Literature DB >> 25698023

Perceptual susceptibility to acoustic manipulations in speaker discrimination.

Gregory Sell1, Clara Suied2, Mounya Elhilali3, Shihab Shamma1.   

Abstract

Listeners' ability to discriminate unfamiliar voices is often susceptible to the effects of manipulations of acoustic characteristics of the utterances. This vulnerability was quantified within a task in which participants determined if two utterances were spoken by the same or different speakers. Results of this task were analyzed in relation to a set of historical and novel parameters in order to hypothesize the role of those parameters in the decision process. Listener performance was first measured in a baseline task with unmodified stimuli, and then compared to responses with resynthesized stimuli under three conditions: (1) normalized mean-pitch; (2) normalized duration; and (3) normalized linear predictive coefficients (LPCs). The results of these experiments suggest that perceptual speaker discrimination is robust to acoustic changes, though mean-pitch and LPC modifications are more detrimental to a listener's ability to successfully identify same or different speaker pairings. However, this susceptibility was also found to be partially dependent on the specific speaker and utterances.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25698023      PMCID: PMC5392054          DOI: 10.1121/1.4906826

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  18 in total

1.  Learning to recognize talkers from natural, sinewave, and reversed speech samples.

Authors:  Sonya M Sheffert; David B Pisoni; Jennifer M Fellowes; Robert E Remez
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Perceptual features of speech for males in four perceived age decades.

Authors:  D E Hartman; J L Danahuer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Speaker sex identification from voiced, whispered, and filtered isolated vowels.

Authors:  N J Lass; K R Hughes; M D Bowyer; L T Waters; V T Bourne
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  On the perception of similarity among talkers.

Authors:  Robert E Remez; Jennifer M Fellowes; Dalia S Nagel
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Voice discrimination and recognition are separate abilities.

Authors:  D Van Lancker; J Kreiman
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  Speaker identification in the absence of inter-subject differences in glottal source characteristics.

Authors:  R O Coleman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1973-06       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Perceptions of personality from speech: effects of manipulations of acoustical parameters.

Authors:  B L Brown; W J Strong; A C Rencher
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1973-07       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  The accuracy of formant frequency measurements: a comparison of spectrographic analysis and linear prediction.

Authors:  R B Monsen; A M Engebretson
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1983-03

9.  Human voice recognition depends on language ability.

Authors:  Tyler K Perrachione; Stephanie N Del Tufo; John D E Gabrieli
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-07-29       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Vocal tract length and formant frequency dispersion correlate with body size in rhesus macaques.

Authors:  W T Fitch
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  1 in total

1.  Distributed acoustic cues for caller identity in macaque vocalization.

Authors:  Makoto Fukushima; Alex M Doyle; Matthew P Mullarkey; Mortimer Mishkin; Bruno B Averbeck
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 2.963

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.