Literature DB >> 16377689

Induction and inhibition of ciprofloxacin resistance-conferring mutations in hypermutator bacteria.

Ryan T Cirz1, Floyd E Romesberg.   

Abstract

The emergence of drug-resistant bacteria poses a serious threat to human health. Bacteria often acquire resistance from a mutation of chromosomal genes during therapy. We have recently shown that the evolution of resistance to ciprofloxacin in vivo and in vitro requires the induction of a mutation that is mediated by the cleavage of the SOS repressor LexA and the associated derepression of three specialized DNA polymerases (polymerase II [Pol II], Pol IV, and Pol V). These results led us to suggest that it may be possible to design drugs to inhibit these proteins and that such drugs might be coadministered with antibiotics to prevent mutation and the evolution of resistance. For the approach to be feasible, there must not be any mechanisms through which bacteria can induce mutations and acquire antibiotic resistance that are independent of LexA and its repressed polymerases. Perhaps the most commonly cited mechanism to elevate bacterial mutation rates is the inactivation of methyl-directed mismatch repair (MMR). However, it is unclear whether this represents a LexA-independent mechanism or if the mutations that arise in MMR-deficient hypermutator strains are also dependent on LexA cleavage and polymerase derepression. In this work, we show that LexA cleavage and polymerase derepression are required for the evolution of clinically significant resistance in MMR-defective Escherichia coli. Thus, drugs that inhibit the proteins responsible for induced mutations are expected to efficiently prevent the evolution of resistance, even in MMR-deficient hypermutator strains.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16377689      PMCID: PMC1346780          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.50.1.220-225.2006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  43 in total

1.  Mutator bacteria as a risk factor in treatment of infectious diseases.

Authors:  Antoine Giraud; Ivan Matic; Miroslav Radman; Michel Fons; François Taddei
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 2.  Biochemistry and genetics of eukaryotic mismatch repair.

Authors:  R Kolodner
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1996-06-15       Impact factor: 11.361

Review 3.  Evolution and dissemination of beta-lactamases accelerated by generations of beta-lactam antibiotics.

Authors:  A A Medeiros
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 9.079

4.  The complete genome sequence of Escherichia coli K-12.

Authors:  F R Blattner; G Plunkett; C A Bloch; N T Perna; V Burland; M Riley; J Collado-Vides; J D Glasner; C K Rode; G F Mayhew; J Gregor; N W Davis; H A Kirkpatrick; M A Goeden; D J Rose; B Mau; Y Shao
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-09-05       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  The distribution of the numbers of mutants in bacterial populations.

Authors:  D E LEA; C A COULSON
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  1949-12       Impact factor: 1.166

6.  Evolution of high mutation rates in experimental populations of E. coli.

Authors:  P D Sniegowski; P J Gerrish; R E Lenski
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-06-12       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 7.  Mismatch repair, genetic stability, and cancer.

Authors:  P Modrich
Journal:  Science       Date:  1994-12-23       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  UmuD'(2)C is an error-prone DNA polymerase, Escherichia coli pol V.

Authors:  M Tang; X Shen; E G Frank; M O'Donnell; R Woodgate; M F Goodman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-08-03       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Contribution of the mismatch DNA repair system to the generation of stationary-phase-induced mutants of Bacillus subtilis.

Authors:  Mario Pedraza-Reyes; Ronald E Yasbin
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.490

10.  Isolation and characterization of two Saccharomyces cerevisiae genes encoding homologs of the bacterial HexA and MutS mismatch repair proteins.

Authors:  R A Reenan; R D Kolodner
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 4.562

View more
  37 in total

1.  The SOS Response Mediates Sustained Colonization of the Mammalian Gut.

Authors:  Amanda N Samuels; Manuela Roggiani; Jun Zhu; Mark Goulian; Rahul M Kohli
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 3.441

Review 2.  SOS response and its regulation on the fluoroquinolone resistance.

Authors:  Ting-Ting Qin; Hai-Quan Kang; Ping Ma; Peng-Peng Li; Lin-Yan Huang; Bing Gu
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2015-12

3.  An editing-defective aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase is mutagenic in aging bacteria via the SOS response.

Authors:  Jamie M Bacher; Paul Schimmel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-01-30       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  SOS regulation of qnrB expression.

Authors:  Minghua Wang; George A Jacoby; Debra M Mills; David C Hooper
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2008-11-24       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 5.  Development of tRNA synthetases and connection to genetic code and disease.

Authors:  Paul Schimmel
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2008-09-02       Impact factor: 6.725

6.  Effects of subinhibitory concentrations of antibiotics on SOS and DNA repair gene expression in Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Lili Rosana Mesak; Vivian Miao; Julian Davies
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2008-06-30       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  An SOS-regulated type 2 toxin-antitoxin system.

Authors:  Larissa A Singletary; Janet L Gibson; Elizabeth J Tanner; Gregory J McKenzie; Peter L Lee; Caleb Gonzalez; Susan M Rosenberg
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2009-10-16       Impact factor: 3.490

8.  Defining the Pseudomonas aeruginosa SOS response and its role in the global response to the antibiotic ciprofloxacin.

Authors:  Ryan T Cirz; Bryan M O'Neill; Jennifer A Hammond; Steven R Head; Floyd E Romesberg
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.490

9.  Selection of dinB alleles suppressing survival loss upon dinB overexpression in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Ryan W Benson; Tiziana M Cafarelli; Thomas J Rands; Ida Lin; Veronica G Godoy
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2014-06-09       Impact factor: 3.490

10.  Bacterial stationary-state mutagenesis and Mammalian tumorigenesis as stress-induced cellular adaptations and the role of epigenetics.

Authors:  Tv Karpinets; Dj Greenwood; Ip Pogribny; Nf Samatova
Journal:  Curr Genomics       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.236

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.