Literature DB >> 9717920

UK multicentre project on assessment of risk of trisomy 21 by maternal age and fetal nuchal-translucency thickness at 10-14 weeks of gestation. Fetal Medicine Foundation First Trimester Screening Group.

R J Snijders1, P Noble, N Sebire, A Souka, K H Nicolaides.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Prenatal diagnosis of trisomy 21 currently relies on assessment of risk followed by invasive testing in the 5% of pregnancies at the highest estimated risk. Selection of the high-risk group by a combination of maternal age and second-trimester maternal serum biochemistry gives a detection rate of about 60%. We investigated assessment of risk by a combination of maternal age and fetal nuchal-translucency thickness, measured by ultrasonography at 10-14 weeks of gestation.
METHODS: The risk of trisomy 21 was estimated for 96127 women of median age 31 years (range 14-49) with singleton pregnancies. Ultrasonography was done by 306 appropriately trained sonographers in 22 centres. Risk of trisomy 21 was calculated from the maternal age and gestational-age-related prevalence, multiplied by a likelihood ratio depending on the deviation from normal in nuchal-translucency thickness for crown-rump length. The distribution of risks was investigated and the sensitivity of a cut-off risk of 1 in 300 was calculated. Phenotype was assessed by fetal karyotyping or clinical examination of liveborn infants.
FINDINGS: The estimated trisomy-21 risk, from maternal age and fetal nuchal-translucency thickness, was 1 in 300 or higher in 7907 (8.3%) of 95476 normal pregnancies, 268 (82-2%) of 326 with trisomy 21, and 253 (77.9%) of 325 with other chromosomal defects. The 5% of the study population with the highest estimated risk included 77% of trisomy-21 cases.
INTERPRETATION: Selection of the high-risk group for invasive testing by this method allows the detection of about 80% of affected pregnancies. However, even this method of risk assessment requires about 30 invasive tests for identification of one affected fetus.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Genetics and Reproduction

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9717920     DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(97)11280-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  88 in total

1.  Screening for Down's syndrome: effects, safety, and cost effectiveness of first and second trimester strategies.

Authors:  R E Gilbert; C Augood; R Gupta; A E Ades; S Logan; M Sculpher; J H van Der Meulen
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-08-25

2.  Screening for Down's syndrome. Biochemical screening offers advantages.

Authors:  P A Boyd; M Jefferies; P F Chamberlain; A J Crocker
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-09-23

Review 3.  Indications for fetal echocardiography.

Authors:  M Small; J A Copel
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.655

4.  Antenatal screening for Down's syndrome.

Authors:  Zarko Alfirevic; James P Neilson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-10-09

5.  Fetal cardiac function during the first trimester of pregnancy.

Authors:  Oriana Valenti; Fosca A F Di Prima; Eliana Renda; Marianna Faraci; Entela Hyseni; Roberta De Domenico; Santo Monte; Elsa Giorgio
Journal:  J Prenat Med       Date:  2011-07

6.  Retrospective study evaluating the performance of a first-trimester combined screening for trisomy 21 in an Italian unselected population.

Authors:  Francesco Padula; Pietro Cignini; Diana Giannarelli; Cristiana Brizzi; Claudio Coco; Laura D'Emidio; Elsa Giorgio; Maurizio Giorlandino; Lucia Mangiafico; Marialuisa Mastrandrea; Vincenzo Milite; Luisa Mobili; Cinzia Nanni; Raffaella Raffio; Cinzia Taramanni; Roberto Vigna; Alvaro Mesoraca; Domenico Bizzoco; Ivan Gabrielli; Gianluca Di Giacomo; Maria Antonietta Barone; Antonella Cima; Francesca Romana Giorlandino; Sabrina Emili; Marina Cupellaro; Claudio Giorlandino
Journal:  J Prenat Med       Date:  2014 Apr-Jun

7.  Pregnancy Outcome of Abnormal Nuchal Translucency: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Nasibeh Roozbeh; Maryam Azizi; Leili Darvish
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-03-01

8.  Improving the effectiveness of routine prenatal screening for major congenital heart defects.

Authors:  J S Carvalho; E Mavrides; E A Shinebourne; S Campbell; B Thilaganathan
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 5.994

9.  Prenatal diagnosis for paediatricians.

Authors:  Anne Summers
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.253

10.  Clinical impact of first and early second trimester fetal echocardiography on high risk pregnancies.

Authors:  J S Carvalho; G Moscoso; A Tekay; S Campbell; B Thilaganathan; E A Shinebourne
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.994

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.