Literature DB >> 16396014

Tactile spatial sensitivity and anisotropy.

Gregory O Gibson1, James C Craig.   

Abstract

A gap detection task was examined for its usefulness as a measure of tactile spatial sensitivity and as a measure of anisotropy. In Experiment 1, sensitivity was measured with a gap detection task both with and without a latex glove at three locations on the hand: the fingerpad, fingerbase, and palm. Results showed that sensitivity varied as a function of location and was correlated with changes in the density of innervation of the primary afferent fibers. In accord with other measures of spatial sensitivity, the glove had a moderate effect on sensitivity in the gap detection task. The results both with and without the glove were more similar to those obtained using another measure of spatial sensitivity, the grating orientation task, than to those obtained using the smooth-grooved task, which is considered an intensive measure. In Experiments 2-4, anisotropy was examined using the gap detection and grating orientation tasks, as well as the smooth-grooved task. Locations on the index finger, palm, and arm were tested. Results indicated that anisotropy was revealed only by tasks that relied on spatial cues. The differences between spatial sensitivity measured in the proximal-distal orientation as compared with the lateral-medial orientation varied by location and were as much as 2.35/1. The results are discussed in terms of what they may reveal about the underlying mechanisms responsible for tactile anisotropy.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16396014     DOI: 10.3758/bf03193632

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  17 in total

1.  The effect of force and conformance on tactile intensive and spatial sensitivity.

Authors:  Gregory O Gibson; James C Craig
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-24       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  SA1 and RA afferent responses to static and vibrating gratings.

Authors:  S J Bensmaïa; J C Craig; T Yoshioka; K O Johnson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-10-19       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Temporal factors in tactile spatial acuity: evidence for RA interference in fine spatial processing.

Authors:  S J Bensmaïa; J C Craig; K O Johnson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-10-19       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Psychophysical Detection of Inclusions with the Bare Finger amidst Softness Differentials.

Authors:  Leigh A Baumgart; Gregory J Gerling; Ellen J Bass
Journal:  Proc Symp Haptic Interface Virtual Env Teleoperator Syst       Date:  2010-04-10

5.  Functional consequences of experience-dependent plasticity on tactile perception following perceptual learning.

Authors:  Natalie K Trzcinski; Manuel Gomez-Ramirez; Steven S Hsiao
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 3.386

6.  Tactile co-activation improves detection of afferent spatial modulation.

Authors:  Gregory O Gibson; Christopher D Makinson; Krish Sathian
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-02-06       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Discriminating smooth from grooved surfaces: effects of random variations in skin penetration.

Authors:  James C Craig; Roger P Rhodes; Gregory O Gibson; Sliman J Bensmaia
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-04-29       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Intact tactile anisotropy despite altered hand perception in complex regional pain syndrome: rethinking the role of the primary sensory cortex in tactile and perceptual dysfunction.

Authors:  Annika Reinersmann; Ian W Skinner; Thomas Lücke; Nicola Massy-Westropp; Henrik Rudolf; G Lorimer Moseley; Tasha R Stanton
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 2.984

9.  Natural Variation in Skin Thickness Argues for Mechanical Stimulus Control by Force Instead of Displacement.

Authors:  Yuxiang Wang; Kara L Marshall; Yoshichika Baba; Ellen A Lumpkin; Gregory J Gerling
Journal:  World Haptics Conf       Date:  2013

10.  Two-point orientation discrimination versus the traditional two-point test for tactile spatial acuity assessment.

Authors:  Jonathan Tong; Oliver Mao; Daniel Goldreich
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.