Literature DB >> 1411956

Laparoscopy: the preferred method of cholecystectomy in the morbidly obese.

R H Miles1, R E Carballo, R A Prinz, M McMahon, G Pulawski, R N Olen, D L Dahlinghaus.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Morbid obesity has been considered a contraindication to laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC).
METHODS: To evaluate this we reviewed our first 201 patients undergoing LC and compared the operative procedure and outcome in morbidly obese (greater than or equal to 100 pounds over ideal body weight [IBW]) and nonobese patients. We also compared a group of morbidly obese patients who underwent standard open cholecystectomy (n = 11) with the obese group undergoing LC (n = 21). All groups were comparable in terms of age, sex, and symptoms (acute vs chronic). The obese groups undergoing LC and open cholecystectomy had similar weights (134.0 +/- 9.4 pounds over IBW [range, 100 to 286 pounds] and 133.8 +/- 6.0 pounds over IBW [range, 108 to 170 pounds], respectively) and were significantly different from the nonobese group undergoing LC (28.3 +/- 2.0 pounds over IBW [range, 23 to 98 pounds]). Parameters evaluated included operative time, resumption of normal diet, length of postoperative hospitalization, complications, conversion to open procedure, and ability to perform cholangiography.
RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between the obese and nonobese groups undergoing LC in any parameters studied (operative time, 151.7 +/- 4.0 minutes vs 160.7 +/- 9.9 minutes; tolerance of diet, 1.2 +/- 0.1 days vs 1.1 +/- 0.1 days; time to discharge, 2.0 +/- 0.1 days vs 1.8 +/- 0.2 days; complications, 7.0% vs 0.0%). Operative time (117.6 +/- 11.6 minutes) was shorter (p = 0.45) in obese patients undergoing open cholecystectomy. However, time to normal diet and length of postoperative hospitalization were significantly longer (3.1 and 4.6 days, respectively; p less than 0.01), and there were more complications (18.2%).
CONCLUSIONS: Rather than being contraindicated in the morbidly obese, LC appears to be the preferred method of cholecystectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1411956

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgery        ISSN: 0039-6060            Impact factor:   3.982


  22 in total

1.  Evidence to support the use of laparoscopic over open appendicectomy for obese individuals: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Benjamin L Woodham; Michael R Cox; Guy D Eslick
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Minilaparotomy cholecystectomy versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized study with special reference to obesity.

Authors:  J Harju; P Juvonen; M Eskelinen; P Miettinen; M Pääkkönen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-01-25       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  The impact of a high body mass index on laparoscopy assisted gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Hyuk-Joon Lee; Hyung-Ho Kim; Min-Chan Kim; Seong-Yeob Ryu; Wook Kim; Kyo-Young Song; Gyu-Seok Cho; Sang-Uk Han; Woo Jin Hyung; Seung-Wan Ryu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-04-03       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: are patients with biliary pancreatitis at increased operative risk?

Authors:  B J Ammori; D Davides; A Vezakis; M Larvin; M J McMahon
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-02-18       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Day case laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with high BMI: Experience from a UK centre.

Authors:  A Tandon; G Sunderland; Q M Nunes; N Misra; M Shrotri
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 1.891

6.  Obesity should not influence the management of appendicitis.

Authors:  S Towfigh; F Chen; N Katkhouda; R Kelso; H Sohn; T V Berne; R J Mason
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-03-18       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Male gender is not a risk factor for the outcome of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a single surgeon experience.

Authors:  Abdulmohsen A Al-Mulhim
Journal:  Saudi J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.485

Review 8.  Laparoscopic resection of colon Cancer: consensus of the European Association of Endoscopic Surgery (EAES).

Authors:  R Veldkamp; M Gholghesaei; H J Bonjer; D W Meijer; M Buunen; J Jeekel; B Anderberg; M A Cuesta; A Cuschierl; A Fingerhut; J W Fleshman; P J Guillou; E Haglind; J Himpens; C A Jacobi; J J Jakimowicz; F Koeckerling; A M Lacy; E Lezoche; J R Monson; M Morino; E Neugebauer; S D Wexner; R L Whelan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-06-23       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer in obese and nonobese patients.

Authors:  K Yasuda; M Inomata; N Shiraishi; K Izumi; K Ishikawa; S Kitano
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-06-23       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Unexpected difficulties in randomizing patients in a surgical trial: a prospective study comparing extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy with open cholecystectomy.

Authors:  P W Plaisier; M Y Berger; R L van der Hul; H G Nijs; R den Toom; O T Terpstra; H A Bruining
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1994 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.352

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.