Literature DB >> 19955157

Zebra finches exhibit speaker-independent phonetic perception of human speech.

Verena R Ohms1, Arike Gill, Caroline A A Van Heijningen, Gabriel J L Beckers, Carel ten Cate.   

Abstract

Humans readily distinguish spoken words that closely resemble each other in acoustic structure, irrespective of audible differences between individual voices or sex of the speakers. There is an ongoing debate about whether the ability to form phonetic categories that underlie such distinctions indicates the presence of uniquely evolved, speech-linked perceptual abilities, or is based on more general ones shared with other species. We demonstrate that zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata) can discriminate and categorize monosyllabic words that differ in their vowel and transfer this categorization to the same words spoken by novel speakers independent of the sex of the voices. Our analysis indicates that the birds, like humans, use intrinsic and extrinsic speaker normalization to make the categorization. This finding shows that there is no need to invoke special mechanisms, evolved together with language, to explain this feature of speech perception.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19955157      PMCID: PMC2842761          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2009.1788

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  28 in total

Review 1.  Speech perception.

Authors:  Randy L Diehl; Andrew J Lotto; Lori L Holt
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 24.137

2.  Recursive syntactic pattern learning by songbirds.

Authors:  Timothy Q Gentner; Kimberly M Fenn; Daniel Margoliash; Howard C Nusbaum
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-04-27       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  The evolution of speech: a comparative review.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 20.229

4.  Some effects of talker variability on spoken word recognition.

Authors:  J W Mullennix; D B Pisoni; C S Martin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 5.  Perception of the speech code.

Authors:  A M Liberman; F S Cooper; D P Shankweiler; M Studdert-Kennedy
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1967-11       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  The motor theory of speech perception revised.

Authors:  A M Liberman; I G Mattingly
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1985-10

7.  Men's voices and women's choices.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.844

8.  The faculty of language: what's special about it?

Authors:  Steven Pinker; Ray Jackendoff
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2005-03

9.  Japanese quail can learn phonetic categories.

Authors:  K R Kluender; R L Diehl; P R Killeen
Journal:  Science       Date:  1987-09-04       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Speech perception by budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus): spoken vowels.

Authors:  R J Dooling; S D Brown
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1990-06
View more
  20 in total

1.  Vocal tract articulation revisited: the case of the monk parakeet.

Authors:  Verena R Ohms; Gabriël J L Beckers; Carel ten Cate; Roderick A Suthers
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2012-01-01       Impact factor: 3.312

2.  Acoustic and perceptual categories of vocal elements in the warble song of budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus).

Authors:  Hsiao-Wei Tu; Edward W Smith; Robert J Dooling
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 2.231

Review 3.  Revisiting the syntactic abilities of non-human animals: natural vocalizations and artificial grammar learning.

Authors:  Carel ten Cate; Kazuo Okanoya
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Zebra finches are sensitive to prosodic features of human speech.

Authors:  Michelle J Spierings; Carel ten Cate
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 5.  Evo-devo, deep homology and FoxP2: implications for the evolution of speech and language.

Authors:  Constance Scharff; Jana Petri
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Dogs perceive and spontaneously normalize formant-related speaker and vowel differences in human speech sounds.

Authors:  Holly Root-Gutteridge; Victoria F Ratcliffe; Anna T Korzeniowska; David Reby
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 3.703

7.  The role of spectral cues in timbre discrimination by ferrets and humans.

Authors:  Stephen M Town; Huriye Atilgan; Katherine C Wood; Jennifer K Bizley
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Do zebra finch parents fail to recognise their own offspring?

Authors:  Hendrik Reers; Alain Jacot; Wolfgang Forstmeier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Zebra finches and Dutch adults exhibit the same cue weighting bias in vowel perception.

Authors:  Verena R Ohms; Paola Escudero; Karin Lammers; Carel ten Cate
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2011-07-15       Impact factor: 3.084

10.  Visualizing sound emission of elephant vocalizations: evidence for two rumble production types.

Authors:  Angela S Stoeger; Gunnar Heilmann; Matthias Zeppelzauer; André Ganswindt; Sean Hensman; Benjamin D Charlton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.