Literature DB >> 16307264

The effect of force and conformance on tactile intensive and spatial sensitivity.

Gregory O Gibson1, James C Craig.   

Abstract

The effect of force on intensive and spatial processing was examined with three measures of tactile sensitivity. One of the measures based on intensive cues is the smooth-grooved (SM/GV) task, and the two other measures based on spatial cues are the grating orientation and gap detection tasks. Measures were made at two locations that vary in sensitivity and in the density of innervation of the primary afferent fibers, the right index fingerpad and the palmar surface of the proximal phalanx (fingerbase). At each location, psychometric functions were generated for each of the three measures for two forces (50 and 200 g). The results indicated that increasing force led to marked improvement on the task that relied on intensive cues; however, on the tasks that relied on spatial cues, force had no effect on performance. Biomechanical measures were made of the depth to which the skin invades the grooves of the contactors (conformance) at the two test sites, with the two forces, and with different groove widths. Conformance was found to be a joint function of force and groove width. Further, performance on the SM/GV task could be predicted by the amount of conformance. The psychophysical results are consistent with the view that increasing conformance increases neural activity in the primary afferent fibers, and that this increase in neural activity improves SM/GV performance, but has little effect on the quality of the spatial image.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16307264     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-005-0200-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  26 in total

1.  Grating orientation as a measure of tactile spatial acuity.

Authors:  J C Craig
Journal:  Somatosens Mot Res       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.111

2.  Relative roles of spatial and intensive cues in the discrimination of spatial tactile stimuli.

Authors:  Gregory O Gibson; James C Craig
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2002-10

3.  Deployment of fingertip forces in tactile exploration.

Authors:  Allan M Smith; Geneviève Gosselin; Bryan Houde
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2002-09-20       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Fingertip skin conformance accounts, in part, for differences in tactile spatial acuity in young subjects, but not for the decline in spatial acuity with aging.

Authors:  Francisco Vega-Bermudez; Kenneth O Johnson
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2004-01

5.  Utility of square-wave gratings to assess perioral spatial acuity.

Authors:  J Patel; G K Essick; D G Kelly
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 1.895

6.  Tactile spatial resolution. II. Neural representation of Bars, edges, and gratings in monkey primary afferents.

Authors:  J R Phillips; K O Johnson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  The relationship between skin compliance, age, gender, and tactile discriminative thresholds in humans.

Authors:  K L Woodward
Journal:  Somatosens Mot Res       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.111

8.  Tactile discrimination of shape: responses of rapidly adapting mechanoreceptive afferents to a step stroked across the monkey fingerpad.

Authors:  R H LaMotte; M A Srinivasan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Tactile discrimination of shape: responses of slowly adapting mechanoreceptor afferents to a step stroked across the monkey fingerpad.

Authors:  R H LaMotte; M A Srinivasan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  A psychophysical study of the mechanisms of sensory recovery following nerve injury in humans.

Authors:  R W Van Boven; K O Johnson
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 13.501

View more
  15 in total

1.  SA1 and RA afferent responses to static and vibrating gratings.

Authors:  S J Bensmaïa; J C Craig; T Yoshioka; K O Johnson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-10-19       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Tactile acuity in experienced Tai Chi practitioners: evidence for use dependent plasticity as an effect of sensory-attentional training.

Authors:  Catherine E Kerr; Jessica R Shaw; Rachel H Wasserman; Vanessa W Chen; Alok Kanojia; Thomas Bayer; John M Kelley
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-05-30       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Neural Coding of Contact Events in Somatosensory Cortex.

Authors:  Thierri Callier; Aneesha K Suresh; Sliman J Bensmaia
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 5.357

4.  Tactile orientation perception: an ideal observer analysis of human psychophysical performance in relation to macaque area 3b receptive fields.

Authors:  Ryan M Peters; Phillip Staibano; Daniel Goldreich
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Diminutive digits discern delicate details: fingertip size and the sex difference in tactile spatial acuity.

Authors:  Ryan M Peters; Erik Hackeman; Daniel Goldreich
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  MEMS-based force-clamp analysis of the role of body stiffness in C. elegans touch sensation.

Authors:  Bryan C Petzold; Sung-Jin Park; Eileen A Mazzochette; Miriam B Goodman; Beth L Pruitt
Journal:  Integr Biol (Camb)       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.192

7.  Tactile co-activation improves detection of afferent spatial modulation.

Authors:  Gregory O Gibson; Christopher D Makinson; Krish Sathian
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-02-06       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Discriminating smooth from grooved surfaces: effects of random variations in skin penetration.

Authors:  James C Craig; Roger P Rhodes; Gregory O Gibson; Sliman J Bensmaia
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-04-29       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator (TAPS).

Authors:  Daniel Goldreich; Michael Wong; Ryan M Peters; Ingrid M Kanics
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2009-06-03       Impact factor: 1.355

10.  Two-point orientation discrimination versus the traditional two-point test for tactile spatial acuity assessment.

Authors:  Jonathan Tong; Oliver Mao; Daniel Goldreich
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.