Literature DB >> 26708752

Limited Clinical Utility of Non-invasive Prenatal Testing for Subchromosomal Abnormalities.

Kitty K Lo1, Evangelia Karampetsou2, Christopher Boustred2, Fiona McKay2, Sarah Mason2, Melissa Hill2, Vincent Plagnol1, Lyn S Chitty3.   

Abstract

The use of massively parallel sequencing of maternal cfDNA for non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) of aneuploidy is widely available. Recently, the scope of testing has increased to include selected subchromosomal abnormalities, but the number of samples reported has been small. We developed a calling pipeline based on a segmentation algorithm for the detection of these rearrangements in maternal plasma. The same read depth used in our standard pipeline for aneuploidy NIPT detected 15/18 (83%) samples with pathogenic rearrangements > 6 Mb but only 2/10 samples with rearrangements < 6 Mb, unless they were maternally inherited. There were two false-positive calls in 534 samples with no known subchromosomal abnormalities (specificity 99.6%). Using higher read depths, we detected 29/31 fetal subchromosomal abnormalities, including the three samples with maternally inherited microduplications. We conclude that test sensitivity is a function of the fetal fraction, read depth, and size of the fetal CNV and that at least one of the two false negatives is due to a low fetal fraction. The lack of an independent method for determining fetal fraction, especially for female fetuses, leads to uncertainty in test sensitivity, which currently has implications for this technique's future as a clinical diagnostic test. Furthermore, to be effective, NIPT must be able to detect chromosomal rearrangements across the whole genome for a very low false-positive rate. Because standard NIPT can only detect the majority of larger (>6 Mb) chromosomal rearrangements and requires knowledge of fetal fraction, we consider that it is not yet ready for routine clinical implementation.
Copyright © 2016 The American Society of Human Genetics. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26708752      PMCID: PMC4716686          DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2015.11.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hum Genet        ISSN: 0002-9297            Impact factor:   11.025


  25 in total

1.  Noninvasive prenatal diagnosis of a fetal microdeletion syndrome.

Authors:  David Peters; Tianjiao Chu; Svetlana A Yatsenko; Nancy Hendrix; W Allen Hogge; Urvashi Surti; Kimberly Bunce; Mary Dunkel; Patricia Shaw; Aleksandar Rajkovic
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Fetal nuchal translucency scan and early prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal abnormalities by rapid aneuploidy screening: observational study.

Authors:  Lyn S Chitty; Karl O Kagan; Francisca S Molina; Jonathan J Waters; Kypros H Nicolaides
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-02-13

3.  Non-invasive prenatal diagnosis for fetal sex determination: benefits and disadvantages from the service users' perspective.

Authors:  Celine Lewis; Melissa Hill; Heather Skirton; Lyn S Chitty
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 4.246

4.  Global perspectives on clinical adoption of NIPT.

Authors:  Mollie A Minear; Celine Lewis; Subarna Pradhan; Subhashini Chandrasekharan
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 3.050

5.  Sensitivity of noninvasive prenatal detection of fetal aneuploidy from maternal plasma using shotgun sequencing is limited only by counting statistics.

Authors:  H Christina Fan; Stephen R Quake
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-05-03       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Noninvasive detection of fetal subchromosome abnormalities via deep sequencing of maternal plasma.

Authors:  Anupama Srinivasan; Diana W Bianchi; Hui Huang; Amy J Sehnert; Richard P Rava
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2013-01-10       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 7.  The identification of microdeletion syndromes and other chromosome abnormalities: cytogenetic methods of the past, new technologies for the future.

Authors:  Lisa G Shaffer; Bassem A Bejjani; Beth Torchia; Susan Kirkpatrick; Justine Coppinger; Blake C Ballif
Journal:  Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet       Date:  2007-11-15       Impact factor: 3.908

8.  Detection of microdeletion 22q11.2 in a fetus by next-generation sequencing of maternal plasma.

Authors:  Taylor J Jensen; Zeljko Dzakula; Cosmin Deciu; Dirk van den Boom; Mathias Ehrich
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2012-05-04       Impact factor: 8.327

9.  Copy number variation detection and genotyping from exome sequence data.

Authors:  Niklas Krumm; Peter H Sudmant; Arthur Ko; Brian J O'Roak; Maika Malig; Bradley P Coe; Aaron R Quinlan; Deborah A Nickerson; Evan E Eichler
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2012-05-14       Impact factor: 9.043

10.  Detection rates of clinically significant genomic alterations by microarray analysis for specific anomalies detected by ultrasound.

Authors:  Lisa G Shaffer; Jill A Rosenfeld; Mindy P Dabell; Justine Coppinger; Anne M Bandholz; Jay W Ellison; J Britt Ravnan; Beth S Torchia; Blake C Ballif; Allan J Fisher
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 3.050

View more
  28 in total

1.  [Noninvasive prenatal genetic testing in 6804 pregnant women aged less than 35 years with positive results in serum screening].

Authors:  Xingkun Yang; Xiaoling Guo; Jin Zhong; Zhihua Chen; Shuijuan Wu
Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao       Date:  2019-11-30

Review 2.  Prenatal and pre-implantation genetic diagnosis.

Authors:  Joris Robert Vermeesch; Thierry Voet; Koenraad Devriendt
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 53.242

3.  Experimental factors are associated with fetal fraction in size selection noninvasive prenatal testing.

Authors:  Longwei Qiao; Jun Mao; Minjuan Liu; Yinghua Liu; Xiaoyan Song; Hui Tang; Qing Zhang; Hong Li; Yaojuan Lu; Yuting Liang; Ting Wang
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 4.060

4.  Toward an Ethically Sensitive Implementation of Noninvasive Prenatal Screening in the Global Context.

Authors:  Jessica Mozersky; Vardit Ravitsky; Rayna Rapp; Marsha Michie; Subhashini Chandrasekharan; Megan Allyse
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 2.683

5.  Evaluation of preferences of women and healthcare professionals in Singapore for implementation of noninvasive prenatal testing for Down syndrome.

Authors:  Angela Natalie Barrett; Henna Vishal Advani; Lyn S Chitty; Lin Lin Su; Arijit Biswas; Wei Ching Tan; Melissa Hill; Mahesh Choolani
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 1.858

6.  Performance Evaluation of NIPT in Detection of Chromosomal Copy Number Variants Using Low-Coverage Whole-Genome Sequencing of Plasma DNA.

Authors:  Hongtai Liu; Ya Gao; Zhiyang Hu; Linhua Lin; Xuyang Yin; Jun Wang; Dayang Chen; Fang Chen; Hui Jiang; Jinghui Ren; Wei Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Implementation of non-invasive prenatal testing by semiconductor sequencing in a genetic laboratory.

Authors:  Annelies Dheedene; Tom Sante; Matthias De Smet; Jean-François Vanbellinghen; Bernard Grisart; Sarah Vergult; Sandra Janssens; Björn Menten
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 3.050

8.  Targeted capture enrichment assay for non-invasive prenatal testing of large and small size sub-chromosomal deletions and duplications.

Authors:  Maria C Neofytou; Kyriakos Tsangaras; Elena Kypri; Charalambos Loizides; Marios Ioannides; Achilleas Achilleos; Petros Mina; Anna Keravnou; Carolina Sismani; George Koumbaris; Philippos C Patsalis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Evidence for feasibility of fetal trophoblastic cell-based noninvasive prenatal testing.

Authors:  Amy M Breman; Jennifer C Chow; Lance U'Ren; Elizabeth A Normand; Sadeem Qdaisat; Li Zhao; David M Henke; Rui Chen; Chad A Shaw; Laird Jackson; Yaping Yang; Liesbeth Vossaert; Rachel H V Needham; Elizabeth J Chang; Daniel Campton; Jeffrey L Werbin; Ron C Seubert; Ignatia B Van den Veyver; Jackie L Stilwell; Eric P Kaldjian; Arthur L Beaudet
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2016-10-02       Impact factor: 3.050

10.  Performances of NIPT for copy number variations at different sequencing depths using the semiconductor sequencing platform.

Authors:  Jiexia Yang; Jing Wu; Haishan Peng; Yaping Hou; Fangfang Guo; Dongmei Wang; Haoxin Ouyang; Yixia Wang; Aihua Yin
Journal:  Hum Genomics       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 4.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.