Literature DB >> 20550271

Location and acoustic scale cues in concurrent speech recognition.

D Timothy Ives1, Martin D Vestergaard, Doris J Kistler, Roy D Patterson.   

Abstract

Location and acoustic scale cues have both been shown to have an effect on the recognition of speech in multi-speaker environments. This study examines the interaction of these variables. Subjects were presented with concurrent triplets of syllables from a target voice and a distracting voice, and asked to recognize a specific target syllable. The task was made more or less difficult by changing (a) the location of the distracting speaker, (b) the scale difference between the two speakers, and/or (c) the relative level of the two speakers. Scale differences were produced by changing the vocal tract length and glottal pulse rate during syllable synthesis: 32 acoustic scale differences were used. Location cues were produced by convolving head-related transfer functions with the stimulus. The angle between the target speaker and the distracter was 0 degrees, 4 degrees, 8 degrees, 16 degrees, or 32 degrees on the 0 degrees horizontal plane. The relative level of the target to the distracter was 0 or -6 dB. The results show that location and scale difference interact, and the interaction is greatest when one of these cues is small. Increasing either the acoustic scale or the angle between target and distracter speakers quickly elevates performance to ceiling levels.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20550271      PMCID: PMC3041806          DOI: 10.1121/1.3377051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  17 in total

1.  Speech intelligibility and localization in a multi-source environment.

Authors:  M L Hawley; R Y Litovsky; H S Colburn
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Informational and energetic masking effects in the perception of two simultaneous talkers.

Authors:  D S Brungart
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Resolution of front-back ambiguity in spatial hearing by listener and source movement.

Authors:  F L Wightman; D J Kistler
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  A glimpsing model of speech perception in noise.

Authors:  Martin Cooke
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Headphone simulation of free-field listening. I: Stimulus synthesis.

Authors:  F L Wightman; D J Kistler
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Localization using nonindividualized head-related transfer functions.

Authors:  E M Wenzel; M Arruda; D J Kistler; F L Wightman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Morphology and development of the human vocal tract: a study using magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  W T Fitch; J Giedd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  The interaction of glottal-pulse rate and vocal-tract length in judgements of speaker size, sex, and age.

Authors:  David R R Smith; Roy D Patterson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Discrimination of speaker size from syllable phrases.

Authors:  D Timothy Ives; David R R Smith; Roy D Patterson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  The processing and perception of size information in speech sounds.

Authors:  David R R Smith; Roy D Patterson; Richard Turner; Hideki Kawahara; Toshio Irino
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  3 in total

1.  Effects of fundamental frequency and vocal-tract length cues on sentence segregation by listeners with hearing loss.

Authors:  Carol L Mackersie; James Dewey; Lesli A Guthrie
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Interaural level differences do not suffice for restoring spatial release from masking in simulated cochlear implant listening.

Authors:  Antje Ihlefeld; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-20       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Behavioral Account of Attended Stream Enhances Neural Tracking.

Authors:  Moïra-Phoebé Huet; Christophe Micheyl; Etienne Parizet; Etienne Gaudrain
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-12-13       Impact factor: 4.677

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.