Literature DB >> 16476673

Fetal nuchal translucency scan and early prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal abnormalities by rapid aneuploidy screening: observational study.

Lyn S Chitty1, Karl O Kagan, Francisca S Molina, Jonathan J Waters, Kypros H Nicolaides.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate an approach for the analysis of samples obtained in screening for trisomy 21 that retains the advantages of quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction (qf-PCR) over full karyotyping and maximises the detection of clinically significant abnormalities.
DESIGN: Observational study.
SETTING: Tertiary referral centre.
SUBJECTS: 17,446 pregnancies, from which chorionic villous samples had been taken after assessment of risk for trisomy 21 by measurement of fetal nuchal translucency (NT) thickness at 11 to 13(+6) weeks of gestation.
INTERVENTIONS: Analysis of chorionic villous samples by full karyotyping and by qf-PCR for chromosomes 13, 18, 21, X, and Y. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Detection of clinically significant chromosomal abnormalities.
RESULTS: The fetal karyotype was normal in 15,548 (89.1%) cases and abnormal in 1898 (10.9%) cases, including 1722 with a likely clinically significant adverse outcome. Karyotyping all cases would lead to the diagnosis of all clinically significant abnormalities, and a policy of relying entirely on qf-PCR would lead to the diagnosis of 97.9% of abnormalities. An alternative strategy whereby qf-PCR is the main method of analysis and full karyotyping is reserved for those cases with a minimum fetal NT thickness of 4 mm would require full karyotyping in 10.1% of the cases, would identify 99.0% of the significant abnormalities, and would cost 60% less than full karyotyping for all.
CONCLUSIONS: In the diagnosis of chromosomal abnormalities after first trimester screening for trisomy 21, a policy of qf-PCR for all samples and karyotyping only if the fetal NT thickness is increased would reduce the economic costs, provide rapid delivery of results, and identify 99% of the clinically significant chromosomal abnormalities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16476673      PMCID: PMC1382537          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.38730.655197.AE

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  10 in total

1.  A large-scale evaluation of amnio-PCR for the rapid prenatal diagnosis of fetal trisomy.

Authors:  L J Levett; S Liddle; R Meredith
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 7.299

2.  Prenatal detection of chromosome disorders by QF-PCR.

Authors:  M Adinolfi; J Sherlock
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2001-09-29       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Development and implementation of a new rapid aneuploidy diagnostic service within the UK National Health Service and implications for the future of prenatal diagnosis.

Authors:  K Mann; S P Fox; S J Abbs; S C Yau; P N Scriven; Z Docherty; C M Ogilvie
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2001-09-29       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  International, collaborative assessment of 146,000 prenatal karyotypes: expected limitations if only chromosome-specific probes and fluorescent in-situ hybridization are used.

Authors:  M I Evans; G P Henry; W A Miller; T H Bui; R J Snidjers; R J Wapner; P Miny; M P Johnson; D Peakman; A Johnson; K Nicolaides; W Holzgreve; S A Ebrahim; R Babu; L Jackson
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 6.918

5.  Evaluation of molecular tests for prenatal diagnosis of chromosome abnormalities.

Authors:  G M Grimshaw; A Szczepura; M Hultén; F MacDonald; N C Nevin; F Sutton; S Dhanjal
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.014

Review 6.  Increased nuchal translucency with normal karyotype.

Authors:  Athena P Souka; Constantin S Von Kaisenberg; Jonathan A Hyett; Jiri D Sonek; Kypros H Nicolaides
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  Rapid and simple prenatal DNA diagnosis of Down's syndrome.

Authors:  L Verma; F Macdonald; P Leedham; M McConachie; S Dhanjal; M Hultén
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-07-04       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Rapid molecular method for prenatal detection of Down's syndrome.

Authors:  B Pertl; S C Yau; J Sherlock; A F Davies; C G Mathew; M Adinolfi
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1994-05-14       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  The effect of fast reporting by amnio-PCR on anxiety levels in women with positive biochemical screening for Down syndrome--a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Wing Cheong Leung; Yung Hang Lam; Ying Wong; Elizabeth T Lau; Mary Hoi Yin Tang
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.050

10.  UK multicentre project on assessment of risk of trisomy 21 by maternal age and fetal nuchal-translucency thickness at 10-14 weeks of gestation. Fetal Medicine Foundation First Trimester Screening Group.

Authors:  R J Snijders; P Noble; N Sebire; A Souka; K H Nicolaides
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-08-01       Impact factor: 79.321

  10 in total
  8 in total

1.  Postnatal economic burden of limited karyotyping.

Authors:  Suneel B Bhat; Sanjay B Bhat; Jessica Stevens
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-03-18

2.  Optimising prenatal diagnosis of Down's syndrome.

Authors:  James P Neilson; Zarko Alfirevic
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-02-25

3.  Rapid aneuploidy detection with multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification: a prospective study of 4000 amniotic fluid samples.

Authors:  Diane Van Opstal; Marjan Boter; Danielle de Jong; Cardi van den Berg; Hennie T Brüggenwirth; Hajo I J Wildschut; Annelies de Klein; Robert-Jan H Galjaard
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2008-09-10       Impact factor: 4.246

4.  Rapid testing versus karyotyping in Down's syndrome screening: cost-effectiveness and detection of clinically significant chromosome abnormalities.

Authors:  Jean Gekas; David-Gradus van den Berg; Audrey Durand; Maud Vallée; Hajo Izaäk Johannes Wildschut; Emmanuel Bujold; Jean-Claude Forest; François Rousseau; Daniel Reinharz
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 5.  Fetal counselling for congenital malformations.

Authors:  Kokila Lakhoo
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2007-03-14       Impact factor: 2.003

6.  Model-based analysis of costs and outcomes of non-invasive prenatal testing for Down's syndrome using cell free fetal DNA in the UK National Health Service.

Authors:  Stephen Morris; Saffron Karlsen; Nancy Chung; Melissa Hill; Lyn S Chitty
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-08       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Limited Clinical Utility of Non-invasive Prenatal Testing for Subchromosomal Abnormalities.

Authors:  Kitty K Lo; Evangelia Karampetsou; Christopher Boustred; Fiona McKay; Sarah Mason; Melissa Hill; Vincent Plagnol; Lyn S Chitty
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification versus karyotyping in prenatal diagnosis: the M.A.K.E. study.

Authors:  Elisabeth M A Boormans; Erwin Birnie; Hajo I Wildschut; Heleen G Schuring-Blom; Dick Oepkes; Carla A C van Oppen; Jan G Nijhuis; Merryn V E Macville; Angelique J A Kooper; Karin Huijsdens; Mariëtte V J Hoffer; Attie Go; Johan Creemers; Shama L Bhola; Katia M Bilardo; Ron Suijkerbuijk; Katelijne Bouman; Robert-Jan H Galjaard; Gouke J Bonsel; Jan Mm van Lith
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2008-05-20       Impact factor: 3.007

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.