Literature DB >> 8046356

On the relationship between differential outcomes and differential sample responding in matching-to-sample.

P J Urcuioli1, T DeMarse.   

Abstract

Four experiments examined control over choice by differential sample responding in matching-to-sample with differential outcomes. In Experiment 1, pigeons initially learned to match with food versus no-food outcomes. Their performances later transferred to other samples to which responding versus not responding had been explicitly reinforced with a single outcome (food). In Experiment 2, pigeons initially learned to produce the comparisons by pecking one sample but not the other. Transfer was then observed to new samples associated with food versus no food (and thus often vs. seldomly pecked). Experiments 3 and 4 showed that transfer of matching required differential behavior to each sample set and did not depend on explicit conditioning of that behavior prior to acquisition. Together, these results show that differential sample behaviour provides a redundant cue for choice in differential outcome matching-to-sample.

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8046356     DOI: 10.1037//0097-7403.20.3.249

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process        ISSN: 0097-7403


  10 in total

1.  Sample-duration effects on pigeons' delayed matching as a function of predictability of duration.

Authors:  P J Urcuioli; T B DeMarse; K M Lionello
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  A procedure for generating differential "sample" responding without different exteroceptive stimuli.

Authors:  Karen M Lionello-DeNolf; Peter J Urcuioli
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Emergent identity matching after successive matching training. II: Reflexivity or transitivity.

Authors:  Peter J Urcuioli; Melissa Swisher
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Behavioral and associative effects of differential outcomes in discrimination learning.

Authors:  Peter J Urcuioli
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.986

5.  Associatively activated representations of food events resemble food outcome expectancies more closely than they resemble food-based memories.

Authors:  Daniel C Linwick; J Bruce Overmier
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 1.986

6.  Response rate is not an effective mediator of learned stimulus equivalence in pigeons.

Authors:  Andrea J Frank; Edward A Wasserman
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 1.986

7.  Pigeons learn to answer the question "where did you just peck?" and can report peck location when unexpectedly asked.

Authors:  Rebecca A Singer; Thomas R Zentall
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 1.986

8.  Effects of within-class differences in sample responding on acquired sample equivalence.

Authors:  Peter J Urcuioli; Marco Vasconcelos
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Associative symmetry and stimulus-class formation by pigeons: the role of non-reinforced baseline relations.

Authors:  Peter J Urcuioli
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 1.777

10.  The development of emergent differential sample behavior in pigeons.

Authors:  Peter J Urcuioli; Jada N Pierce; Karen M Lionello-DeNolf; Andrea Friedrich; J Gregor Fetterman; Courtney Green
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.468

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.