Literature DB >> 16437283

Minilaparotomy cholecystectomy versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized study with special reference to obesity.

J Harju1, P Juvonen, M Eskelinen, P Miettinen, M Pääkkönen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Minilaparotomy cholecystectomy (MC) has recently challenged the role of the laparoscopic approach (LC) for cholecystectomies. However, the situation is far from clear when operating times and recovery are evaluated.
METHODS: Altogether 157 patients with uncomplicated symptomatic gallstones were randomized into MC (n = 85) and LC (n = 72) groups. Both groups were similar in terms of age, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) physical fitness classification, and operating surgeon.
RESULTS: The mean operating time was 55 +/- 19.5 min in the MC group and 79 +/- 27.0 min in the LC group (p < 0.0001). The postoperative hospital stay and length of sick leave did not differ between the two groups. There were no significant differences in postoperative pain, analgesic consumption, or postoperative pulmonary function between the groups. The body mass index did not influence operating time or patient recovery in either group. No major complications occurred in either groups.
CONCLUSION: The MC procedure seems to be a faster technique than the LC approach for noncomplicated gallstone disease, with no difference in recovery times. The MC procedure also seems to be suitable for the obese patient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16437283     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-004-2280-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  15 in total

1.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus mini-laparotomy cholecystectomy: a prospective, randomized, single-blind study.

Authors:  A Ros; L Gustafsson; H Krook; C E Nordgren; A Thorell; G Wallin; E Nilsson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Randomized clinical trial of conventional cholecystectomy versus minicholecystectomy.

Authors:  R Schmitz; V Rohde; J Treckmann; S Shah
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  A randomized, prospective, blinded comparison of postoperative pain, metabolic response, and perceived health after laparoscopic and small incision cholecystectomy.

Authors:  D M Squirrell; A W Majeed; G Troy; J E Peacock; J P Nicholl; A G Johnson
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 3.982

4.  Laparoscopic and minilaparotomy cholecystectomy: a randomized trial comparing postoperative pain and pulmonary function.

Authors:  A J McMahon; I T Russell; G Ramsay; G Sunderland; J N Baxter; J R Anderson; D Galloway; P J O'Dwyer
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 3.982

5.  Cholecystectomy: comparison of minilaparotomy and laparoscopy.

Authors:  A M Mäkinen; I H Nordback
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  1995 Apr-Jun

6.  Minilaparotomy cholecystectomy.

Authors:  M M al-Tameem
Journal:  J R Coll Surg Edinb       Date:  1993-06

7.  Small-incision (mini-laparotomy) versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a retrospective study in a university hospital.

Authors:  Theodoros Syrakos; Polichronis Antonitsis; Emmanouil Zacharakis; Athanasios Takis; Antonia Manousari; Konstantinos Bakogiannis; George Efthimiopoulos; Ignatios Achoulias; Anastasia Trikoupi; Dimitrios Kiskinis
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2004-05-07       Impact factor: 3.445

8.  A new minimally invasive technique for cholecystectomy. Subxiphoid "minimal stress triangle": microceliotomy.

Authors:  N S Tyagi; M C Meredith; J C Lumb; R G Cacdac; C C Vanterpool; K R Rayls; W D Zerega; A Silbergleit
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Laparoscopy: the preferred method of cholecystectomy in the morbidly obese.

Authors:  R H Miles; R E Carballo; R A Prinz; M McMahon; G Pulawski; R N Olen; D L Dahlinghaus
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 3.982

10.  Laparoscopic versus minilaparotomy cholecystectomy: a randomised trial.

Authors:  A J McMahon; I T Russell; J N Baxter; S Ross; J R Anderson; C G Morran; G Sunderland; D Galloway; G Ramsay; P J O'Dwyer
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1994-01-15       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  Delayed assessment and eager adoption of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: implications for developing surgical technologies.

Authors:  Alexander C Allori; I Michael Leitman; Elizabeth Heitman
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-09-07       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus mini-laparotomy cholecystectomy: a meta-analysis of randomised control trials.

Authors:  Sanjay Purkayastha; Henry S Tilney; Panagiotis Georgiou; Thanos Athanasiou; Paris P Tekkis; Ara W Darzi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-05-22       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Gallstones.

Authors:  Grant Sanders; Andrew N Kingsnorth
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-08-11

4.  A prospective, randomized study comparing minilaparotomy and laparoscopic cholecystectomy as a day-surgery procedure: 5-year outcome.

Authors:  Samuli Aspinen; Jukka Harju; Petri Juvonen; Kalevi Karjalainen; Hannu Kokki; Hannu Paajanen; Matti Eskelinen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-10-03       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for the obese patient: a subset analysis from a prospective, randomized, double-blind study.

Authors:  Tatyan Clarke; Namir Katkhouda; Rodney J Mason; Bon C Cheng; Jaisa Olasky; Helen J Sohn; Ashkan Moazzez; Jeffrey Algra; Eric Chaghouri; Thomas V Berne
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-10-29       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Improvement in the quality of life following cholecystectomy: a randomized multicenter study of health status (RAND-36) in patients with laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus minilaparotomy cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Samuli Aspinen; Jari Kärkkäinen; Jukka Harju; Petri Juvonen; Hannu Kokki; Matti Eskelinen
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Day case laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with high BMI: Experience from a UK centre.

Authors:  A Tandon; G Sunderland; Q M Nunes; N Misra; M Shrotri
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 1.891

8.  Ten-year outcome after minilaparotomy versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomised trial.

Authors:  Jukka Harju; Samuli Aspinen; Petri Juvonen; Hannu Kokki; Matti Eskelinen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-01-24       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 9.  Open, small-incision, or laparoscopic cholecystectomy for patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis. An overview of Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group reviews.

Authors:  Frederik Keus; Hein G Gooszen; Cornelis Jhm van Laarhoven
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-01-20

10.  Obesity and appendicitis: Laparoscopy versus open technique.

Authors:  Ömer Vefik Özozan; Cem Emir Güldoğan; Emre Gündoğdu; Mehmet Mahir Özmen
Journal:  Turk J Surg       Date:  2020-03-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.