Literature DB >> 18781187

Rapid aneuploidy detection with multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification: a prospective study of 4000 amniotic fluid samples.

Diane Van Opstal1, Marjan Boter, Danielle de Jong, Cardi van den Berg, Hennie T Brüggenwirth, Hajo I J Wildschut, Annelies de Klein, Robert-Jan H Galjaard.   

Abstract

The introduction of prenatal screening requires rapid high-throughput diagnosis of common aneuploidies. Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) allows for quick, easily automated multiplex testing of these aneuploidies in one polymerase chain reaction. We performed a large prospective study using MLPA on 4000 amniotic fluid (AF) samples including all indications and compared its value to karyotyping and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). MLPA can reliably determine common aneuploidies with 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity. Moreover, some mosaic cases and structural chromosome aberrations were detected as well. In cases of a male fetus, triploidies can be detected by an aberrant pattern of probe signals, which mimics maternal cell contamination (MCC). Macroscopic blood contamination was encountered in 3.2% of the AF samples. In 20% of these samples, an MLPA pattern was found consistent with MCC, although there were no false negatives of the most common aneuploidies. As the vast majority of inconclusive results (1.7%) is due to potential MCC, we designed a protocol in which we determine whether MLPA can be performed on blood-contaminated AF samples by testing if blood is of fetal origin. Then, the number of inconclusive results could be theoretically reduced to 0.05%. We propose an alternative interpretation of relative probe signals for rapid aneuploidy diagnosis (RAD). We discuss the value of MLPA for the detection of (submicroscopic) structural chromosome anomalies. MLPA is a reliable method that can replace FISH and could be used as a stand-alone test for RAD instead of karyotyping.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18781187      PMCID: PMC2985961          DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2008.161

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet        ISSN: 1018-4813            Impact factor:   4.246


  28 in total

1.  Follow-up investigations in uncultured amniotic fluid cells after uncertain cytogenetic results.

Authors:  D Van Opstal; C van den Berg; R J Galjaard; F J Los
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.050

2.  Rapid prenatal diagnosis of trisomy 21 in 5049 consecutive uncultured amniotic fluid samples by fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH).

Authors:  Ingrid Witters; K Devriendt; E Legius; G Matthijs; D Van Schoubroeck; F A Van Assche; Jean-Pierre Fryns
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.050

3.  Development and targeted application of a rapid QF-PCR test for sex chromosome imbalance.

Authors:  Celia Donaghue; Angharad Roberts; Kathy Mann; Caroline Mackie Ogilvie
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.050

4.  Relative quantification of 40 nucleic acid sequences by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification.

Authors:  Jan P Schouten; Cathal J McElgunn; Raymond Waaijer; Danny Zwijnenburg; Filip Diepvens; Gerard Pals
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2002-06-15       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  Evaluation of molecular tests for prenatal diagnosis of chromosome abnormalities.

Authors:  G M Grimshaw; A Szczepura; M Hultén; F MacDonald; N C Nevin; F Sutton; S Dhanjal
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.014

6.  Prenatal detection of Down's syndrome by rapid aneuploidy testing for chromosomes 13, 18, and 21 by FISH or PCR without a full karyotype: a cytogenetic risk assessment.

Authors:  Allan Caine; A Edna Maltby; C Anthony Parkin; Jonathan J Waters; John A Crolla
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 Jul 9-15       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Fetal nuchal translucency scan and early prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal abnormalities by rapid aneuploidy screening: observational study.

Authors:  Lyn S Chitty; Karl O Kagan; Francisca S Molina; Jonathan J Waters; Kypros H Nicolaides
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-02-13

Review 8.  Prenatal cytogenetic diagnosis: gone FISHing, BAC soon!

Authors:  T-H Bui
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 7.299

9.  Prenatal diagnosis and normal outcome of a 46,XX/46,XY chimera: a case report.

Authors:  Valérie Malan; R Gesny; N Morichon-Delvallez; M C Aubry; A Benachi; D Sanlaville; C Turleau; J P Bonnefont; C Fekete-Nihoul; M Vekemans
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2007-02-01       Impact factor: 6.918

10.  Contribution of ultrasonographic examination to the prenatal detection of chromosomal abnormalities in 19 centres across Europe.

Authors:  C De Vigan; N Baena; E Cariati; M Clementi; C Stoll
Journal:  Ann Genet       Date:  2001 Oct-Dec
View more
  16 in total

1.  Assessment of QF-PCR as the first approach in prenatal diagnosis.

Authors:  Celia Badenas; Laia Rodríguez-Revenga; Carme Morales; Carmen Mediano; Alberto Plaja; Ma Mar Pérez-Iribarne; Anna Soler; Núria Clusellas; Antoni Borrell; Ma Ángeles Sánchez; Elisabeth Miró; Aurora Sánchez; Montserrat Milà; Wladimiro Jiménez
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2010-10-01       Impact factor: 5.568

2.  Multiplex ligation dependent probe amplification (MLPA) for rapid distinction between unique sequence positive and negative marker chromosomes in prenatal diagnosis.

Authors:  Diane Van Opstal; Marjan Boter; Petra Noomen; Malgorzata Srebniak; Guus Hamers; Robert-Jan H Galjaard
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 2.009

Review 3.  Medical Genetics for Practicing Obstetrician.

Authors:  K N Sreelakshmi
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2019-08-28

4.  Structural and numerical changes of chromosome X in patients with esophageal atresia.

Authors:  Erwin Brosens; Elisabeth M de Jong; Tahsin Stefan Barakat; Bert H Eussen; Barbara D'haene; Elfride De Baere; Hannah Verdin; Pino J Poddighe; Robert-Jan Galjaard; Joost Gribnau; Alice S Brooks; Dick Tibboel; Annelies de Klein
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 4.246

5.  SNaPshot Assay in Quantitative Detection of Allelic Nondisjunction in Down Syndrome.

Authors:  Debarati Ghosh; Sailesh Gochhait; Disha Banerjee; Anindita Chatterjee; Swagata Sinha; Krishnadas Nandagopal
Journal:  Genet Test Mol Biomarkers       Date:  2012-08-29

6.  BACs-on-Beads™ assay, a rapid aneuploidy test, improves the diagnostic yield of conventional karyotyping.

Authors:  Chantal Farra; Anwar H Nassar; Fadi Mirza; Lina Abdouni; Mirna Souaid; Johnny Awwad
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2019-10-08       Impact factor: 2.316

7.  Application of a target array comparative genomic hybridization to prenatal diagnosis.

Authors:  Ji Hyeon Park; Jung Hoon Woo; Sung Han Shim; Song-Ju Yang; Young Min Choi; Kap-Seok Yang; Dong Hyun Cha
Journal:  BMC Med Genet       Date:  2010-06-24       Impact factor: 2.103

8.  Rapid screening for chromosomal aneuploidies using array-MLPA.

Authors:  Jing-Bin Yan; Miao Xu; Can Xiong; Da-Wen Zhou; Zhao-Rui Ren; Ying Huang; Monique Mommersteeg; Rinie van Beuningen; Ying-Tai Wang; Shi-Xiu Liao; Fanyi Zeng; Ying Wu; Yi-Tao Zeng
Journal:  BMC Med Genet       Date:  2011-05-17       Impact factor: 2.103

9.  Comparable low-level mosaicism in affected and non affected tissue of a complex CDH patient.

Authors:  Danielle Veenma; Niels Beurskens; Hannie Douben; Bert Eussen; Petra Noomen; Lutgarde Govaerts; Els Grijseels; Maarten Lequin; Ronald de Krijger; Dick Tibboel; Annelies de Klein; Dian Van Opstal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-12-21       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Is routine karyotyping required in prenatal samples with a molecular or metabolic referral?

Authors:  Angelique Ja Kooper; Jacqueline Jpm Pieters; Brigitte Hw Faas; Lies H Hoefsloot; Ineke van der Burgt; Hans A Zondervan; Arie Pt Smits
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2012-01-27       Impact factor: 2.009

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.