Literature DB >> 16236778

Temporal factors in tactile spatial acuity: evidence for RA interference in fine spatial processing.

S J Bensmaïa1, J C Craig, K O Johnson.   

Abstract

We investigated the extent to which subjects' ability to perceive the fine spatial structure of a stimulus depends on its temporal properties (namely the frequency at which it vibrates). Subjects were presented with static or vibrating gratings that varied in spatial period (1-8 mm) and vibratory frequency (5-80 Hz) and judged the orientation of the gratings, presented either parallel or perpendicular to the long axis of the finger. We found that the grating orientation threshold (GOT)-the spatial period at which subjects can reliably discriminate the orientation of the grating-increased as the vibratory frequency of the gratings increased. As the spatial modulation of SA1 and RA afferent fibers has been found to be independent of vibratory frequency, the frequency dependence of spatial acuity cannot be attributed to changes in the quality of the peripheral signal. Furthermore, we found GOTs to be relatively independent of stimulus amplitude, so the low spatial acuity at high flutter frequencies does not appear to be due to an inadequacy in the strength of the afferent response at those frequencies. We hypothesized that the RA signal, the strength of which increases with vibratory frequency, interfered with the spatially modulated signal conveyed by SA1 fibers. Consistent with this hypothesis, we found that adapting RA afferent fibers improved spatial acuity, as gauged by GOTs, at the high flutter frequencies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16236778      PMCID: PMC1839044          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00878.2005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  32 in total

1.  Receptive field integration and submodality convergence in the hand area of the post-central gyrus of the alert monkey.

Authors:  J Hyvärinen; A Poranen
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1978-10       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Fingertip skin conformance accounts, in part, for differences in tactile spatial acuity in young subjects, but not for the decline in spatial acuity with aging.

Authors:  Francisco Vega-Bermudez; Kenneth O Johnson
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2004-01

3.  Tactile spatial resolution. II. Neural representation of Bars, edges, and gratings in monkey primary afferents.

Authors:  J R Phillips; K O Johnson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Responses of mechanoreceptive afferent units in the glabrous skin of the human hand to sinusoidal skin displacements.

Authors:  R S Johansson; U Landström; R Lundström
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1982-07-22       Impact factor: 3.252

5.  A model accounting for effects of vibratory amplitude on responses of cutaneous mechanoreceptors in macaque monkey.

Authors:  A W Freeman; K O Johnson
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1982-02       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Cutaneous mechanoreceptors in macaque monkey: temporal discharge patterns evoked by vibration, and a receptor model.

Authors:  A W Freeman; K O Johnson
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1982-02       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Tactile sensibility in the human hand: receptive field characteristics of mechanoreceptive units in the glabrous skin area.

Authors:  R S Johansson
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1978-08       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Tactile spatial resolution. I. Two-point discrimination, gap detection, grating resolution, and letter recognition.

Authors:  K O Johnson; J R Phillips
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Neural mechanisms of spatial tactile discrimination: neural patterns evoked by braille-like dot patterns in the monkey.

Authors:  K O Johnson; G D Lamb
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Tactile acuity is enhanced in blindness.

Authors:  Daniel Goldreich; Ingrid M Kanics
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-04-15       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  17 in total

1.  SA1 and RA afferent responses to static and vibrating gratings.

Authors:  S J Bensmaïa; J C Craig; T Yoshioka; K O Johnson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-10-19       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  A dense array stimulator to generate arbitrary spatio-temporal tactile stimuli.

Authors:  Justin H Killebrew; Sliman J Bensmaïa; John F Dammann; Peter Denchev; Steven S Hsiao; James C Craig; Kenneth O Johnson
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2006-11-28       Impact factor: 2.390

3.  Roughness of simulated surfaces examined with a haptic tool: effects of spatial period, friction, and resistance amplitude.

Authors:  Allan M Smith; Georges Basile; Jonathan Theriault-Groom; Pascal Fortier-Poisson; Gianni Campion; Vincent Hayward
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Tactile orientation perception: an ideal observer analysis of human psychophysical performance in relation to macaque area 3b receptive fields.

Authors:  Ryan M Peters; Phillip Staibano; Daniel Goldreich
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Nociceptive afferent activity alters the SI RA neuron response to mechanical skin stimulation.

Authors:  B L Whitsel; O V Favorov; Y Li; J Lee; P M Quibrera; M Tommerdahl
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2010-03-22       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  Diminutive digits discern delicate details: fingertip size and the sex difference in tactile spatial acuity.

Authors:  Ryan M Peters; Erik Hackeman; Daniel Goldreich
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 7.  Feeling form: the neural basis of haptic shape perception.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Yau; Sung Soo Kim; Pramodsingh H Thakur; Sliman J Bensmaia
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Fast-adapting mechanoreceptors are important for force control in precision grip but not for sensorimotor memory.

Authors:  Susanna B Park; Marco Davare; Marika Falla; William R Kennedy; Mona M Selim; Gwen Wendelschafer-Crabb; Martin Koltzenburg
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-04-06       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Vision is superior to touch in shape perception even with equivalent peripheral input.

Authors:  Yoonju Cho; J C Craig; S S Hsiao; S J Bensmaia
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Convergence of submodality-specific input onto neurons in primary somatosensory cortex.

Authors:  Yu-Cheng Pei; Peter V Denchev; Steven S Hsiao; James C Craig; Sliman J Bensmaia
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-06-17       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.