Literature DB >> 15281391

The relation of multiple-schedule behavioral contrast to deprivation, time in session, and within-session changes in responding.

Frances K McSweeney1, Samantha Swindell, Eric S Murphy, Benjamin P Kowal.   

Abstract

Pigeons' keypecking was reinforced by food on baseline schedules of multiple variable interval (VI) x VI x and on contrast schedules of multiple VI x VI y. Deprivation of food was varied by maintaining subjects at 75%, 85%, and 95% (+/- 2%) of their free-feeding weights. Positive and negative behavioral contrast were observed. The size of the contrast was not systematically altered by changes in deprivation. Positive and negative contrast were both larger later in the session than they were earlier. Within-session decreases in responding were steeper for the baseline than for the contrast schedules for positive contrast. Within-session decreases were steeper for the contrast than for the baseline schedules for negative contrast. These results were predicted by the idea that different amounts of habituation to the reinforcer during the baseline and contrast schedules contribute to behavioral contrast. The results show that contrast occurs under conditions that reduce the effect of the following component. The results support the assumption that positive and negative contrast are produced by symmetrical theoretical variables.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15281391     DOI: 10.3758/bf03196020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Learn Behav        ISSN: 1543-4494            Impact factor:   1.986


  34 in total

1.  A progression for generating variable-interval schedules.

Authors:  M FLESHLER; H S HOFFMAN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1962-10       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  The effect of deprivation and frequency of reinforcement on variable-interval responding.

Authors:  F C Clark
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1958-08       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Another look at contrast in multiple schedules.

Authors:  B A Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  On the law of effect.

Authors:  R J Herrnstein
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-03       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Urges to eat and drink in rats.

Authors:  E F ADOLPH
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1947-11-01

6.  Suppression by reinforcement, a model for multiple-schedule behavioral contrast.

Authors:  F K McSweeney
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 1.777

7.  Does oral experience terminate ingestion?

Authors:  S E Swithers; W G Hall
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 3.868

8.  Effects of changing interstimulus interval during habituation in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  B S Broster; C H Rankin
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 1.912

9.  Behavioral competition: a mechanism for schedule interactions.

Authors:  J M Hinson; J E Staddon
Journal:  Science       Date:  1978-10-27       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Habituation of oromotor responding to oral infusions in rat pups.

Authors:  S E Swithers-Mulvey; G L Miller; W G Hall
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 3.868

View more
  1 in total

1.  Dynamic changes in reinforcer effectiveness: satiation and habituation have different implications for theory and practice.

Authors:  Frances K McSweeney
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  2004
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.