OBJECTIVE: To investigate an approach for the analysis of samples obtained in screening for trisomy 21 that retains the advantages of quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction (qf-PCR) over full karyotyping and maximises the detection of clinically significant abnormalities. DESIGN: Observational study. SETTING: Tertiary referral centre. SUBJECTS: 17,446 pregnancies, from which chorionic villous samples had been taken after assessment of risk for trisomy 21 by measurement of fetal nuchal translucency (NT) thickness at 11 to 13(+6) weeks of gestation. INTERVENTIONS: Analysis of chorionic villous samples by full karyotyping and by qf-PCR for chromosomes 13, 18, 21, X, and Y. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Detection of clinically significant chromosomal abnormalities. RESULTS: The fetal karyotype was normal in 15,548 (89.1%) cases and abnormal in 1898 (10.9%) cases, including 1722 with a likely clinically significant adverse outcome. Karyotyping all cases would lead to the diagnosis of all clinically significant abnormalities, and a policy of relying entirely on qf-PCR would lead to the diagnosis of 97.9% of abnormalities. An alternative strategy whereby qf-PCR is the main method of analysis and full karyotyping is reserved for those cases with a minimum fetal NT thickness of 4 mm would require full karyotyping in 10.1% of the cases, would identify 99.0% of the significant abnormalities, and would cost 60% less than full karyotyping for all. CONCLUSIONS: In the diagnosis of chromosomal abnormalities after first trimester screening for trisomy 21, a policy of qf-PCR for all samples and karyotyping only if the fetal NT thickness is increased would reduce the economic costs, provide rapid delivery of results, and identify 99% of the clinically significant chromosomal abnormalities.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate an approach for the analysis of samples obtained in screening for trisomy 21 that retains the advantages of quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction (qf-PCR) over full karyotyping and maximises the detection of clinically significant abnormalities. DESIGN: Observational study. SETTING: Tertiary referral centre. SUBJECTS: 17,446 pregnancies, from which chorionic villous samples had been taken after assessment of risk for trisomy 21 by measurement of fetal nuchal translucency (NT) thickness at 11 to 13(+6) weeks of gestation. INTERVENTIONS: Analysis of chorionic villous samples by full karyotyping and by qf-PCR for chromosomes 13, 18, 21, X, and Y. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Detection of clinically significant chromosomal abnormalities. RESULTS: The fetal karyotype was normal in 15,548 (89.1%) cases and abnormal in 1898 (10.9%) cases, including 1722 with a likely clinically significant adverse outcome. Karyotyping all cases would lead to the diagnosis of all clinically significant abnormalities, and a policy of relying entirely on qf-PCR would lead to the diagnosis of 97.9% of abnormalities. An alternative strategy whereby qf-PCR is the main method of analysis and full karyotyping is reserved for those cases with a minimum fetal NT thickness of 4 mm would require full karyotyping in 10.1% of the cases, would identify 99.0% of the significant abnormalities, and would cost 60% less than full karyotyping for all. CONCLUSIONS: In the diagnosis of chromosomal abnormalities after first trimester screening for trisomy 21, a policy of qf-PCR for all samples and karyotyping only if the fetal NT thickness is increased would reduce the economic costs, provide rapid delivery of results, and identify 99% of the clinically significant chromosomal abnormalities.
Authors: M I Evans; G P Henry; W A Miller; T H Bui; R J Snidjers; R J Wapner; P Miny; M P Johnson; D Peakman; A Johnson; K Nicolaides; W Holzgreve; S A Ebrahim; R Babu; L Jackson Journal: Hum Reprod Date: 1999-05 Impact factor: 6.918
Authors: G M Grimshaw; A Szczepura; M Hultén; F MacDonald; N C Nevin; F Sutton; S Dhanjal Journal: Health Technol Assess Date: 2003 Impact factor: 4.014
Authors: Athena P Souka; Constantin S Von Kaisenberg; Jonathan A Hyett; Jiri D Sonek; Kypros H Nicolaides Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Diane Van Opstal; Marjan Boter; Danielle de Jong; Cardi van den Berg; Hennie T Brüggenwirth; Hajo I J Wildschut; Annelies de Klein; Robert-Jan H Galjaard Journal: Eur J Hum Genet Date: 2008-09-10 Impact factor: 4.246
Authors: Kitty K Lo; Evangelia Karampetsou; Christopher Boustred; Fiona McKay; Sarah Mason; Melissa Hill; Vincent Plagnol; Lyn S Chitty Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2015-12-17 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: Elisabeth M A Boormans; Erwin Birnie; Hajo I Wildschut; Heleen G Schuring-Blom; Dick Oepkes; Carla A C van Oppen; Jan G Nijhuis; Merryn V E Macville; Angelique J A Kooper; Karin Huijsdens; Mariëtte V J Hoffer; Attie Go; Johan Creemers; Shama L Bhola; Katia M Bilardo; Ron Suijkerbuijk; Katelijne Bouman; Robert-Jan H Galjaard; Gouke J Bonsel; Jan Mm van Lith Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Date: 2008-05-20 Impact factor: 3.007