Literature DB >> 16464710

Should PET replace SPECT for evaluating CAD? The end of the beginning.

Marcelo F Di Carli, Rory Hachamovitch.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2006        PMID： 16464710     DOI： 10.1016/j.nuclcard.2005.12.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol        ISSN： 1071-3581            Impact factor:   5.952


× No keyword cloud information.
  21 in total

Review 1.  Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors.

Authors:  F E Harrell; K L Lee; D B Mark
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1996-02-28       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 2.  Estimating causal effects from large data sets using propensity scores.

Authors:  D B Rubin
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1997-10-15       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  Modeling and variable selection in epidemiologic analysis.

Authors:  S Greenland
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Attenuation correction and gating synergistically improve the diagnostic accuracy of myocardial perfusion SPECT.

Authors:  Jonathan M Links; E Gordon DePuey; Raymond Taillefer; Lewis C Becker
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2002 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.952

5.  Reduction of coronary flow reserve in areas with and without ischemia on stress perfusion imaging in patients with coronary artery disease: a study using oxygen 15-labeled water PET.

Authors:  Keiichiro Yoshinaga; Chietsugu Katoh; Kazuyuki Noriyasu; Yasuyoshi Iwado; Hideto Furuyama; Yoshinori Ito; Yuji Kuge; Tetsuro Kohya; Akira Kitabatake; Nagara Tamaki
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.952

6.  Application of information theory to clinical diagnostic testing. The electrocardiographic stress test.

Authors:  G A Diamond; M Hirsch; J S Forrester; H M Staniloff; R Vas; S W Halpern; H J Swan
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1981-04       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Stress myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography is clinically effective and cost effective in risk stratification of patients with a high likelihood of coronary artery disease (CAD) but no known CAD.

Authors:  Rory Hachamovitch; Sean W Hayes; John D Friedman; Ishac Cohen; Daniel S Berman
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2004-01-21       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  Reduced coronary vasodilator function in infarcted and normal myocardium after myocardial infarction.

Authors:  N G Uren; T Crake; D C Lefroy; R de Silva; G J Davies; A Maseri
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1994-07-28       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Diagnostic accuracy of rest/stress ECG-gated Rb-82 myocardial perfusion PET: comparison with ECG-gated Tc-99m sestamibi SPECT.

Authors:  Timothy M Bateman; Gary V Heller; A Iain McGhie; John D Friedman; James A Case; Jan R Bryngelson; Ginger K Hertenstein; Kelly L Moutray; Kimberly Reid; S James Cullom
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2006 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.952

10.  A study of the liver-heart artifact in emission tomography.

Authors:  J Nuyts; P Dupont; V Van den Maegdenbergh; S Vleugels; P Suetens; L Mortelmans
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 10.057
View more
  18 in total

1.  Diagnosis and prognosis of coronary artery disease: PET is superior to SPECT: Pro.

Authors:  Rob S B Beanlands; George Youssef
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 2.  Left main coronary artery disease: A review of the spectrum of noninvasive diagnostic modalities.

Authors:  Nishtha Sareen; Karthik Ananthasubramaniam
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 3.  Nuclear imaging in cardiac cell therapy.

Authors:  Frank M Bengel
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 4.214

4.  Comparing rubidium 82 myocardial perfusion positron emission tomography and SPECT.

Authors:  Pierre Weinmann
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 5.952

5.  Will the new advantages provided by PET in myocardial perfusion imaging help nuclear cardiology survive the test of time against conventional radiological techniques?

Authors:  Federico Caobelli; Davide Farina; Claudio Pizzocaro; Ugo Paolo Guerra
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 6.  The evolving role of molecular imaging for coronary artery disease: where do we stand today?

Authors:  T Chua
Journal:  Heart Asia       Date:  2009-01-01

7.  SPECT but not PET remains as the working horse of the state of the art nuclear cardiac imaging laboratory: Con.

Authors:  Antti Saraste; Juhani Knuuti
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2017-07-31       Impact factor: 5.952

8.  Diagnostic accuracy of myocardial perfusion imaging with single photon emission computed tomography and positron emission tomography: a comparison with coronary angiography.

Authors:  Lars Husmann; Mischa Wiegand; Ines Valenta; Oliver Gaemperli; Tiziano Schepis; Patrick T Siegrist; Mehdi Namdar; Christophe A Wyss; Hatem Alkadhi; Philipp A Kaufmann
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2007-12-25       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 9.  Role of Cardiac PET in Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Brian M Salata; Parmanand Singh
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2017-11-09

10.  Optimization of Rb-82 PET acquisition and reconstruction protocols for myocardial perfusion defect detection.

Authors:  Jing Tang; Arman Rahmim; Riikka Lautamäki; Martin A Lodge; Frank M Bengel; Benjamin M W Tsui
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2009-05-06       Impact factor: 3.609
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.