Warning: Undefined array key "mm" in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Will the new advantages provided by PET in myocardial perfusion imaging help nuclear cardiology survive the test of time against conventional radiological techniques?

× No keyword cloud information.

10 in total

1. ⁸²Rb PET myocardial perfusion imaging is superior to ⁹⁹mTc-labelled agent SPECT in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease.

Authors: Albert Flotats; Paco E Bravo; Kenji Fukushima; Muhammad A Chaudhry; Jennifer Merrill; Frank M Bengel
Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2012-05-31 Impact factor: 9.236

Review 2. Roles of nuclear cardiology, cardiac computed tomography, and cardiac magnetic resonance: assessment of patients with suspected coronary artery disease.

Authors: Daniel S Berman; Rory Hachamovitch; Leslee J Shaw; John D Friedman; Sean W Hayes; Louise E J Thomson; David S Fieno; Guido Germano; Piotr Slomka; Nathan D Wong; Xingping Kang; Alan Rozanski
Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2006-01 Impact factor: 10.057

3. Should PET replace SPECT for evaluating CAD? The end of the beginning.

Authors: Marcelo F Di Carli; Rory Hachamovitch
Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2006 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 5.952

Review 4. Stress cardiac magnetic resonance.

Authors: Faisal Nabi; Adham Malaty; Dipan J Shah
Journal: Curr Opin Cardiol Date: 2011-09 Impact factor: 2.161

Review 5. Cardiac dedicated ultrafast SPECT cameras: new designs and clinical implications.

Authors: Ernest V Garcia; Tracy L Faber; Fabio P Esteves
Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2011-01-13 Impact factor: 10.057

6. Hybrid cardiac imaging: SPECT/CT and PET/CT. A joint position statement by the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM), the European Society of Cardiac Radiology (ESCR) and the European Council of Nuclear Cardiology (ECNC).

Authors: Albert Flotats; Juhani Knuuti; Matthias Gutberlet; Claudio Marcassa; Frank M Bengel; Philippe A Kaufmann; Michael R Rees; Birger Hesse
Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2011-01 Impact factor: 9.236

Review 7. Stress perfusion magnetic resonance imaging of the heart.

Authors: Michael Jerosch-Herold; Olaf Muehling
Journal: Top Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2008-02

8. Diagnostic performance of noninvasive myocardial perfusion imaging using single-photon emission computed tomography, cardiac magnetic resonance, and positron emission tomography imaging for the detection of obstructive coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis.

Authors: Caroline Jaarsma; Tim Leiner; Sebastiaan C Bekkers; Harry J Crijns; Joachim E Wildberger; Eike Nagel; Patricia J Nelemans; Simon Schalla
Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2012-05-08 Impact factor: 24.094

Review 9. Diagnostic performance of stress myocardial perfusion imaging for coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors: Marcus C de Jong; Tessa S S Genders; Robert-Jan van Geuns; Adriaan Moelker; M G Myriam Hunink
Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2012-04-19 Impact factor: 5.315

10. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance and single-photon emission computed tomography for diagnosis of coronary heart disease (CE-MARC): a prospective trial.

Authors: John P Greenwood; Neil Maredia; John F Younger; Julia M Brown; Jane Nixon; Colin C Everett; Petra Bijsterveld; John P Ridgway; Aleksandra Radjenovic; Catherine J Dickinson; Stephen G Ball; Sven Plein
Journal: Lancet Date: 2011-12-22 Impact factor: 79.321

10 in total

1 in total

1. Non-invasive evaluation of culprit lesions by PET imaging: shifting the clinical paradigm away from resultant anatomy toward causative physiology.

Authors: Federico Caobelli; Frank M Bengel
Journal: Cardiovasc Diagn Ther Date: 2014-12

1 in total