Impact factor: 17.367

2.  Up-regulation of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor Flt-1 after endothelial denudation: role of transcription factor Egr-1.

Authors:  F Vidal; J Aragonés; A Alfranca; M O de Landázuri
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2000-06-01       Impact factor: 22.113

3.  Egr-1, a master switch coordinating upregulation of divergent gene families underlying ischemic stress.

Authors:  S F Yan; T Fujita; J Lu; K Okada; Y Shan Zou; N Mackman; D J Pinsky; D M Stern
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 53.440

4.  A nerve growth factor-induced gene encodes a possible transcriptional regulatory factor.

Authors:  J Milbrandt
Journal:  Science       Date:  1987-11-06       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Heat-shock response is associated with enhanced postischemic ventricular recovery.

Authors:  R W Currie; M Karmazyn; M Kloc; K Mailer
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 17.367

Review 6.  Current status of research on biophysical effects of ultrasound.

Authors:  S B Barnett; G R ter Haar; M C Ziskin; W L Nyborg; K Maeda; J Bang
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.998

7.  Egr-1 is activated in endothelial cells exposed to fluid shear stress and interacts with a novel shear-stress-response element in the PDGF A-chain promoter.

Authors:  L M Khachigian; K R Anderson; N J Halnon; M A Gimbrone; N Resnick; T Collins
Journal:  Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 8.311

8.  Gene transfer of heat-shock protein 70 reduces infarct size in vivo after ischemia/reperfusion in the rabbit heart.

Authors:  S Okubo; O Wildner; M R Shah; J C Chelliah; M L Hess; R C Kukreja
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2001-02-13       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Endothelial nitric oxide synthase overexpression attenuates myocardial reperfusion injury.

Authors:  Steven P Jones; James J M Greer; Aman K Kakkar; P Derek Ware; Richard H Turnage; Michael Hicks; Rien van Haperen; Rini de Crom; Seinosuke Kawashima; Mitsuhiro Yokoyama; David J Lefer
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2003-09-11       Impact factor: 4.733

10.  Breast tumors: comparative accuracy of MR imaging relative to mammography and US for demonstrating extent.

Authors:  C Boetes; R D Mus; R Holland; J O Barentsz; S P Strijk; T Wobbes; J H Hendriks; S H Ruys
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  MRI-guided focused ultrasound surgery in musculoskeletal diseases: the hot topics.

Authors:  Alberto Bazzocchi; Alessandro Napoli; Beatrice Sacconi; Giuseppe Battista; Giuseppe Guglielmi; Carlo Catalano; Ugo Albisinni
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Low-intensity ultrasound-induced cellular destruction and autophagy of nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells.

Authors:  Ping Wang; Albert Wingnang Leung; Chuanshan Xu
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 2.447

3.  Effect of pulsed and continuous therapeutic ultrasound on healthy skeletal muscle in rats.

Authors:  Bélgica Vásquez; Javiera Navarrete; Emilio Farfán; Mario Cantín
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2014-01-15

4.  Ex vivo evaluation of high-intensity focused ultrasound with ultrasonic-induced cavitation bubbles.

Authors:  Nobutaka Abe; Hidekazu Nakamoto; Takashi Suzuki; Yoshihiro Muragaki; Hiroshi Iseki
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2013-06-13       Impact factor: 1.314

5.  Estimation of thermal dose from MR thermometry during application of nonablative pulsed high intensity focused ultrasound.

Authors:  Brian E O'Neill; Christof Karmonik; Elisabetta Sassaroli; King C Li
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  Experimental Data-Mining Analyses Reveal New Roles of Low-Intensity Ultrasound in Differentiating Cell Death Regulatome in Cancer and Non-cancer Cells via Potential Modulation of Chromatin Long-Range Interactions.

Authors:  Jiwei Wang; Bin Lai; Gayani Nanayakkara; Qian Yang; Yu Sun; Yifan Lu; Ying Shao; Daohai Yu; William Y Yang; Ramon Cueto; Hangfei Fu; Huihong Zeng; Wen Shen; Susu Wu; Chunquan Zhang; Yanna Liu; Eric T Choi; Hong Wang; Xiaofeng Yang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2019-07-12       Impact factor: 6.244

7.  Ultrasound May Suppress Tumor Growth, Inhibit Inflammation, and Establish Tolerogenesis by Remodeling Innatome via Pathways of ROS, Immune Checkpoints, Cytokines, and Trained Immunity/Tolerance.

Authors:  Qian Yang; Ruijing Zhang; Peng Tang; Yu Sun; Candice Johnson; Jason Saredy; Susu Wu; Jiwei Wang; Yifan Lu; Fatma Saaoud; Ying Shao; Charles Drummer; Keman Xu; Daohai Yu; Rongshan Li; Shuping Ge; Xiaohua Jiang; Hong Wang; Xiaofeng Yang
Journal:  J Immunol Res       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 4.818

8.  Enhancement of osteogenic differentiation and proliferation in human mesenchymal stem cells by a modified low intensity ultrasound stimulation under simulated microgravity.

Authors:  Sardar M Z Uddin; Yi-Xian Qin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Low-Intensity Ultrasound-Induced Anti-inflammatory Effects Are Mediated by Several New Mechanisms Including Gene Induction, Immunosuppressor Cell Promotion, and Enhancement of Exosome Biogenesis and Docking.

Authors:  Qian Yang; Gayani K Nanayakkara; Charles Drummer; Yu Sun; Candice Johnson; Ramon Cueto; Hangfei Fu; Ying Shao; Luqiao Wang; William Y Yang; Peng Tang; Li-Wen Liu; Shuping Ge; Xiao-Dong Zhou; Mohsin Khan; Hong Wang; Xiaofeng Yang
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 4.566

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.