Literature DB >> 16334696

The interaction of glottal-pulse rate and vocal-tract length in judgements of speaker size, sex, and age.

David R R Smith1, Roy D Patterson.   

Abstract

Glottal-pulse rate (GPR) and vocal-tract length (VTL) are related to the size, sex, and age of the speaker but it is not clear how the two factors combine to influence our perception of speaker size, sex, and age. This paper describes experiments designed to measure the effect of the interaction of GPR and VTL upon judgements of speaker size, sex, and age. Vowels were scaled to represent people with a wide range of GPRs and VTLs, including many well beyond the normal range of the population, and listeners were asked to judge the size and sex/age of the speaker. The judgements of speaker size show that VTL has a strong influence upon perceived speaker size. The results for the sex and age categorization (man, woman, boy, or girl) show that, for vowels with GPR and VTL values in the normal range, judgements of speaker sex and age are influenced about equally by GPR and VTL. For vowels with abnormal combinations of low GPRs and short VTLs, the VTL information appears to decide the sex/age judgement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16334696      PMCID: PMC2346770          DOI: 10.1121/1.2047107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  25 in total

1.  Speaker sex identification from voiced, whispered, and filtered isolated vowels.

Authors:  N J Lass; K R Hughes; M D Bowyer; L T Waters; V T Bourne
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Gender recognition from speech. Part I: Coarse analysis.

Authors:  K Wu; D G Childers
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  An investigation of speaker height and weight identification.

Authors:  N J Lass; M Davis
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  The evolution of speech: a comparative review.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 20.229

5.  Identification of speaker sex from isolated, voiceless fricatives.

Authors:  M F Schwartz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1968-05       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Men's voices and women's choices.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.844

7.  Vocal tract length and formant frequency dispersion correlate with body size in rhesus macaques.

Authors:  W T Fitch
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Sex differences in the acoustic structure of vowel-like grunt vocalizations in baboons and their perceptual discrimination by baboon listeners.

Authors:  Drew Rendall; Michael J Owren; Elise Weerts; Robert D Hienz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Androgen stimulation and laryngeal development.

Authors:  N S Beckford; S R Rood; D Schaid; B Schanbacher
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1985 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.547

10.  The processing and perception of size information in speech sounds.

Authors:  David R R Smith; Roy D Patterson; Richard Turner; Hideki Kawahara; Toshio Irino
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  54 in total

1.  Do irrelevant sounds impair the maintenance of all characteristics of speech in memory?

Authors:  D Gabriel; E Gaudrain; G Lebrun-Guillaud; F Sheppard; I M Tomescu; A Schnider
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2012-12

2.  Location and acoustic scale cues in concurrent speech recognition.

Authors:  D Timothy Ives; Martin D Vestergaard; Doris J Kistler; Roy D Patterson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Identification of speaker sex from one vowel across a range of fundamental frequencies.

Authors:  Douglas N Honorof; D H Whalen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Executive control of spatial attention shifts in the auditory compared to the visual modality.

Authors:  Katrin Krumbholz; Esther A Nobis; Robert J Weatheritt; Gereon R Fink
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Masking Release for Speech-in-Speech Recognition Due to a Target/Masker Sex Mismatch in Children With Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Lori J Leibold; Jenna M Browning; Emily Buss
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Perceptual susceptibility to acoustic manipulations in speaker discrimination.

Authors:  Gregory Sell; Clara Suied; Mounya Elhilali; Shihab Shamma
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Voice gender and the segregation of competing talkers: Perceptual learning in cochlear implant simulations.

Authors:  Jessica R Sullivan; Peter F Assmann; Shaikat Hossain; Erin C Schafer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Gender categorization is abnormal in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Christina D Fuller; Etienne Gaudrain; Jeanne N Clarke; John J Galvin; Qian-Jie Fu; Rolien H Free; Deniz Başkent
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-08-30

9.  Musician effect in cochlear implant simulated gender categorization.

Authors:  Christina D Fuller; John J Galvin; Rolien H Free; Deniz Başkent
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Zebra finches exhibit speaker-independent phonetic perception of human speech.

Authors:  Verena R Ohms; Arike Gill; Caroline A A Van Heijningen; Gabriel J L Beckers; Carel ten Cate
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.