Literature DB >> 24203691

Screening mammography and constructs from the transtheoretical model: Associations using two definitions of the stages-of-adoption.

W Rakowski1, B Ehrich, C E Dubé, D N Pearlman, M G Goldstein, K K Peterson, B K Rimer, H Woolverton.   

Abstract

The two purposes of this investigation were: (a) to examine whether an association existed between stages of adopting regular mammography and decision-making constructs from the Transtheoretical Model (TTM) of behavior change, and (b) to determine whether any such associations would be found for each of the two ways of defining the stages-of-adoption. One method integrated past screening history with a report of future intention for screening; the other method used a single item with predetermined response categories. Data were from the baseline survey of 1,323 women aged 50-74 who were recruited as part of an intervention study through a local Health Maintenance Organization. Results showed that both ways of defining stages of adopting regular mammography were associated with decisional balance and processes-of-change. The method that integrated past history plus intention provided somewhat better discrimination among stages. Women who were labeled as being at "Risk of Relapse," and those who said they waited for a "Provider's Recommendation," may be useful groups to add to the set of stages that have been employed so far by the TTM. In addition, a tendency to avoid the health care system in general was used as a process-of-change to complement the mammography-specific processes.

Entities:  

Year:  1996        PMID: 24203691     DOI: 10.1007/BF02909581

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Behav Med        ISSN: 0883-6612


  30 in total

1.  American Cancer Society guidelines on screening for breast cancer. An overview.

Authors:  G D Dodd
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1992-04-01       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Assessing elements of women's decisions about mammography.

Authors:  W Rakowski; C E Dube; B H Marcus; J O Prochaska; W F Velicer; D B Abrams
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.267

3.  Multistrategy health education program to increase mammography use among women ages 65 and older.

Authors:  B K Rimer; N Resch; E King; E Ross; C Lerman; A Boyce; H Kessler; P F Engstrom
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1992 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.792

4.  Mammography-related beliefs of older women. A survey of an HMO population.

Authors:  E King; B K Rimer; A Balshem; E Ross; J Seay
Journal:  J Aging Health       Date:  1993-02

5.  Deficiencies in the analysis of breast cancer screening data.

Authors:  E A Sickles; D B Kopans
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1993-10-20       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  Effect of a community health center intervention on breast cancer screening among Hispanic American women.

Authors:  J G Zapka; D R Harris; D Hosmer; M E Costanza; E Mas; R Barth
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  A randomized trial of the impact of risk assessment and feedback on participation in mammography screening.

Authors:  S J Curry; S H Taplin; C Anderman; W E Barlow; C McBride
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 4.018

Review 8.  The Save our Sisters Project. A social network strategy for reaching rural black women.

Authors:  E Eng
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1993-08-01       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  The importance of physician encouragement in breast cancer screening of older women.

Authors:  K E Grady; J P Lemkau; J M McVay; S T Reisine
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 4.018

10.  Report of the International Workshop on Screening for Breast Cancer.

Authors:  S W Fletcher; W Black; R Harris; B K Rimer; S Shapiro
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1993-10-20       Impact factor: 13.506

View more
  25 in total

1.  Using the interdependence model to understand spousal influence on colorectal cancer screening intentions: a structural equation model.

Authors:  Sharon Manne; Deborah Kashy; David S Weinberg; Joseph A Boscarino; Deborah J Bowen
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2012-06

2.  Ethnic differences in decisional balance and stages of mammography adoption.

Authors:  Regina Otero-Sabogal; Susan Stewart; Sarah J Shema; Rena J Pasick
Journal:  Health Educ Behav       Date:  2006-08-04

3.  Estimating development cost for a tailored interactive computer program to enhance colorectal cancer screening compliance.

Authors:  David R Lairson; Yu-Chia Chang; Judith L Bettencourt; Sally W Vernon; Anthony Greisinger
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2006-06-23       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Stage of change for making an informed decision about Medicare health plans.

Authors:  Deborah A Levesque; Carol O Cummins; Janice M Prochaska; James O Prochaska
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Evaluating the stage of change model to a cervical cancer screening intervention among Ohio Appalachian women.

Authors:  Jessica L Krok-Schoen; Jill M Oliveri; Gregory S Young; Mira L Katz; Cathy M Tatum; Electra D Paskett
Journal:  Women Health       Date:  2015-10-19

6.  A randomized trial to increase colonoscopy screening in members of high-risk families in the colorectal cancer family registry and cancer genetics network.

Authors:  Jan T Lowery; Nora Horick; Anita Y Kinney; Dianne M Finkelstein; Kathleen Garrett; Robert W Haile; Noralane M Lindor; Polly A Newcomb; Robert S Sandler; Carol Burke; Deirdre A Hill; Dennis J Ahnen
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 4.254

7.  Correlates of colorectal cancer screening compliance among urban Hispanics.

Authors:  Sherri Sheinfeld Gorin
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2005-04

8.  Healthy colon, healthy life: a novel colorectal cancer screening intervention.

Authors:  Judith M E Walsh; Rene Salazar; Tung T Nguyen; Celia Kaplan; Lam Kieu Nguyen; Jimmy Hwang; Stephen J McPhee; Rena J Pasick
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 5.043

9.  Colorectal cancer screening among low-income African Americans in East Harlem: a theoretical approach to understanding barriers and promoters to screening.

Authors:  Catalina Lawsin; Katherine DuHamel; Anthony Weiss; William Rakowski; Lina Jandorf
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.671

10.  Effectiveness of Cultivando la Salud: a breast and cervical cancer screening promotion program for low-income Hispanic women.

Authors:  María E Fernández; Alicia Gonzales; Guillermo Tortolero-Luna; Janet Williams; Monica Saavedra-Embesi; Wenyaw Chan; Sally W Vernon
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2009-03-19       Impact factor: 9.308

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.