Literature DB >> 16362474

Vascular pedicle ligation techniques during laparoscopic colectomy. A prospective randomized trial.

P W Marcello1, P L Roberts, L C Rusin, R Holubkov, D J Schoetz.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A variety of devices are available for pedicle ligation during laparoscopic colectomy including vascular staplers, clips, and electrothermal bipolar vessel-sealing devices. This study assesses their speed, reliability, and cost to guide surgeons in their choice for intracorporeal pedicle ligation.
METHODS: A prospective randomized study comparing laparoscopic vascular staplers and disposable clip appliers (S/C) with the LigaSure Atlas (LIG) was performed during elective right, left, and total colectomy. Cases were stratified by procedure. Failure was defined as any bleeding after proper pedicle ligation.
RESULTS: The study included 48 S/C patients and 52 LIG patients with no differences in demographics, diagnosis, procedure, number of vessels ligated per procedure, or operative time. Failure occurred for 14 (9.2%) of the 152 vessels ligated in the S/C group, as compared with 5 (3%) of the 169 vessels ligated in the LIG group (p = 0.02). The median blood loss associated with device failure was 50 ml (range, 20-50 ml) in S/C group, as compared with 100 ml (range 25-800 ml) in the LIG group (p = 0.054). Major blood loss attributable to device failure and surgeon error occurred in only one LIG case. The mean cost per case of vessel ligation was significantly less in the LIG group (317 dollars +/- 0 dollars vs 400 dollars +/- 112 dollars; p < 0.001). The cost differences were greatest for total colectomy (LIG = 317 dollars +/- 0 dollars vs S/C = 565 dollars +/- 67 dollars; p = 0.002).
CONCLUSION: Device failure, although more common in the S/C group, does not result in significant blood loss. The LigaSure Atlas is more cost effective during laparoscopic colectomy, especially total colectomy, and may allow the surgeon more versatility in its application.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16362474     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-005-0258-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  12 in total

1.  Effectiveness of the ultrasonic coagulating shears, LigaSure vessel sealer, and surgical clip application in biliary surgery: a comparative analysis.

Authors:  B D Matthews; B L Pratt; C L Backus; K W Kercher; G Mostafa; A Lentzner; E H Lipford; R F Sing; B T Heniford
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 0.688

2.  Clipless hand-assisted laparoscopic total colectomy using Ligasure Atlas.

Authors:  Yasumi Araki; Toshihiro Noake; Masamitsu Kanazawa; Katsuhiro Yamada; Kazuya Momosaki; Yasuhiro Nozoe; Akemi Inoue; Nobuya Ishibashi; Yutaka Ogata; Kazuo Shirouzu
Journal:  Kurume Med J       Date:  2004

3.  Surgical stapler-associated fatalities and adverse events reported to the Food and Drug Administration.

Authors:  S Lori Brown; Eileen K Woo
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 6.113

4.  The learning curve for laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Preliminary results from a prospective analysis of 1194 laparoscopic-assisted colectomies.

Authors:  C L Bennett; S J Stryker; M R Ferreira; J Adams; R W Beart
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1997-01

5.  Hand-assisted laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy: helping hand or hindrance?

Authors:  Y-J Chang; P W Marcello; L C Rusin; P L Roberts; D J Schoetz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-03-23       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Complications of laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Analysis and comparison of early vs. latter experience.

Authors:  S W Larach; S K Patankar; A Ferrara; P R Williamson; S E Perozo; A S Lord
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 4.585

7.  Comparative study of electrothermal bipolar vessel sealer and ultrasonic coagulating shears in laparoscopic colectomy.

Authors:  M Takada; T Ichihara; Y Kuroda
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-12-02       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Benefits of hand-assisted laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy: a comparative study.

Authors:  David E Rivadeneira; Peter W Marcello; Patricia L Roberts; Lawrence C Rusin; John J Murray; John A Coller; David J Schoetz
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.585

9.  Randomized trial of suture versus electrosurgical bipolar vessel sealing in vaginal hysterectomy.

Authors:  Barbara Levy; Laura Emery
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 7.661

10.  Does conversion of a laparoscopic colectomy adversely affect patient outcome?

Authors:  Sergio Casillas; Conor P Delaney; Anthony J Senagore; Karen Brady; Victor W Fazio
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.585

View more
  19 in total

1.  Electrothermal bipolar vessel ligation improves operative time during laparoscopic total proctocolectomy: a large single-center experience.

Authors:  Richard Garfinkle; Marylise Boutros; Neha Hippalgaonkar; Geva Maimon; Giovanna da Silva; Fabio Potenti; Steven D Wexner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Energy vessel sealing systems versus mechanical ligature of the inferior mesenteric artery in laparoscopic sigmoidectomy.

Authors:  Bertrand Trilling; Romain Riboud; Julio Abba; Edouard Girard; Jean-Luc Faucheron
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Vascular relationships in right colectomy for cancer: clinical implications.

Authors:  D Ignjatovic; S Sund; B Stimec; R Bergamaschi
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2007-08-03       Impact factor: 3.781

4.  Prospective analysis of the sealing ability of the ENSEAL® G2 Articulating Tissue Sealer and transector on human mesenteric vessels in colorectal surgery.

Authors:  B Balachandran; G Melich; T Mustafa; S J Marecik; L M Prasad; M Gonzalez; S Sulo; F Dabbous; J J Park
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 3.781

5.  Comparison of four energy-based vascular sealing and cutting instruments: A porcine model.

Authors:  Benjamin Person; David A Vivas; Dan Ruiz; Michael Talcott; James E Coad; Steven D Wexner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-12-20       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Use of an electrothermal bipolar sealing device in ligation of major mesenteric vessels during laparoscopic colorectal resection.

Authors:  S T Martin; A Heeney; C Pierce; P R O'Connell; J M Hyland; Desmond C Winter
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2011-07-15       Impact factor: 3.781

7.  Safety and efficacy of an electrothermal bipolar vessel sealing device in sealing and division of the inferior mesenteric vessels in minimally invasive colorectal surgery.

Authors:  A Pai; J Sugrue; S Bibi; G Melich; S Marecik; L M Prasad; J Park
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 3.781

8.  Role of CT angiography with three-dimensional reconstruction of mesenteric vessels in laparoscopic colorectal resections: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Francesco Saverio Mari; Giuseppe Nigri; Alessandra Pancaldi; Carlo Nicola De Cecco; Marcello Gasparrini; Anna Dall'Oglio; Fioralba Pindozzi; Andrea Laghi; Antonio Brescia
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-01-05       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Efficacy and Safety of Combined Ultrasonic and Bipolar Energy Source in Laparoscopic Surgery.

Authors:  Daniel C Steinemann; Sebastian H Lamm; Andreas Zerz
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 3.452

10.  Electrothermal bipolar vessel sealing device vs. ultrasonic coagulating shears in laparoscopic colectomies: a comparative study.

Authors:  Roberto Campagnacci; Angelo de Sanctis; Maddalena Baldarelli; Massimiliano Rimini; Giovanni Lezoche; Mario Guerrieri
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-02-08       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.