Literature DB >> 9152190

Complications of laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Analysis and comparison of early vs. latter experience.

S W Larach1, S K Patankar, A Ferrara, P R Williamson, S E Perozo, A S Lord.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to test if the techniques learned during our early learning experience have proved to be effective in reducing the complications specifically related to the laparoscopic technique of colorectal surgery.
METHODS: From October 1991 until July 1996, 195 laparoscopic operations were performed on the colon and the rectum. These data were divided into "early" and "latter" groups. The conversion reasons and early and late postoperative complications were analyzed and compared.
RESULTS: Incidence of conversions required because of iatrogenic injuries showed a decline from 7.3 percent in the early group to 1.4 percent in the latter group. Sixty-six postoperative complications were observed in 59 (30.3 percent) patients. Complications specifically related to the technique of laparoscopic surgery occurred in nine (4.6 percent) patients. These were postoperative bleeding in three patients, port site hernias in five patients, and left ureteric stricture in one patient. Eight (6.5 percent) of these complications occurred in the early group, whereas one (1.4 percent) occurred in the latter group. Analyzing the conversions caused by intraoperative iatrogenic injuries and the specific postoperative complications together reveals that the incidence of 13.8 percent (17/123) in the early group has been reduced significantly to 2.8 percent (2/72) in the latter group.
CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of our experience, we have identified techniques, which are discussed in detail, to make laparoscopic colorectal surgery safe. Strict adherence to these techniques has significantly reduced the incidence of complications, specifically those related to the laparoscopic technique.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9152190     DOI: 10.1007/bf02055385

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  38 in total

1.  Converted laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Authors:  P Gervaz; A Pikarsky; M Utech; M Secic; J Efron; B Belin; A Jain; S Wexner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-05-11       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Subcutaneous metastasis at a surgical drain site after the resection of pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Shawn D St Peter; Cuong C Nguyen; David C Mulligan; Adyr A Moss
Journal:  Int J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2003

3.  Vascular pedicle ligation techniques during laparoscopic colectomy. A prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  P W Marcello; P L Roberts; L C Rusin; R Holubkov; D J Schoetz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-12-09       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Three-dimensional computed tomography in laparoscopic surgery for colorectal carcinoma.

Authors:  Hiroshi Ohtani; Kohei Ohta; Yuichi Arimoto; Eui-Chul Kim; Hiroko Oba; Kenji Adachi; Shoichi Terakawa; Mitsuo Tsubakimoto
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-11-28       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: clinical practice guidelines of the Italian Society of Colo-Rectal Surgery.

Authors:  C A Sartori; A D'Annibale; G Cutini; C Senargiotto; D D'Antonio; A Dal Pozzo; M Fiorino; G Gagliardi; B Franzato; G Romano
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2007-05-25       Impact factor: 3.781

6.  Intraoperative fluoroscopy vs. intraoperative laparoscopic ultrasonography for early colorectal cancer localization in laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Koichi Nagata; Shungo Endo; Kishiko Tatsukawa; Shin-ei Kudo
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-05-24       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Impact of a full-time preceptor on the institutional outcome of laparoscopic colectomy.

Authors:  Alessio Pigazzi; Casandra Anderson; Pablo Mojica-Manosa; David Smith; Kathrina Hernandez; I Benjamin Paz; Joshua D I Ellenhorn
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 8.  What is a meant when a laparoscopic surgical procedure is described as "safe"?

Authors:  D Weizman; J Cyriac; D R Urbach
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-02-08       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 9.  Trocar site recurrence in laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  O Zmora; P Gervaz; S D Wexner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-06-12       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Does a laparoscopic approach affect the number of lymph nodes harvested during curative surgery for colorectal cancer?

Authors:  Galal El-Gazzaz; Tracy Hull; Jeffery Hammel; Daniel Geisler
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-06-11       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.