Literature DB >> 21132051

Psychophysical Detection of Inclusions with the Bare Finger amidst Softness Differentials.

Leigh A Baumgart1, Gregory J Gerling, Ellen J Bass.   

Abstract

Softness discrimination and the detection of inclusions are important in surgery and other medical tasks. To better understand how the characteristics of an inclusion (size, depth, hardness) and substrate (stiffness) affect their tactile detection and discrimination with the bare finger, we conducted a psychophysics experiment with eighteen participants. The results indicate that within a more pliant substrate (21 kPa), inclusions of 4 mm diameter (20 mm(3) volume) and greater were consistently detectable (above 75% of the time) but only at a depth of 5 mm. Inclusions embedded in stiffer substrates (82 kPa) had to be twice that volume (5 mm diameter, 40 mm(3) volume) to be detectable at the same rate. To analyze which tactile cues most impact stimulus detectability, we utilized logistic regression and generalized estimating equations. The results indicate that substrate stiffness most contributes to inclusion detectability, while the size, depth, and hardness of the stimulus follow in individual importance, respectively. The results seek to aid in the development of clinical tools and information displays and more accurate virtual haptic environments in discrimination of soft tissue.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 21132051      PMCID: PMC2995217          DOI: 10.1109/HAPTIC.2010.5444684

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Symp Haptic Interface Virtual Env Teleoperator Syst        ISSN: 1551-5435


  13 in total

1.  Neural coding mechanisms underlying perceived roughness of finely textured surfaces.

Authors:  T Yoshioka; B Gibb; A K Dorsch; S S Hsiao; K O Johnson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-09-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Feeling textures through a probe: effects of probe and surface geometry and exploratory factors.

Authors:  Roberta L Klatzky; Susan J Lederman; Cheryl Hamilton; Molly Grindley; Robert H Swendsen
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2003-05

Review 3.  Haptic identification of common objects: effects of constraining the manual exploration process.

Authors:  Susan J Lederman; Roberta L Klatzky
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2004-05

4.  Tactile spatial sensitivity and anisotropy.

Authors:  Gregory O Gibson; James C Craig
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2005-08

5.  Longitudinal data analysis for discrete and continuous outcomes.

Authors:  S L Zeger; K Y Liang
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Physicians' abilities to detect lumps in silicone breast models.

Authors:  S W Fletcher; M S O'Malley; L A Bunce
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1985-04-19       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Tactile discrimination of edge shape: limits on spatial resolution imposed by parameters of the peripheral neural population.

Authors:  H E Wheat; A W Goodwin
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-10-01       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Magnitude estimation of softness.

Authors:  Robert M Friedman; Kim D Hester; Barry G Green; Robert H LaMotte
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Tactual discrimination of softness.

Authors:  M A Srinivasan; R H LaMotte
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 10.  Human tactile perception as a standard for artificial tactile sensing--a review.

Authors:  J Dargahi; S Najarian
Journal:  Int J Med Robot       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.547

View more
  1 in total

1.  Neural coding of passive lump detection in compliant artificial tissue.

Authors:  James C Gwilliam; Takashi Yoshioka; Allison M Okamura; Steven S Hsiao
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 2.714

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.