Literature DB >> 11565773

Effectiveness of the ultrasonic coagulating shears, LigaSure vessel sealer, and surgical clip application in biliary surgery: a comparative analysis.

B D Matthews1, B L Pratt, C L Backus, K W Kercher, G Mostafa, A Lentzner, E H Lipford, R F Sing, B T Heniford.   

Abstract

Advancements in laparoscopic surgery are often dictated by the limitations of technical instrumentation. Energy sources other than electrosurgery have become popular with the promise of quick and effective vascular control. With their success surgeons have begun using these on structures other than blood vessels with little or no data establishing their efficacy or safety. This study evaluates alternative energy sources in sealing ductal structures for possible use in liver or gallbladder surgery. After elective cholecystectomy cystic ducts (n = 45) were resealed ex vivo with surgical clips (n = 14), ultrasonic coagulating shears (n = 16), or electrothermal bipolar vessel sealer (n = 15), and bursting pressures were measured. Nineteen additional human cystic ducts were randomized to seal by ultrasonic coagulating shears (n = 9) or electrothermal bipolar vessel sealer (n = 10) and fixed in 10 per cent buffered formalin for histologic evaluation of thermal spread (mm). After this nine adult pigs were randomized to laparoscopic ligation and transection of the common bile duct using surgical clips (n = 3), ultrasonic coagulating shears (n = 3), or electrothermal bipolar vessel sealer (n = 3). The animals underwent necropsy for assessment of seal integrity on the sixth postoperative day. In the ex vivo study the mean cystic duct bursting pressure was 621 mm Hg with surgical clips and 482 mm Hg with the electrothermal bipolar vessel sealer (P = 0.39). The mean cystic duct bursting pressure after ultrasonic coagulating shears was 278 mm Hg, which was statistically less than surgical clips (P = 0.007) and electrothermal bipolar vessel sealer (P = 0.02). The mean thermal spread was 3.5 mm for ultrasonic coagulating shears and 13.4 mm for electrothermal bipolar vessel sealer (P = 0.0002). All animals undergoing ligation and transection of the common bile duct with ultrasonic coagulating shears and electrothermal bipolar vessel sealer developed bile peritonitis by postoperative day 6 as a result of seal leak. All animals undergoing surgical clip ligation and transection of the common bile duct maintained seal integrity. The mean common bile duct pressure above the surgical clip was 12 mm Hg (range 10-14). In conclusion the acute ex vivo study demonstrated a significant difference in the cystic duct bursting pressure between surgical clips and ultrasonic coagulating shears and between electrothermal bipolar vessel sealer and ultrasonic coagulating shears. The ultrasonic coagulating shears and electrothermal bipolar vessel sealer failed to maintain seal integrity in the in vivo animal study. Given the failure of the ultrasonic coagulating shears and electrothermal bipolar vessel sealer in the animal model these energy sources should not be used for transection of the cystic duct or major hepatic ducts during hepatobiliary surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11565773

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Surg        ISSN: 0003-1348            Impact factor:   0.688


  26 in total

1.  BiClamp forceps significantly shorten the operation time for breast surgery.

Authors:  Hideki Takeuchi; Toshiaki Saeki; Takashi Shigekawa; Hiroshi Sano; Noriko Nakamiya; Kazuo Matsuura; Misono Misumi; Takao Takahashi; Nobuko Fujiuchi; Katsuhiko Okubo; Akihiko Osaki; Takaki Sakurai; Isamu Koyama
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2010-07-30       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  An evaluation of electrosurgical vessel-sealing devices in biliary tract surgery in a porcine model.

Authors:  William W Hope; Srikanth Padma; William L Newcomb; Thomas M Schmelzer; Jessica J Heath; Amy E Lincourt; B Todd Heniford; H James Norton; John B Martinie; David A Iannitti
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.647

3.  Vascular pedicle ligation techniques during laparoscopic colectomy. A prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  P W Marcello; P L Roberts; L C Rusin; R Holubkov; D J Schoetz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-12-09       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Could bipolar vessel sealers prevent bile leaks after hepatectomy?

Authors:  Serge Evrard; Yves Bécouarn; René Brunet; Marianne Fonck; Caroline Larrue; Simone Mathoulin-Pélissier
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2006-11-28       Impact factor: 3.445

5.  Sutureless and stapleless laparoscopic splenectomy using radiofrequency: LigaSure device.

Authors:  R Gelmini; F Romano; N Quaranta; R Caprotti; G Tazzioli; G Colombo; M Saviano; F Uggeri
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-05-11       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  A prospective randomized comparison of two instruments for dissection and vessel sealing in laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Authors:  M Hübner; D Hahnloser; F Hetzer; M K Müller; P-A Clavien; N Demartines
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-02-06       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Comparison of monopolar electrocoagulation, bipolar electrocoagulation, Ultracision, and Ligasure.

Authors:  Theodore Diamantis; Michael Kontos; Antonios Arvelakis; Spiridon Syroukis; Dimitris Koronarchis; Apostolos Papalois; Emmanuel Agapitos; Elias Bastounis; Andreas C Lazaris
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.549

8.  Comparison of four energy-based vascular sealing and cutting instruments: A porcine model.

Authors:  Benjamin Person; David A Vivas; Dan Ruiz; Michael Talcott; James E Coad; Steven D Wexner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-12-20       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Current techniques of liver transection.

Authors:  Ronnie T P Poon
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.647

10.  Radiofrequency vessel-sealing system versus the clamp-crushing technique in liver transection: results of a prospective randomized study on 100 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Andrea Muratore; Alfredo Mellano; Giuseppe Tarantino; Patrizia Marsanic; Michele De Simone; Fabrizio Di Benedetto
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 3.647

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.