Literature DB >> 7964521

Role of differential sample responding in the differential outcomes effect involving delayed matching by pigeons.

T R Zentall1, L M Sherburne.   

Abstract

The role of differential sample responding in the differential outcomes effect was examined. In Experiment 1, we trained pigeons on a one-to-many matching task with differential sample responding required. Differential outcomes were associated with samples and comparisons, with comparisons only, or with neither samples nor comparisons. Slopes of delay functions for trials with pecked versus nonpecked samples suggested use of a single-code-default strategy in the nondifferential-outcomes group but not in the differential-outcomes groups. In Experiment 2, differential sample responding and differential outcomes were manipulated independently. Again, there were significant differences in the relative slopes of the delay functions. Results suggest that differential outcomes exert their effect independently of differential sample responding.

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7964521

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process        ISSN: 0097-7403


  10 in total

1.  Generalization of delayed matching to sample following training at different delays.

Authors:  R J Sargisson; K G White
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  On the effects of signaling reinforcer probability and magnitude in delayed matching to sample.

Authors:  Glenn S Brown; K Geoffrey White
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Behavioral and associative effects of differential outcomes in discrimination learning.

Authors:  Peter J Urcuioli
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.986

4.  Response rate is not an effective mediator of learned stimulus equivalence in pigeons.

Authors:  Andrea J Frank; Edward A Wasserman
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 1.986

5.  Matching-to-sample in pigeons: in the absence of sample memory, sample frequency is a better predictor of comparison choice than the probability of reinforcement for comparison choice.

Authors:  Kelly A DiGan; Thomas R Zentall
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 1.986

6.  A differential-outcomes effect using hedonically nondifferential outcomes with delayed matching to sample by pigeons.

Authors:  Holly C Miller; Andrea M Friedrich; Randi J Narkavic; Thomas R Zentall
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 1.986

Review 7.  Associative concept learning in animals.

Authors:  Thomas R Zentall; Edward A Wasserman; Peter J Urcuioli
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  On the development and mechanics of delayed matching-to-sample performance.

Authors:  Brian D Kangas; Meredith S Berry; Marc N Branch
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  A differential-outcome effect in pigeons using spatial hedonically nondifferential outcomes.

Authors:  Andrea M Friedrich; Thomas R Zentall
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 1.986

10.  The Differential Outcomes Effect in Pigeons (Columba livia): Is It Truly Anticipatory?

Authors:  Marijn Kouwenhoven; Michael Colombo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.