Literature DB >> 19198816

Tactile co-activation improves detection of afferent spatial modulation.

Gregory O Gibson1, Christopher D Makinson, Krish Sathian.   

Abstract

Tactile co-activation, i.e., synchronous stimulation of a region of skin, has been reported to improve tactile spatial acuity and expand the corresponding somatosensory cortical representation. The current study aimed to clarify the nature of the changes resulting from tactile co-activation, using three measures of tactile sensitivity obtained with controlled mechanical stimulation. One was the grating orientation (GR/OR) discrimination task, where acuity is indexed by the threshold groove width required for 75% correct discrimination between two orthogonal orientations of a grating on the fingerpad. Since this task may be susceptible to intensity cues due to tactile anisotropy, another acuity measure, the 3-dot task, was also used. In this task, the acuity threshold corresponds to 75% correct discrimination of the direction of offset of the central dot in a 3-dot array. In Experiment 1, co-activation failed to induce significant improvement in acuity with either of these measures. Experiment 2 employed both the GR/OR task, and a third measure based on discriminating a grooved from a smooth surface (SM/GV). While the former task demands detailed spatial resolution, the latter requires only that spatial modulation in the afferent population be detected. This experiment also included a control group. GR/OR performance did not significantly improve for either the control or experimental groups. There was, however, a significant improvement in SM/GV performance following co-activation for the experimental but not the control group. These findings indicate that the SM/GV task may be better suited than the GR/OR or 3-dot tasks for measuring changes in tactile sensitivity following co-activation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19198816      PMCID: PMC3563351          DOI: 10.1007/s00221-009-1717-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  26 in total

1.  Shifts in cortical representations predict human discrimination improvement.

Authors:  B Pleger; H R Dinse; P Ragert; P Schwenkreis; J P Malin; M Tegenthoff
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-10-02       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  A correction and a comment on Craig and Lyle (2001).

Authors:  James C Craig; Keith B Lyle
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2002-04

3.  Functional imaging of perceptual learning in human primary and secondary somatosensory cortex.

Authors:  Burkhard Pleger; Ann Freya Foerster; Patrick Ragert; Hubert R Dinse; Peter Schwenkreis; Jean Pierre Malin; Volkmar Nicolas; Martin Tegenthoff
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2003-10-30       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  Behavioral significance of input-dependent plasticity of human somatosensory cortex.

Authors:  Ben Godde; Jens Ehrhardt; Christoph Braun
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2003-03-24       Impact factor: 1.837

5.  Improvement and decline in tactile discrimination behavior after cortical plasticity induced by passive tactile coactivation.

Authors:  Amra Hodzic; Ralf Veit; Ahmed A Karim; Michael Erb; Ben Godde
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-01-14       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Pharmacological modulation of perceptual learning and associated cortical reorganization.

Authors:  Hubert R Dinse; Patrick Ragert; Burkhard Pleger; Peter Schwenkreis; Martin Tegenthoff
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-07-04       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Fingertip skin conformance accounts, in part, for differences in tactile spatial acuity in young subjects, but not for the decline in spatial acuity with aging.

Authors:  Francisco Vega-Bermudez; Kenneth O Johnson
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2004-01

8.  Tactile sensibility in the human hand: relative and absolute densities of four types of mechanoreceptive units in glabrous skin.

Authors:  R S Johansson; A B Vallbo
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Reliability and validity of some handedness questionnaire items.

Authors:  D Raczkowski; J W Kalat; R Nebes
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1974-01       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  Tactile spatial resolution. I. Two-point discrimination, gap detection, grating resolution, and letter recognition.

Authors:  K O Johnson; J R Phillips
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  1 in total

1.  Functional consequences of experience-dependent plasticity on tactile perception following perceptual learning.

Authors:  Natalie K Trzcinski; Manuel Gomez-Ramirez; Steven S Hsiao
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 3.386

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.