Literature DB >> 27087326

Day case laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with high BMI: Experience from a UK centre.

A Tandon1, G Sunderland1, Q M Nunes1,2, N Misra1, M Shrotri1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Symptomatic gall stones may require laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), which is one of the most commonly performed general surgical operations in the western world. Patients with a high body mass index (BMI) are at increased risk of having gall stones, and are often considered at high risk of surgical complications due to their increased BMI. We believe that day case surgery could nevertheless have significant benefits in terms of potential cost savings and patient satisfaction in this population. We therefore compared the outcomes of day case patients undergoing LC stratified by BMI, with a specific focus on the safety and success of the procedure in obese and morbidly obese groups.
METHODS: We reviewed a database of day case procedures performed between January 2004 and December 2012, including all patients with symptomatic gall stone disease who underwent LC. The patients were divided in four BMI groups: less than 25 kg/m(2), 25-29 kg/m(2), 30-39 kg/m(2) and 40 kg/m(2) or above.
RESULTS: The overall success rate for day case surgery was 78%. There were no significant differences in rates of intra-abdominal collection or readmission with increasing BMI. However, increasing BMI was associated with a significant increase in the rate of wound infection.
CONCLUSIONS: LC in patients with a high BMI is safe and can be performed effectively as a day case procedure.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Body mass index; Complications; Day case; Laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27087326      PMCID: PMC5227041          DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2016.0125

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  33 in total

Review 1.  Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy for patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis.

Authors:  F Keus; J A F de Jong; H G Gooszen; C J H M van Laarhoven
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2006-10-18

2.  The contribution of acute cholecystitis, obesity, and previous abdominal surgery on the outcome of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Constantinos Simopoulos; Sotirios Botaitis; Anastasios J Karayiannakis; Grigorios Tripsianis; Michail Pitiakoudis; Alexandros Polychronidis; Michail Pitiakoudis Alexandros Polychronidis
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 0.688

3.  Minilaparotomy cholecystectomy versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized study with special reference to obesity.

Authors:  J Harju; P Juvonen; M Eskelinen; P Miettinen; M Pääkkönen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-01-25       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Day case and short stay surgery: 2.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2011-03-18       Impact factor: 6.955

5.  Impact of obesity and associated diseases on outcome after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Hannu Paajanen; Pirjo Käkelä; Satu Suuronen; Juuso Paajanen; Petri Juvonen; Jussi Pihlajamäki
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.719

6.  A prospective study of ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy: training economic, and patient benefits.

Authors:  P K Jain; J D Hayden; P C Sedman; C M S Royston; C J O'Boyle
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-05-26       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Laparoscopic colectomy for sigmoid diverticulitis in obese and nonobese patients: a prospective comparative study.

Authors:  J J Tuech; N Regenet; S Hennekinne; P Pessaux; R Bergamaschi; J P Arnaud
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Day surgery and body mass index: results of a national survey.

Authors:  M Atkins; J White; K Ahmed
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 6.955

9.  Laparoscopy: the preferred method of cholecystectomy in the morbidly obese.

Authors:  R H Miles; R E Carballo; R A Prinz; M McMahon; G Pulawski; R N Olen; D L Dahlinghaus
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 10.  Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for uncomplicated biliary colic.

Authors:  Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy; Rahul Koti; Giuseppe Fusai; Brian R Davidson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-06-30
View more
  4 in total

1.  The Cholecystectomy As A Day Case (CAAD) Score: A Validated Score of Preoperative Predictors of Successful Day-Case Cholecystectomy Using the CholeS Data Set.

Authors:  A M El-Sharkawy; N Tewari; R S Vohra
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Predictive Factors for a Long Hospital Stay in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Wasana Ko-Iam; Trichak Sandhu; Sahattaya Paiboonworachat; Paisal Pongchairerks; Anon Chotirosniramit; Narain Chotirosniramit; Kamtone Chandacham; Tidarat Jirapongcharoenlap; Sunhawit Junrungsee
Journal:  Int J Hepatol       Date:  2017-01-23

Review 3.  Patient selection for ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A systematic review.

Authors:  Weiwei Chen; Qiang Wu; Ning Fu; Zhiming Yang; Jingcheng Hao
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2022 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.407

4.  Operative Difficulty, Morbidity and Mortality Are Unrelated to Obesity in Elective or Emergency Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy and Bile Duct Exploration.

Authors:  Ahmad H M Nassar; Khurram S Khan; Hwei J Ng; Mahmoud Sallam
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 3.267

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.