Literature DB >> 15540299

Does conversion of a laparoscopic colectomy adversely affect patient outcome?

Sergio Casillas1, Conor P Delaney, Anthony J Senagore, Karen Brady, Victor W Fazio.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Conversion during laparoscopic colectomy varies in frequency according to the surgeon's experience and case selection. However, there remains concern that conversion is associated with increased morbidity and higher hospital costs.
METHODS: From January 1999 to August 2002, 430 laparoscopic colectomies were performed by two surgeons, with 51 (12 percent) cases converted to open surgery. Converted cases were matched for operation and age to 51 open cases performed mostly by other colorectal surgeons from our department. Data collected included gender, American Society of Anesthesiology score, operative indication, resection type, operative stage at conversion, in-hospital complications, direct hospital costs, unexpected readmission within 30 days, and mortality.
RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the groups for age (converted, 55 +/- 19; open, 62 +/- 16), male:female ratio (converted, 17:34; open, 23:28), or American Society of Anesthesiology score distribution. Indications for surgery were neoplasia (converted, 16; open, 31); diverticular disease (converted, 21; open, 13); Crohn's disease (converted, 12; open, 5); and other disease (converted, 2; open, 2). Operative times were similar (converted, 150 + 56 minutes; open, 132 +/- 48 minutes). Conversions occurred before defining the major vascular pedicle/ureter (50 percent), in relation to intracorporeal vascular ligation (15 percent), or during bowel transection or presacral dissection (35 percent). Specific indications for conversion were technical (41 percent), followed by adhesions (33 percent), phlegmon or abscess (23 percent), bleeding (6 percent), and failure to identify the ureter (6 percent). Median hospital stay was five days for both groups. In-hospital complications (converted 11.6 percent; open 8 percent), 30-day readmission rate (converted 13 percent vs. open 8 percent), and direct costs were similar between groups. There were no mortalities.
CONCLUSION: Conversion of a laparoscopic colectomy does not result in inappropriately prolonged operative times, increased morbidity or length of stay, increased direct costs, or unexpected readmissions compared with similarly complex laparotomies. A policy of commencing most cases suitable for a laparoscopic approach laparoscopically offers patients the benefits of a laparoscopic colectomy without adversely affecting perioperative risks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15540299     DOI: 10.1007/s10350-004-0692-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  42 in total

1.  Curative colectomy via minilaparotomy approach without utilizing specific instruments.

Authors:  H Ishida; T Ishiguro; T Ohsawa; N Okada; M Yokoyama; K Kumamoto; K Ishibashi; N Haga
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 3.781

2.  Single-incision versus hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy: a case-matched series.

Authors:  Dhruvil P Gandhi; Madhu Ragupathi; Chirag B Patel; Diego I Ramos-Valadez; T Bartley Pickron; Eric M Haas
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Vascular pedicle ligation techniques during laparoscopic colectomy. A prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  P W Marcello; P L Roberts; L C Rusin; R Holubkov; D J Schoetz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-12-09       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Impact of laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer on operative outcomes and survival.

Authors:  Wai Lun Law; Yee Man Lee; Hok Kwok Choi; Chi Leung Seto; Judy Wc Ho
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Considerations on the learning curve for laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a view from the bottom.

Authors:  S Leong; R A Cahill; B J Mehigan; R B Stephens
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2007-04-03       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Laparoscopic colectomy in the obese, morbidly obese, and super morbidly obese: when does weight matter?

Authors:  Bradley J Champagne; Madhuri Nishtala; Justin T Brady; Benjamin P Crawshaw; Morris E Franklin; Conor P Delaney; Scott R Steele
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  A standardized technique for laparoscopic rectal resection.

Authors:  Rolv-Ole Lindsetmo; Conor P Delaney
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-09-12       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Laparoscopic vs open colectomy for colon cancer: results from a large nationwide population-based analysis.

Authors:  Scott R Steele; Tommy A Brown; Robert M Rush; Matthew J Martin
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2007-09-07       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Impact of prior abdominal surgery on curative resection of colon cancer via minilaparotomy.

Authors:  Hideyuki Ishida; Tohru Ishiguro; Keiichiro Ishibashi; Tomonori Ohsawa; Kouki Kuwabara; Norimichi Okada; Tatsuya Miyazaki
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 2.549

10.  Complications in colorectal surgery: risk factors and preventive strategies.

Authors:  Philipp Kirchhoff; Pierre-Alain Clavien; Dieter Hahnloser
Journal:  Patient Saf Surg       Date:  2010-03-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.