Literature DB >> 24196543

A prospective, randomized study comparing minilaparotomy and laparoscopic cholecystectomy as a day-surgery procedure: 5-year outcome.

Samuli Aspinen1, Jukka Harju, Petri Juvonen, Kalevi Karjalainen, Hannu Kokki, Hannu Paajanen, Matti Eskelinen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The long-term outcome between laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) and minilaparotomy (MC) has not been compared in randomised trials as day-surgery procedures. We therefore investigated the outcome after day-case LC and MC in 48 patients.
METHODS: Initially 60 patients with noncomplicated symptomatic gallstone disease were randomly allocated to a day-case MC (n = 29) or LC (n = 31) over a period of 2 years (2006-2008), and 48 of them (80 %) were reached for a follow-up interview 5.8 (4.8-6.9) years after the surgery.
RESULTS: Baseline parameters were similar in the two groups: 1 of 21 MCs and 2 of 27 LCs were converted to open laparotomy. The prevalence of chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) 5 years after the procedure was quite similar in the two groups: 3 of 21 (14 %) in the MC group and 1 of 27 (4 %; p = 0.2). Residual abdominal symptoms were common, but the proportion was similar in both groups (43 % in MC and 30 % in LC group, p = 0.26). In the MC group 100 % and in the LC group 89 % (18/21) were satisfied with the cosmetic outcome (p = 0.11). Quality of life (QoL) improved for 16 of 21 (76 %) in the MC group and 26 of 27 (96 %) in the LC group (p = 0.38), and patients in both groups were satisfied with the operation overall.
CONCLUSIONS: Day-case MC and LC patients have a quite similar long-term outcome with no significant difference regarding residual abdominal symptoms, cosmetic satisfaction, QoL, or CPSP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24196543     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-013-3214-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  23 in total

1.  Minilaparotomy cholecystectomy versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized study with special reference to obesity.

Authors:  J Harju; P Juvonen; M Eskelinen; P Miettinen; M Pääkkönen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-01-25       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Feasibility of day-care open cholecystectomy: evaluation in an inpatient model.

Authors:  S Thomas; J Singh; P K Bishnoi; A Kumar
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 1.872

3.  Minicholecystectomy: a safe, cost-effective day surgery procedure.

Authors:  A K Seale; W P Ledet
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1999-03

4.  Comparison of the quality of life after minilaparotomy cholecystectomy versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Jukka Harju; Matti Pääkkönen; Matti Eskelinen
Journal:  Isr Med Assoc J       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 0.892

5.  Outpatient open cholecystectomy.

Authors:  E C Saltzstein; L C Mercer; J B Peacock; S H Dougherty
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1992-03

Review 6.  Evaluation of quality of life after laparoscopic surgery: evidence-based guidelines of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery.

Authors:  D Korolija; S Sauerland; S Wood-Dauphinée; C C Abbou; E Eypasch; M García Caballero; M A Lumsden; B Millat; J R T Monson; G Nilsson; R Pointner; W Schwenk; A Shamiyeh; A Szold; E Targarona; B Ure; E Neugebauer
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-04-27       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Ten-year outcome after minilaparotomy versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomised trial.

Authors:  Jukka Harju; Samuli Aspinen; Petri Juvonen; Hannu Kokki; Matti Eskelinen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-01-24       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Minilaparotomy cholecystectomy as a day surgery procedure: a prospective clinical pilot study.

Authors:  J Harju; M Pääkkönen; M Eskelinen
Journal:  Scand J Surg       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.360

9.  Expertise-based randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus small-incision open cholecystectomy.

Authors:  M H Rosenmüller; M Thorén Örnberg; T Myrnäs; O Lundberg; E Nilsson; M M Haapamäki
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  Development of symptoms and complications in individuals with asymptomatic gallstones.

Authors:  I Halldestam; E-L Enell; E Kullman; K Borch
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  5 in total

1.  Measurement of patient-reported outcomes after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Harry C Alexander; Cindy H Nguyen; Matthew R Moore; Adam S Bartlett; Jacqueline A Hannam; Garth H Poole; Alan F Merry
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Improvement in the quality of life following cholecystectomy: a randomized multicenter study of health status (RAND-36) in patients with laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus minilaparotomy cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Samuli Aspinen; Jari Kärkkäinen; Jukka Harju; Petri Juvonen; Hannu Kokki; Matti Eskelinen
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 3.  [Quality of life and visceral surgery].

Authors:  E Bollschweiler; C Baltin; F Berlth; S P Mönig; A H Hölscher
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 4.  Laparoscopic surgery: a narrative review of pharmacotherapy in pain management.

Authors:  Sari Sjövall; Merja Kokki; Hannu Kokki
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 9.546

5.  A Dose-Finding Study of Dexketoprofen in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Randomized Clinical Trial on Effects on the Analgesic Concentration of Oxycodone.

Authors:  Annika Piirainen; Hannu Kokki; Satu Immonen; Matti Eskelinen; Merja R Häkkinen; Heidi Hautajärvi; Merja Kokki
Journal:  Drugs R D       Date:  2015-12
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.