Literature DB >> 10325263

International, collaborative assessment of 146,000 prenatal karyotypes: expected limitations if only chromosome-specific probes and fluorescent in-situ hybridization are used.

M I Evans1, G P Henry, W A Miller, T H Bui, R J Snidjers, R J Wapner, P Miny, M P Johnson, D Peakman, A Johnson, K Nicolaides, W Holzgreve, S A Ebrahim, R Babu, L Jackson.   

Abstract

The development of chromosome-specific probes (CSP) and fluorescent in-situ hybridization (FISH) has allowed for very rapid identification of selected numerical abnormalities. We attempt here to determine, in principle, what percentage of abnormalities would be detectable if only CSP-FISH were performed without karyotype for prenatal diagnosis. A total of 146 128 consecutive karyotypes for prenatal diagnosis from eight centres in four countries for 5 years were compared with predicted detection if probes for chromosomes 13, 18, 21, X and Y were used, and assuming 100% detection efficiency. A total of 4163 abnormalities (2.85%) were found including 2889 (69. 4%) (trisomy 21, trisomy 18, trisomy 13, numerical sex chromosome abnormalities, and triploidies) which were considered detectable by FISH. Of these, 1274 were mosaics, translocations, deletions, inversions, rings, and markers which would not be considered detectable. CSP-FISH is a useful adjunct to karyotype for high risk situations, and may be appropriate in low risk screening, but should not be seen as a replacement for karyotype as too many structural chromosome abnormalities will be missed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10325263     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/14.5.1213

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  7 in total

1.  Prenatal detection of aneuploidies using fluorescence in situ hybridization: a preliminary experience in an Indian set up.

Authors:  Vaideji Jobanputra; Kalol Kumar Roy; Kiran Kucheria
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 1.826

2.  Fetal nuchal translucency scan and early prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal abnormalities by rapid aneuploidy screening: observational study.

Authors:  Lyn S Chitty; Karl O Kagan; Francisca S Molina; Jonathan J Waters; Kypros H Nicolaides
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-02-13

3.  Prenatal Invasive Testing at a Tertiary Referral Center in India: A Report of 433 Cases Under a Single Operator.

Authors:  Vandana Bansal; Rujul Jhaveri
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2021-06-08

4.  Prenatal diagnosis of fetal aneuploidies: post-genomic developments.

Authors:  Sinuhe Hahn; Laird G Jackson; Bernhard G Zimmermann
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 11.117

5.  Rapid testing versus karyotyping in Down's syndrome screening: cost-effectiveness and detection of clinically significant chromosome abnormalities.

Authors:  Jean Gekas; David-Gradus van den Berg; Audrey Durand; Maud Vallée; Hajo Izaäk Johannes Wildschut; Emmanuel Bujold; Jean-Claude Forest; François Rousseau; Daniel Reinharz
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 4.246

6.  Metaphase FISH on a chip: miniaturized microfluidic device for fluorescence in situ hybridization.

Authors:  Indumathi Vedarethinam; Pranjul Shah; Maria Dimaki; Zeynep Tumer; Niels Tommerup; Winnie E Svendsen
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2010-11-02       Impact factor: 3.576

7.  Rapid-prenatal diagnosis through fluorescence in situ hybridization for preventing aneuploidy related birth defects.

Authors:  Ashish Fauzdar; Mohit Chowdhry; R N Makroo; Manoj Mishra; Priyanka Srivastava; Richa Tyagi; Preeti Bhadauria; Anita Kaul
Journal:  Indian J Hum Genet       Date:  2013-01
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.