Literature DB >> 14759032

Sex differences in the acoustic structure of vowel-like grunt vocalizations in baboons and their perceptual discrimination by baboon listeners.

Drew Rendall1, Michael J Owren, Elise Weerts, Robert D Hienz.   

Abstract

This study quantifies sex differences in the acoustic structure of vowel-like grunt vocalizations in baboons (Papio spp.) and tests the basic perceptual discriminability of these differences to baboon listeners. Acoustic analyses were performed on 1028 grunts recorded from 27 adult baboons (11 males and 16 females) in southern Africa, focusing specifically on the fundamental frequency (F0) and formant frequencies. The mean F0 and the mean frequencies of the first three formants were all significantly lower in males than they were in females, more dramatically so for F0. Experiments using standard psychophysical procedures subsequently tested the discriminability of adult male and adult female grunts. After learning to discriminate the grunt of one male from that of one female, five baboon subjects subsequently generalized this discrimination both to new call tokens from the same individuals and to grunts from novel males and females. These results are discussed in the context of both the possible vocal anatomical basis for sex differences in call structure and the potential perceptual mechanisms involved in their processing by listeners, particularly as these relate to analogous issues in human speech production and perception.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14759032     DOI: 10.1121/1.1635838

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  16 in total

1.  Individual recognition during bouts of antiphonal calling in common marmosets.

Authors:  Cory T Miller; A Wren Thomas
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 2.  Do age- and sex-related variations reliably reflect body size in non-human primate vocalizations? A review.

Authors:  E Ey; D Pfefferle; J Fischer
Journal:  Primates       Date:  2007-01-17       Impact factor: 2.163

3.  The communicative content of the common marmoset phee call during antiphonal calling.

Authors:  Cory T Miller; Katherine Mandel; Xiaoqin Wang
Journal:  Am J Primatol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.371

4.  Who is there? Captive western gorillas distinguish human voices based on familiarity and nature of previous interactions.

Authors:  Roberta Salmi; Caroline E Jones; Jodi Carrigan
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2021-08-14       Impact factor: 3.084

5.  Asymmetries in the individual distinctiveness and maternal recognition of infant contact calls and distress screams in baboons.

Authors:  Drew Rendall; Hugh Notman; Michael J Owren
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Female red deer prefer the roars of larger males.

Authors:  Benjamin D Charlton; David Reby; Karen McComb
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2007-08-22       Impact factor: 3.703

7.  The interaction of glottal-pulse rate and vocal-tract length in judgements of speaker size, sex, and age.

Authors:  David R R Smith; Roy D Patterson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Transmission characteristics of primate vocalizations: implications for acoustic analyses.

Authors:  Peter Maciej; Julia Fischer; Kurt Hammerschmidt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-08-01       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Context-related acoustic variation in male fallow deer (Dama dama) groans.

Authors:  Benjamin D Charlton; David Reby
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-06-13       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Do red deer stags (Cervus elaphus) use roar fundamental frequency (F0) to assess rivals?

Authors:  Maxime Garcia; Benjamin D Charlton; Megan T Wyman; W Tecumseh Fitch; David Reby
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-30       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.