Literature DB >> 24203657

Prospective factors contribute little to within-session changes in responding.

F K McSweeney1, J N Weatherly, S Swindell.   

Abstract

Five rats pressed levers for food delivered by a multiple variable interval 1-min variable interval 1-min schedule. In theunpredictable conditions, sessions were 20, 40, 60, 80, or 100 min long, determined randomly at the beginning of each session. In thepredictable conditions, each of these session durations was presented for 15 consecutive sessions. Rate of responding changed systematically within the session even when the end of the session was unpredictable. This implies that prospective factors related to anticipation of the end of the session are not necessary for producing withinsession changes in responding. Within-session patterns of responding were also similar for the predictable and unpredictable conditions. This suggests that prospective factors contributed little to the form of the within-session patterns under the present conditions.

Entities:  

Year:  1995        PMID: 24203657     DOI: 10.3758/BF03210962

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  13 in total

1.  A progression for generating variable-interval schedules.

Authors:  M FLESHLER; H S HOFFMAN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1962-10       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Another look at contrast in multiple schedules.

Authors:  B A Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  On the law of effect.

Authors:  R J Herrnstein
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-03       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  A two-state analysis of fixed-interval responding in the pigeon.

Authors:  B A Schneider
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-09       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Patterns of responding within sessions.

Authors:  F K McSweeney; J M Hinson
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Food satiation in the pigeon.

Authors:  T W REESE; M J HOGENSON
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1962-04       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Within-session responding as a function of post-session feedings.

Authors:  F K McSweeney; J Hatfield; T M Allen
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 1.777

8.  The detection of visual intensity differences by pigeons.

Authors:  W Hodos; J C Bonbright
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-11       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 9.  Responding changes systematically within sessions during conditioning procedures.

Authors:  F K McSweeney; J M Roll
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Arousal: its genesis and manifestation as response rate.

Authors:  P R Killeen; S J Hanson; S R Osborne
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 8.934

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Habituation of reinforcer effectiveness.

Authors:  David R Lloyd; Douglas J Medina; Larry W Hawk; Whitney D Fosco; Jerry B Richards
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-09
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.