Literature DB >> 10380664

The "inverse problem" solved for a three-dimensional model of the cochlea. III. Brushing-up the solution method.

E de Boer1, A L Nuttall.   

Abstract

In two earlier papers [de Boer, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 98, 896-903 and 904-910 (1995)] the inherent problems of the inverse-solution method in cochlear mechanics were described. The present paper shows results obtained with a more universal solution method. With the new method it is possible to construct a three-dimensional model of the cochlea producing a response that accurately simulates a measured mechanical basilar-membrane response. With earlier methods this could not be done. The inverse solution invariably yields that, with low stimulus levels, the model simulating a viable cochlea must be locally active. For the response of a dead animal a passive model is sufficient. Once more the inherent intricacies and problems of the inverse-solution method are discussed. Conservation of fluid volume leads to the concept of the "virtual stapes velocity." For best results, the input signal to the inverse-solution procedure should be acquired in the form of a "composite cross-correlation spectrum." Inverse analysis can, under certain circumstances, produce aberrant results. In this paper it is shown why the resulting impedance function is the most accurate in the region of the response peak. Therefore, it is unlikely that a passive model would exist of which the response simulates the data obtained from a healthy animal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10380664     DOI: 10.1121/1.424669

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  9 in total

1.  Reply to "on cochlear impedances and the miscomputation of power gain" by Shera et Al. J. Assoc. Re. Otolaryngol.

Authors:  Tianying Ren; Wenxuan He; Peter G Gillespie
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-10-21

2.  Physics underlying the physiology of the ear.

Authors:  Egbert de Boer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Spontaneous basilar-membrane oscillation (SBMO) and coherent reflection.

Authors:  Egbert de Boer; Alfred L Nuttall
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2006-01-21

4.  Cochlear partition anatomy and motion in humans differ from the classic view of mammals.

Authors:  Stefan Raufer; John J Guinan; Hideko Heidi Nakajima
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Inverse-solution method for a class of non-classical cochlear models.

Authors:  Egbert de Boer; Alfred L Nuttall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  An analytic physically motivated model of the mammalian cochlea.

Authors:  Samiya A Alkhairy; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Frequency tuning of medial-olivocochlear-efferent acoustic reflexes in humans as functions of probe frequency.

Authors:  Watjana Lilaonitkul; John J Guinan
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  The Elusive Cochlear Filter: Wave Origin of Cochlear Cross-Frequency Masking.

Authors:  Alessandro Altoè; Karolina K Charaziak; James B Dewey; Arturo Moleti; Renata Sisto; John S Oghalai; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2021-10-22

9.  Cochlear Outer-Hair-Cell Power Generation and Viscous Fluid Loss.

Authors:  Yanli Wang; Charles R Steele; Sunil Puria
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.