Literature DB >> 16396076

Response rate is not an effective mediator of learned stimulus equivalence in pigeons.

Andrea J Frank1, Edward A Wasserman.   

Abstract

We explored response rate as a possible mediator of learned stimulus equivalence. Five pigeons were trained to discriminate four clip art pictures presented during a 10-sec discrete-trial fixed interval (FI) schedule: two paired with a one-pellet reinforcer, which supported a low rate of responding, and two paired with a nine-pellet reinforcer, which supported a high rate of responding. After subjects associated one stimulus from each of these pairs with a discriminative choice response, researchers presented two new clip art stimuli during a 10-sec FI: one trained with a differential reinforcement of low rate schedule (DRL) after the FI and the other trained with a differential reinforcement of high rate schedule (DRH) after the FI. Each of the stimuli that were withheld during choice training was later shown to see if the choice responses would transfer to these stimuli. The results suggest that response rate alone does not mediate learned stimulus equivalence.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16396076     DOI: 10.3758/bf03192858

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Learn Behav        ISSN: 1543-4494            Impact factor:   1.986


  7 in total

1.  Superordinate category formation in pigeons: association with a common delay or probability of food reinforcement makes perceptually dissimilar stimuli functionally equivalent.

Authors:  S L Astley; E A Wasserman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1999-10

2.  Superordinate categorization via learned stimulus equivalence: quantity of reinforcement, hedonic value, and the nature of the mediator.

Authors:  S L Astley; J J Peissig; E A Wasserman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2001-07

3.  Conditional-outcome choice behavior in rats.

Authors:  F A LOGAN
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1962-09       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  Entropy detection by pigeons: response to mixed visual displays after same-different discrimination training.

Authors:  M E Young; E A Wasserman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1997-04

5.  Acquired equivalence and distinctiveness of cues.

Authors:  R C Honey; G Hall
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1989-10

6.  On the relationship between differential outcomes and differential sample responding in matching-to-sample.

Authors:  P J Urcuioli; T DeMarse
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1994-07

7.  Role of differential sample responding in the differential outcomes effect involving delayed matching by pigeons.

Authors:  T R Zentall; L M Sherburne
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1994-10
  7 in total
  2 in total

1.  Effects of within-class differences in sample responding on acquired sample equivalence.

Authors:  Peter J Urcuioli; Marco Vasconcelos
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 2.  Associative concept learning in animals.

Authors:  Thomas R Zentall; Edward A Wasserman; Peter J Urcuioli
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 2.468

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.