Literature DB >> 17563235

Tone sequences with conflicting fundamental pitch and timbre changes are heard differently by musicians and nonmusicians.

Annemarie Seither-Preisler1, Linda Johnson, Katrin Krumbholz, Andrea Nobbe, Roy Patterson, Stefan Seither, Bernd Lütkenhöner.   

Abstract

An Auditory Ambiguity Test (AAT) was taken twice by nonmusicians, musical amateurs, and professional musicians. The AAT comprised different tone pairs, presented in both within-pair orders, in which overtone spectra rising in pitch were associated with missing fundamental frequencies (F0) falling in pitch, and vice versa. The F0 interval ranged from 2 to 9 semitones. The participants were instructed to decide whether the perceived pitch went up or down; no information was provided on the ambiguity of the stimuli. The majority of professionals classified the pitch changes according to F0, even at the smallest interval. By contrast, most nonmusicians classified according to the overtone spectra, except in the case of the largest interval. Amateurs ranged in between. A plausible explanation for the systematic group differences is that musical practice systematically shifted the perceptual focus from spectral toward missing-F0 pitch, although alternative explanations such as different genetic dispositions of musicians and nonmusicians cannot be ruled out. ((c) 2007 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17563235      PMCID: PMC2821799          DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.33.3.743

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  15 in total

1.  Encoding of the temporal regularity of sound in the human brainstem.

Authors:  T D Griffiths; S Uppenkamp; I Johnsrude; O Josephs; R D Patterson
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Analyzing pitch chroma and pitch height in the human brain.

Authors:  Jason D Warren; Stefan Uppenkamp; Roy D Patterson; Timothy D Griffiths
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.691

3.  Neuromagnetic evidence for a pitch processing center in Heschl's gyrus.

Authors:  K Krumbholz; R D Patterson; A Seither-Preisler; C Lammertmann; B Lütkenhöner
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 5.357

4.  Interaction between the neuromagnetic responses to sound energy onset and pitch onset suggests common generators.

Authors:  A Seither-Preisler; K Krumbholz; R Patterson; S Seither; B Lütkenhöner
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.386

5.  Dominance of missing fundamental versus spectrally cued pitch: individual differences for complex tones with unresolved harmonics.

Authors:  Remco Renken; J Esther C Wiersinga-Post; Sonja Tomaskovic; Hendrikus Duifhuis
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Influence of spectral locus and F0 changes on the pitch and timbre of complex tones.

Authors:  P G Singh; I J Hirsh
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Analytic and synthetic pitch of two-tone complexes.

Authors:  A J Houtsma; J F Fleuren
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Pitch perception of two-frequency stimuli.

Authors:  G F Smoorenburg
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1970-10       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  A neural representation of pitch salience in nonprimary human auditory cortex revealed with functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Hector Penagos; Jennifer R Melcher; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-07-28       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  From noise to pitch: transient and sustained responses of the auditory evoked field.

Authors:  A Seither-Preisler; Roy D Patterson; K Krumbholz; S Seither; B Lütkenhöner
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2006-07-11       Impact factor: 3.208

View more
  20 in total

1.  Does fundamental-frequency discrimination measure virtual pitch discrimination?

Authors:  Christophe Micheyl; Kristin Divis; David M Wrobleski; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Interindividual variability in auditory scene analysis revealed by confidence judgements.

Authors:  C Pelofi; V de Gardelle; P Egré; D Pressnitzer
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-01-02       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Size and synchronization of auditory cortex promotes musical, literacy, and attentional skills in children.

Authors:  Annemarie Seither-Preisler; Richard Parncutt; Peter Schneider
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Electrophysiological Evidence of Early Cortical Sensitivity to Human Conspecific Mimic Voice as a Distinct Category of Natural Sound.

Authors:  William J Talkington; Jeremy Donai; Alexandra S Kadner; Molly L Layne; Andrew Forino; Sijin Wen; Si Gao; Margeaux M Gray; Alexandria J Ashraf; Gabriela N Valencia; Brandon D Smith; Stephanie K Khoo; Stephen J Gray; Norman Lass; Julie A Brefczynski-Lewis; Susannah Engdahl; David Graham; Chris A Frum; James W Lewis
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Perception of the pitch of unresolved harmonics by 3- and 7-month-old human infants.

Authors:  Bonnie K Lau; Lynne A Werner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Context sensitivity and invariance in perception of octave-ambiguous tones.

Authors:  Bruno H Repp; Jacqueline M Thompson
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2009-11-26

7.  Pitch strength decreases as F0 and harmonic resolution increase in complex tones composed exclusively of high harmonics.

Authors:  D Timothy Ives; Roy D Patterson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Noise induced hearing loss and other hearing complaints among musicians of symphony orchestras.

Authors:  E J M Jansen; H W Helleman; W A Dreschler; J A P M de Laat
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2008-04-11       Impact factor: 3.015

9.  Pitch enumeration: failure to subitize in audition.

Authors:  Neil M McLachlan; David J T Marco; Sarah J Wilson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-02       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Neurophysiological influence of musical training on speech perception.

Authors:  Antoine J Shahin
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-06-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.