Literature DB >> 7471347

Application of information theory to clinical diagnostic testing. The electrocardiographic stress test.

G A Diamond, M Hirsch, J S Forrester, H M Staniloff, R Vas, S W Halpern, H J Swan.   

Abstract

The inherent imperfection of clinical diagnostic tests introduces uncertainty into their interpretation. The magnitude of diagnostic uncertainty after any test may be quantified by information theory. THe information content of the electrocardiographic ST-segment response to exercise, relative to the diagnosis of angiographic coronary artery disease, was determined using literature-based pooled estimates of the true- and false-positive rates for various magnitudes of ST depression from less than 0.5 mm to greater than or equal to 2.5 mm. This analysis allows three conclusions of clinical relevance. First, the diagnostic information content of exercise-induced ST-segment depression, interpreted by the standard 1.0-mm criterion, averages only 15% of that of coronary angiography. Second, there is a 41% increase in information content when the specific magnitude of ST-segment depression is analyzed, as opposed to the single, categorical 1-mm criterion. Third, the information obtained from ECG stress testing is markedly influenced by the prevalence of disease in the population tested, being low in the asymptomatic and typical angina groups and substantially greater in groups with nonanginal chest pain and atypical angina. The quantitation of information has broad relevance to selection and use of diagnostic tests, because one can analyze objectively the value of different interpretation criteria, compare one test with another and evaluate the cost-effectiveness of both a single test and potential testing combination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7471347     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.63.4.915

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  11 in total

1.  Should PET replace SPECT for evaluating CAD? The end of the beginning.

Authors:  Marcelo F Di Carli; Rory Hachamovitch
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2006 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Automated selection of clinical data to support radiographic interpretation.

Authors:  P Haug; D Beesley
Journal:  Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care       Date:  1991

Review 3.  Confidence in diagnostic testing.

Authors:  P S Heckerling
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1988 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Noninvasive diagnosis of renal allograft rejections--application of an information-theoretical model.

Authors:  H Heiss; W Wild; R Margreiter; W Pfaller; P Kotanko
Journal:  Klin Wochenschr       Date:  1988-01-04

5.  ASNC imaging guidelines for nuclear cardiology procedures : Standardized reporting of nuclear cardiology procedures.

Authors:  Peter L Tilkemeier; Jamieson Bourque; Rami Doukky; Rupa Sanghani; Richard L Weinberg
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 5.952

6.  Compartmental multivariate analysis of exercise ECGs for accurate detection of myocardial ischaemia.

Authors:  H Sievänen; L Karhumäki; I Vuori; J Malmivuo
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 2.602

7.  Cold pressor test in diagnosis of coronary artery disease: echophonocardiographic method.

Authors:  B I Seneviratne; I Linton; R Wilkinson; W Rowe; M Spice
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1983-06-18

8.  Using information theory to optimize a diagnostic threshold to match physician-ordering practice.

Authors:  Mark A Zaydman; Jonathan R Brestoff; Ronald Jackups
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 6.317

9.  Optimum binary cut-off threshold of a diagnostic test: comparison of different methods using Monte Carlo technique.

Authors:  Gilbert Reibnegger; Walter Schrabmair
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 2.796

Review 10.  A Review of the Application of Information Theory to Clinical Diagnostic Testing.

Authors:  William A Benish
Journal:  Entropy (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 2.524

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.